User talk:Chilicheese22

Battle of Aden (2018)

Hi Please check the news. I think we should create an article. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: Looks like it has already been created. Just needs more information. Chilicheese22 (talk) 17:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tareq Saleh / STC collaboration

I believe that Tareq Saleh loyalists definitely seem to belong as allies of the STC in the infobox now, given the France24 announcement. They might even warrant a fourth column together. That said, I have no idea what to do about the Ahmed Saleh loyalists already listed in the infobox. There's sources on the page as-is, but they're kinda weak, and while there's no sources stating that Ahmed Saleh supports Tareq Saleh right now, Ahmed Saleh is still cited as living in the UAE. Can you please update the YCW infobox with the Tareq/STC alliance? Nuke (talk) 05:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NuclearWizard: Yeah, I too believe that there is now coordination between both factions. The second column (The one that has Hadi) has been used to show anti-Houthi belligerents. Do you think it would be wise to start splitting them up, in order to make a fourth column? If so should they be listed as UAE sub-factions, where the UAE is the listed as the main belligerent? As for Ahmed Saleh loyalists I believe they are composed of the same republican guards that have been set-up and trained in Al-Anad, so I would assume that there is to some extent support between the two. Chilicheese22 (talk) 19:01, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chilicheese22: I'm sorry to be late to respond. UAE subfactions would be too far, especially considering the UAE is still in the Saudi coalition. They should probably stay listed as a supporting faction. There's already a third column for Sunni jihadists such as AQAP and IS; the second column will probably be double or triple the height of the first and third columns, once the STC/Tareq commanders and casualties are added, so there's definitely a navigability/style rationale for splitting them. The main problem here is uncertainty, as always. Nuke (talk) 03:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NuclearWizard: I think the point that you brought up, which is the uncertainty aspect is a very important one. I believe, that for the time being, they should be placed in the second column. Until, they either begin to control large swathes of lands or clashes with the Hadi government begin to be a reoccurring theme. I think, if we place them in a separate column we are getting ahead of ourselves and would also force us in the near-future to start to break up the Saudi Led Co. Don't you agree? Chilicheese22 (talk) 03:24, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chilicheese22: Understandable. The second column works. Like I said, I'm uncertain and thus am leaving this to your discretion. Nuke (talk) 04:03, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NuclearWizard: I think we should wait before adding a new column. Also, I have read sources who said that Tareq will command the forces while Ahmed will lead a political dialogue. --Panam2014 (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NuclearWizard and Panam2014: Alrighty guys, per agreement I decided to keep the belligerents in the same column. Furthermore, I decided not to move Ahmed Saleh and his loyalist since no official statement has been made on his behalf on what he thinks of Tarek's actions. (I will leave that up to you guys if you want to add them to the new alliance) Take a look for yourselves, if you guys have any concerns or feel I missed something, and want my opinion on the matter just post it here. [1] Chilicheese22 (talk) 01:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tareq Saleh called to withdraw UN sanctions against his cousin. --Panam2014 (talk) 17:26, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AQAP v ISIL

@NuclearWizard: Otherwise, for AQAP / ISIL, I think that not only must they be on the same column (as is the case now) but they should not even be separated by a sub-column / under faction because they do not fight each other never, do not make attacks between them, and they have the same goals. It's different from Syria. --Panam2014 (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NuclearWizard and Panam2014: Do you guys feel it would be best that we use the term "Sunni Jihadists" like what is currently being used in the template?? Chilicheese22 (talk) 01:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chilicheese22: Probably not. There's no need for a description for the third column. It's pretty much self-explanatory when the column is filled with Sunni jihadists. Nuke (talk) 01:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Map of the Yemeni Civil War (1994)

Hi I think we should espend the article and making a map. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:04, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: I will do some research on the 1994 civil war that occurred in Yemen, and then begin to try to expand the article, as I have very little knowledge on the matter. Chilicheese22 (talk) 00:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hadramaut offensive

Hi Could you update the module after the Hadrami Elite forces offensive against AQAP ? --Panam2014 (talk) 17:26, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Panam2014: You mean onto the Hadramaut Insurgency page correct? Chilicheese22 (talk) 18:20, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Battle of Al Masini valley and Hadramaut Insurgency. --Panam2014 (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for widening the infobox of Yemeni Civil War without informing you the reason

We had some discussions in the talk page with users expressing intentions to split STC from Hadi-Saudi Coalition (sorry for this bad term) in the box. You may further discuss it with them. I shall not try to do any new edit to the page before you get to any conclusion. Thank you.--霎起林野间 (talk) 14:50, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@霎起林野间: Well from the looks of things, it seems that the thread you posted in has been inactive for well over a month now, what you should've done was start a new one. Also, we had a discussion about such matter in the Yemeni Civil war module [2] and the STC's talk page [3]. If you think that the current format is incorrect, feel free to voice your opinion over there. Chilicheese22 (talk) 17:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions on Kurdistan

Hi Chilicheese22, We’ve noticed that you edited articles related to Kurdistan. Thank you for your great contributions. Keep it up! Bobo.03 (talk) 16:17, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Battle of Hudaida (2018)

On 14 June 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Battle of Hudaida (2018), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:51, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chilicheese22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battle Of Sana'a.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Battle Of Sana'a.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Veggies (talk) 20:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Research Interview Request

Dear Chilicheese22

I am part of a research project at the University of Westminster, London that looks at contentious Wikipedia articles and would like to interview you about your work and the issues and intricacies within collaboration practices. We have observed that you are a prominent contributor to the Wikipedia community, particularly in some articles of our interest related to ongoing armed conflicts.

If you would be interested in participating in this research or would like more information, please do not hesitate to contact me through the Wikipedia mailbox or my personal talkpage.

Best regards,

Etchubykalo doctoral researcher at the communication and media research institute (CAMRI), University of Westminster, London. —Preceding undated comment added 15:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)