User talk:ChopSticksChan

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bryan Rich has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bryan Rich was changed by ChopSticksChan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889772 on 2016-01-25T20:34:12+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:34, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ChopSticksChan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ChopSticksChan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:45, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Chris Christie. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Favonian (talk) 20:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andreá Cassar (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment they left was:

All of the references must be about the subject of the article. Do not reference films he is in or other people or projects, only articles about him. See wp:rs about reliable sources. you cannot use IMDB or other social media sites as sources (Tumblr tags -- really?!). Do not imbed http links within the text - only use wikilinks to other wiki articles. Do not try to "inherit" notability by naming famous people who were also in a film -- he cannot inherit their fame, he has to make his own.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andreá Cassar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 00:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added refernces for the Ten Million Club

Hi Chan. I've added several references, most of them long articles in the three main national newspapers of The Netherlands.

Best regards, Dr Jan van Weeren General Secretary of the Ten Million Club--86.90.197.78 (talk) 12:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Armand Cucciniello (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:23, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ChopSticksChan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. I see the User Vanjagenije has permanently blocked my account. I believe this is in error. I am NOT Armand Cucciniello, or any other user mentioned in the block message. I am a genuine individual. However, I do live with and reside in the same residence as other users, and perhaps this is why my account has been flagged?? We share the same IP address, as we live in a group house. I would appreciate you unblocking my account - and providing any guidelines I should follow to ensure no confusion or difficulties arise in the future for you and other editors.

Decline reason:

And of course it's entirely a coincidence that the people sharing your residence also share your interests and edit exactly the same articles and drafts. See WP:MEAT. Huon (talk) 23:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ChopSticksChan (talk) 22:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ChopSticksChan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]