User talk:Chieharumachi
Welcome!
[edit]
|
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited La Union, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Abra and Kalinga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Religious sector resistance against the Marcos dictatorship into Murder of Francisco Laurella, Fernando Pastor Sr., and Fernando Pastor Jr.. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:15, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks User:Diannaa! I usually add the templates, but I thought I rewrote it enough that it wasn't the same as the old text anymore, and I got lazy to add the templates. I've added the templates now.
Nomination of List of Philippine public figures who underwent COVID-19 testing for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Philippine public figures who underwent COVID-19 testing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Philippine_public_figures_who_underwent_COVID-19_testing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
I don't want to waste your time and effort in editing the article's background so please participate in the discussion.
While you're at it, I already created a draft on the background of the article in case it gets nuked.
See you there!—Allenjambalaya (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- I have personal reasons for not wanting to participate in an AfD, unfortunately. As for drafting a new article, that's fine by me, except that I feel the current draft is severely lacking in detail and nuance. (And has a few grammatical issues.) Why not just expand the current list and move it to an article? That would be much less work. - Chieharumachi (talk) 13:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Mostly, I'm concerned that the precise sequence of events was not given importance here, and also removed from the current version of the text. Dates are important because they demonstrate: (a) the insensitivity of the act at a particular point in history (when there were few tests); which actions on which dates led to violations of the algorithm. To my mind, these are essentially "criminal" acts (in the popular, if not necessarily also legal, sense), so timelines are absolutely important. - Chieharumachi (talk) 13:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
New message from Allenjambalaya
[edit]
Message added 14:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Allenjambalaya (talk) 14:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
"Rogelio Guevarra" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rogelio Guevarra. Since you had some involvement with the Rogelio Guevarra redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 21:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Deletion of something I added.
[edit]Hi Chieharumachi,
You deleted info that added on Imelda Marcos, while I agree with your perception based on what you saw. Someone deleted the main element of why in my opinion it should be there.
The following was deleted, since I last posted it, and is crucial to its relevance there.
Meg Adonis of Philippine Daily Inquirer noted and recommended the documentary as a way to look at Marcos' relationship with the entertainment industry. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Imelda_Marcos&diff=955833976&oldid=955762921
There is more regarding the implication of Marcos in the making of the film, but removed it to focus on the content with her in the film. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Imelda_Marcos&diff=prev&oldid=955488538
Have a look and let me know, obviously sad to see what I consider good information to be gone.
However Marcos relationship with Cinema isn't seen at all in this article, so whether the The Search for Weng Weng is kept or not. What the film talks about in that regard to her relationship with Cinema should be observed.Filmman3000 (talk) 17:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- HiFilmman3000. That was not me. I don't usually delete things immediately unless they're blatantly contrary to fact, or extremely irrelevant. I tag them for further discussion. You may want to check the article history to see who might have done the actual deleting. Also,you may want to discuss this on the article's actual talk page, so that others can comment. (There seems to be a section for discussing that matter.) I hope that in that way, you can get some clarity on the matter. All the best, Chieharumachi (talk) 04:25, 21 May 2020 (UTC).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 00:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 19:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ferdinand Marcos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jorge Vargas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Marcos jewels at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 12:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Marcos jewels
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Marcos jewels at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 11:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 00:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 2
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imelda Marcos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eduardo Quintero.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Marcos jewels
[edit]
On 2 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marcos jewels, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that ousted Philippine president Ferdinand Marcos and his wife Imelda left 400 pieces of unlawfully acquired jewelry in their palace and were caught smuggling out another $5–10 million worth of gems? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marcos jewels. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Marcos jewels), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Canvass
[edit]
It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 18:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- I (admittedly gradually, since I realized some of these late) left notices in the places I thought ethically necessary to do so:
- on your talk page first,
- on the BLPN discussion regarding the ANI discussion;
- on the ANI discussion regarding the BLPN discussion; and
- on the talk page of the article in question, Imelda Marcos.
- I don't think I missed anything else; possibly the wikiprojects covering said article? But I'm giving serious thought as to whether that is necessary. This side-task of pushing for WP:CIVIL in discourse is a tiresome task, you know, as there are many other articles that need attention. Anyway, The four I mentioned above, however, were places where I felt notices were both conversationally appropriate and necessary for stakeholder participation. - Chieharumachi (talk) 19:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Some bubble tea for you!
[edit]
|
Hello there! Thank you for creating an article on Zorro Aguilar in Wikipedia. I highly appreciate your work. Keep on keeping on! Here's a bubble tea for you. Xander Wu (talk) 03:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC) |
- And to you, Xander Wu, for your wonderful cleanup work at the Jacobo Amatong draft! Hehe. Let's celebrate when it enters the mainspace. :D - Chieharumachi (talk) 12:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit]
Your edit to Calauit Safari Park has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This was from 2019, but I am warning you since this was a direct copy and paste from the source. Sennecaster (What now?) 19:42, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi User:Sennecaster. If it was the passage that was recentely deleted, I don't remember the edit, especially since it cites a fact I don't even think is interesting. And am aghast at the idea that it could have been me. I suppose it's possible I accidentally published an edit before I could rephrase it. I see that the relevant passage has been removed, or I would have removed it myself and apologized. Is there anything further I can do to rectify this? :S - Chieharumachi (talk) 06:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not that I know of, but a silly mistake like that is generally fine. Just don't make a habit of it :) Sennecaster (What now?) 10:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Noted with much gratitude User:Sennecaster. My memory of that article is one of very rapid edits, filling in one fact after the other as the The Kingmaker (film) film became more and more popular. :S The only thing I can think of is that I must have clicked publish without realising I had not yet actually done the requisite paraphrasing :S Yes, I shall certainly try to be more careful in the future. Thank you very much for the notice. - Chieharumachi (talk) 13:57, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Wait. User:Sennecaster, I have attempted to go through the edits, particularly edit 802214288, and I am beginning to wonder if it was User:Xanders995 who performed those edits, not me. That would explain why I don't remember the edits. I DO, however, often move article sections around or reproduce parts of the article in the article or secton ledes, to form a summary, with the assumption that other editors have done their due diligence. Which may have been why some of the content has been attributed to me. Is this possible? If so it would certainly stop me from beating myself up over an error of judgement I do not remember making. :S If it somehow was me, of course, I must continue to profusely apologize. - Chieharumachi (talk) 14:11, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Noted with much gratitude User:Sennecaster. My memory of that article is one of very rapid edits, filling in one fact after the other as the The Kingmaker (film) film became more and more popular. :S The only thing I can think of is that I must have clicked publish without realising I had not yet actually done the requisite paraphrasing :S Yes, I shall certainly try to be more careful in the future. Thank you very much for the notice. - Chieharumachi (talk) 13:57, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not that I know of, but a silly mistake like that is generally fine. Just don't make a habit of it :) Sennecaster (What now?) 10:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Focus on Marcos?
[edit]Hi Chieharamuchi I’m curious that you seem to post a lot of edits on Marcos. Are you a Marcos historian or do you work with the Marcoses? LeoCastillo (talk) 09:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have been busy so I just saw this. I'm not sure I qualify as a Martial Law era historian, since I have no degree in history, unless you count a class or two on art history. But I and my family (both biological and in-laws) do read a lot about the Martial Law era, and my family a small library of personally-collected books about that time in our history. That's about it. I do this as a hobby, based on books which I have access to. - Chieharumachi (talk) 08:55, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Chieharumachi. Thank you for creating Negros famine. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the article!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Category:Filipino-Americans honored at the Bantayog ng mga Bayani has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Filipino-Americans honored at the Bantayog ng mga Bayani has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 23:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Chieharumachi. Thank you for your work on Protest music against the Marcos dictatorship. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:53, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Chieharumachi. Thank you for your work on Jesus Antonio Carpio. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 20:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)