User talk:Chiayi77

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

The author of this article is Jason Mark, not Mark Mark. re: please correct: re - Mark, Mark (9 December 2014). "Climate Fiction Fantasy - What 'Interstellar' and 'Snowpiercer' Got Wrong". New York Times. Retrieved 11 December 2014.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:36, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Lynn idea to change title of page to Climate Fiction. signed by Dan Bloom Chiayi77 (talk) 03:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Chiayi77/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 13:35, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Chiayi77, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 13:35, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LynnS79, just for my files and reference I am trying to locate the post you made the other day which called for deleting the cli fi page entirely if we all could not agree to rename the page as climate ficiton with an ultimatum of one week. That post is my my other files but I am sure i saw it here and want to know what day you made that post and where the post is now. water under the bridge, but just want to refernce in case mods give me an opportunity rename the page back to cli-fi since ultimatums and threats should not happen at Wiki and among Wpedians. Can you cite the day and date you made that remark? Thanks. (Chiayi77 (talk) 10:59, 23 March 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

Lynn, thanks for note. I am really sorry i feel so stupid and dumb and foolish, i made a huge mahor ID mistake but it waswnt until yuou came really claean today in yur post to admin that i woke up from mu STUPOR. see myu mea culpa omlinme. I HAVE that post i saved everuthing. give me a minute. it's midnight here in Taiwan. m,aybe some day we can be friends buit later when you are ready if you want. I am really sorry. I am nice Jewish guy from boston. http://danbloom888.blogspot.com kis my blog in taiwan no cli fi. see me real me. smile ......But you stole my page. NOT nice thing to do. without explanaing why. had we emaield nmaybe we could have commicanged better but i see your fear of emaolign to strsngetrs. peace (Chiayi77 (talk) 13:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

and lynn re see my caps LynnS79, just for my files and reference I am trying to locate the post you made the other day which called for deleting the cli fi page entirely if we all could not agree to rename the page as climate ficiton with an ultimatum of one week. That post is my my other files but I am sure i saw it here and want to know what day you made that post and where the post is now. .......SURE WLLL LOOK........ later under the bridge, but just want to refernce in case mods give me an opportunity rename the page back to cli-fi since ultimatums and threats should not happen at Wiki and among Wpedians. Can you cite the day and date you made that remark? Thanks. [DAN says] if you rename the page nack to cli fi you are my best friewnd of life. THANKS! PS i knmow u dont trust emaol to straingers but i fyou evger trust me inf ututre my addy is danbloom AT gmail DOT Com. (Chiayi77 (talk) 13:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Chiayi77/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting changes

Dear NewsandEventsGuy in 2017, after three years, regarding A special case is outing, that is, revealing information about another editor that they have not revealed themselves and probably do not want known, such as their name (if not revealed by the editor in question).." If an editor has information later on that reveals that one person was using two different Wiki Pseudonyms as Wiki IDs and using one ID on Talk Wiki to insist that he/him/her/they were NOT the same person and saying one thing via one ID and a completely different thing on the other day and therefore in so doing actually lying about their motives for conducting an editing campaign that lasted six months, and the two IDs in fact belong to the same person, should that be reported or just ignored? I do not intend to out anyone. My hope is that this person who I will not name will out themselves. But how to pursue this? I have no quarrels with the editing now. But I have recently discovered who that the two IDs, both pseudonyms but easily traced once one puts two and two together belong to the same editor, and she always insisted on WikiTalk that she did not know the other editor and had no connection with that other person, when in fact, as I have now learned, there were the same person. How does one fix this so that people do not use two different pseudonym IDS to pretend that they are not related to the same person pushing an exact similar agenda? RSVP. thanks, Chiayi 77 in 2017. (Chiayi77

DAN (Chiayi77 (talk) 04:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

Hi Chiayi77, when you want to request changes to an article, please do so on the talk page rather than in the article itself. Thanks! -- haminoon (talk) 03:25, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will do in future. In fact, Haminoon, I did post requset for changes at a talk page but nobody lifted a finger. So I posted there. Sorry. THanks for fixing it(Chiayi77 (talk) 03:52, 28 March 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

You did it again just after you posted this. Its verging on vandalism that can get you blocked from Wikipedia. Just be patient with talk page suggestions - someone will get to them eventually. -- haminoon (talk) 04:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will be more careful, Haminoon. I have had MY origionalo wiki page wikijacked by an anti cli fi professor and i know her name now and which groups she works with to try to take down the cli fi work i am doing, and she is allowed to post her crap here? Its unethical. SHe is affailted with a major anit cli fi website and she preotensd she has no agenda and is neatuerla. my eye, she is NOT neurtal at all. She unethically foreced my title to be chagned to anotehr title desterpuiong 3 year sof work 24/ 7 ehre. how would you feel? no one has come to my denfese NOT ONE Wpedian? SHEESH. that said, yes, i will follow the rules i just wanted you and other to see the exampke of cli fi disabvmuition idea. can we do?(Chiayi77 (talk) 04:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

Haminoon, i have spokent with David Goodman and Mathew Dann and they did nothing. The woman wiwkijacked my page, has not been upfront about her agenda and coonection with the Eco Fciton weviste which used to be called CLI FI BOOKS see? the women who runs is my friend but we had a difference of POV and now she hates the cli fi term and even censores if trom her website. if a poerson in an interiew says he is writing a cli fi book as QUOTE she changes his quote to I am writing a climate fiction book. That is facsst censtorhsop. and LYNN goes along with this and is good fire9odsnw tih mary they bohj live in BC in Canadda and are deep greens. I am deep green too. they should bne on mhy side. i am on their side. but for reaons i cannot udnerswand, they are attacking CLI FI my lif's work. and nobodyu is rsiing here to defend me. How you like if someone hihacked yr page through deceit and unethical psots and got the titeld changed?

But thanks for telling me abotu vandalism. I didn;t know. i will stop that. DAN (Chiayi77 (talk) 04:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

Hello David, quick wiki question, remember the cli-fi climate fiction brouhaha in 2015 when someone name ..... LynnS79 ....tried to get the title of the page changed from cli fi to climate fiction and succeeded. and all is well now, water under the bridge, life goes on, and the page is better for it now. I love what eventually happened. But my Q is where is LynnS78 now, her useris seems to have been deleted from WIKI TALK and funny, she never edited anything at WIKI before the cli fi brouhaha, and then after it was over she LEFT and never posted again after she went on vacation for a week in April 2015. Disappeared. and she has never written anything anywhere about cli fi. Can you tell me this? can a person delete their footprint from Wiki Talk just like that? I have a feeling who she really is, in fact, I know who she is, but I don't want to get into this again. SMILE. I just want to know how can someone join WIKI TALK and then make trouble and then disappear without a trace, is that kosher? Cheers, DAN BLOOM in Taiwan and still hard at work with cli-fi meme. DO RSVP my Wiki Talk ID is Chiayi77 DAN (Chiayi77DAN (Chiayi77 (talk) 04:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

Edit war warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Climate fiction. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection.

You are w-a-a-a-a-y past 3RR. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 07:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DAN (Chiayi77 (talk) 04:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)).[reply]

Dear NewsandEventsGuy, after three years, regarding A special case is outing, that is, revealing information about another editor that they have not revealed themselves and probably do not want known, such as their name (if not revealed by the editor in question).." If an editor has information later on that reveals that one person was using two different Wiki Pseudonyms as Wiki IDs and using one ID on Talk Wiki to insist that he/him/her/they were NOT the same person and saying one thing via one ID and a completely different thing on the other day and therefore in so doing actually lying about their motives for conducting an editing campaign that lasted six months, and the two IDs in fact belong to the same person, should that be reported or just ignored? I do not intend to out anyone. My hope is that this person who I will not name will out themselves. But how to pursue this? I have no quarrels with the editing now. But I have recently discovered who that the two IDs, both pseudonyms but easily traced once one puts two and two together belong to the same editor, and she always insisted on WikiTalk that she did not know the other editor and had no connection with that other person, when in fact, as I have now learned, there were the same person. How does one fix this so that people do not use two different pseudonym IDS to pretend that they are not related to the same person pushing an exact similar agenda? RSVP. thanks, Chiayi 77 in 2017. (Chiayi77

DS Alert (climate change)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Climate change, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 08:07, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:DISRUPT

Please read WP:DISRUPT and try to find a little self control. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 08:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Thank you. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Chiayi77. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 14:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Mdann52 (talk) 14:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cli-Fi (disambiguation) (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cli-Fi (disambiguation) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 15:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cli-Fi (disambiguation)

Hello, Chiayi77. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Cli-Fi".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 09:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]