User talk:Chirpy-slirpy-BURPY

Welcome!

Hello, Chirpy-slirpy-BURPY! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 17:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this! :) Chirpy-slirpy-BURPY (talk) 18:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andy Gibb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seven Hills. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Please be aware of overlinking as an issue. See MOS:SEAOFBLUE. An article like University of East Anglia does not need any wikilinks to England and the United Kingdom. Does it really need three wikinks to the Sainsbury Centre; I can see why it is useful to have one in the caption for a picture of it, and one the first time it is mentioned in the text, but what is the justification for the third wikilink. And why does it have three wikilinks to Norwich, and three to Norwich Research Park. It now has four wikilinks to Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital.

At one time we had the article scrubbed of excessive wikilinks. Maybe the best thing to do would be to revert to that version.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:58, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I was not aware of that. I'm not trying to be disruptive, but I was only attempting to expand the page and tidy it up, so to speak. Is it anyway possible to make changes to the page without being reverted? Chirpy-slirpy-BURPY (talk) 08:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In their edit summary, User:Moxy wrote You do best to follow WP:BRD.... don't get blocked before you have a chance to state your case. Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle suggests that if you get reverted, you should explain what you are trying to achieve with your edits on the talk page, and listen to what other editors say. I strongly advise doing that.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you, Todd, I will avoid any potential grammatical errors (due to tiredness) and overlinking. I will do my best to explain myself in each of my edits. Although, I've got other things that I need to do before I resume editing. Have a nice weekend! ;) Chirpy-slirpy-BURPY (talk) 08:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article talk page is the best place to discuss improvements to the article - this is because other users may also want to contribute or just be informed. (i.e. The talk page discussion means that User X will not revert your edit, because he/she now understands why the edit was the right thing to do.)
A user's talk page is the best place to discuss the user's behaviour, for example advising them of mistakes they are making.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your advice, Todd, thank you very much! Chirpy-slirpy-BURPY (talk) 08:37, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page needed tags

Hi Chirpy. Back in July, you made this change to Fascism, removing many "page needed" tags and adding very wide page ranges, presumably whole books. Please don't do this in the future. If you have access to the sources and are able to verify the cited content, please provide the shortest range possible. If not, please leave the tags for someone who can do so. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Surf Lifesaving in Australia

Hello there

I have reverted your last edit because it wasn't an accurate summary of the source and didn't improve the article. The article already states that the surf lifesaving movement grew from the early 20th century, and one can assume that this was because more people were swimming in the surf which is inherently dangerous. There is no need to spell this out in another sentence. This is a high level summary article about Australia. The amount of space which we can devote to the history of individual sports and recreations is limited. If you want to add another sentenece it should be something very important which has been missed. If you disagree, please discuss on the Talk page of the article so others can have their say. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 22:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On second thoughts, I have restored the edit but made it more concise. Also please note that there is no need to link the name of well known cities, countries etc, especially when they are a already linked in an article. MOS:OVERLINK Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Mensch's Barnstar
		Chirpy-slirpy-BURPY, thank you so much for expanding the section I created at Wikimedia Foundation into a full-blown one. More importantly, thanks for being so reasonable and not holding grudges after your edit being reverted by me, and admitting that your revert wasn’t that right (you even gave me a thanks!), and took one step further, helped improving the article in the direction I wished. I believe other editors will continue to refine that section. I hope we have more editors like you and every editor can learn from you. You have earned my respect. Thanks again. --Dustfreeworld (talk) 11:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Genesis (Lebrun)

On 8 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Genesis (Lebrun), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rico Lebrun refused to submit sketches of Genesis (detail pictured), a mural commissioned by Pomona College, for approval by its board of trustees? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Genesis (Lebrun). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Genesis (Lebrun)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]