User talk:Chickensarebleepssorryuncle
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Chickensarebleepssorryuncle! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 21:24, Saturday, August 3, 2019 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome Chickensarebleepssorryuncle!
I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
Railway station names
[edit]Hello. I see that you are moving a lot of railway station articles. It is usual to discuss such wide-ranging moves in advance. Wikipedia article titles are normally in sentence case (Foo railway station rather than Foo Railway Station). Whilst there is no specific policy for Indian stations, similar national guidelines for Canada, Ireland, UK and the United States use sentence case. I suggest that you seek consensus in an RfC or similar forum before moving more pages. Certes (talk) 20:54, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know! Chickensarebleepssorryuncle (talk) 21:00, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Given the large amount of Indian station articles, what is the best method to seek consensus in such forums? I only joined Wikipedia a week ago so I a not experienced in doing this. Chickensarebleepssorryuncle (talk) 01:07, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Stop
[edit]Stop adding "Expand|Interwiki" tags to articles. If you continue to do so, you will be reported to administrators and blocked from editing. Softlavender (talk) 11:57, 21 August 2019 (UTC) Hi, do you mean the "Expand Language" tags? I am trying to expand information regarding Dance in India where many of the pages have a larger selection of information in foreign languages, oftentimes the languages of where the dances originated. Chickensarebleepssorryuncle (talk) 16:59, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Category:Sikh Bollywood Actresses has been nominated for discussion
[edit]
Category:Sikh Bollywood Actresses, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 11:58, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Stop adding tags
[edit]Stop adding stub and other tags to articles. If you continue to do so, you will be reported to administrators.
Thus far in nearly 300 edits you have apparently only made a single small cited content addition to Wikipedia. Virtually all you have done is add erroneous stub tags, add needless interwiki-expand tags, add groundless one-source tags, add navboxes, and change or add images. It is not really clear that you are here to build an encyclopedia.
The majority of your edits have been disruptive. Please change your editing patterns and stop adding tags and templates. And please clearly describe each and every edit you make, using edit summaries. -- Softlavender (talk) 12:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Hey there, what you are saying sounds a little bit complicated, as I have only been on for a few weeks. Will you please explain in layman's terms? I am trying to expand the Dance in India directory but this hasn't been productive apparently? Many of the articles apply to such as they are mostly a few sentences or paragraphs.Chickensarebleepssorryuncle (talk) 16:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Infobox
[edit]Stop adding photos to infobox about countries. If you continue to do so, you will be reported to administrators. Check Infobox country. Peter1170 (talk) 18:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi,
With all due respect, the photos I added to the infoboxes were only to city-states such as Singapore, Monaco, and Vatican City. As these are both cities and countries, generally major cities will have photos in their respective infoboxes. Nowhere in Template:Infobox_country does it explicitly forbid adding photos to countries' infoboxes but this would be a different scenario as city states are effectively both cities and countries. After an inquiry on Singapore's talk page about adding photos to Singapore's infobox most people responded in favor, and the only one that didn't did so neutrally, saying that it may seem unprecedented unless I make it a special case as a city state, which is what I did for all three. I only added photos to city states as they are cities also, and I did not add photos to countries that are not city states, as they contain cities, and are not cities themselves. What is wrong with this?
Thank You! Chickensarebleepssorryuncle (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Draft:Saloma Miller Furlong concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Saloma Miller Furlong, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Saloma Miller Furlong
[edit]
Hello, Chickensarebleepssorryuncle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saloma Miller Furlong".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)