User talk:ChrisSDUK

Your submission at Articles for creation: Be Wiser Insurance (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aerospeed was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Be Wiser Insurance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aerospeed (Talk) 02:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aerospeed (Talk) 02:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Be Wiser Insurance has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Be Wiser Insurance. Thanks! Joseph2302 (talk) 14:21, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Be Wiser Insurance (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Be Wiser Insurance instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Be Wiser Insurance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Joseph2302 (talk) 10:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Be Wiser Insurance

Your recent edits have been far too biased towards advertising; I have addressed this. I also note that you created this article, and your previous recent contributions have been concerning only Be Wiser, and Paul Bird Motorsport which was sponsored by Be Wiser. This is known as a Single purpose account.

Please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not an advertising medium and should not carry external links to Bewiser's youtube channel. Please familarise yourself with WP:COI (WP:PAID), WP:PROMOTION. If you are commercially connected to this business you should declare it and not make any further changes. I have checked LinkedIn. Suggestions for improvements can be suggested at the Talk page, and should be supported with third-party reliable sources. Thank you.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 01:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that you were a direct employee of Paul Bird Motorsport and are now directly employed by Be Wiser. You have continued to directly-change the content of Be Wiser in this change but have failed to respond here with any declaration of employer. Please stop directly contributing to the latter article. Suggestions for future changes can be made at the article's Talk page. You are welcome to contribute to any article where you do not have a conflict of interest.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Be Wiser Insurance

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Be Wiser Insurance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 15:23, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Be Wiser Insurance

The article Be Wiser Insurance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Spam, does not meet WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 17:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]