User talk:Cheviotla

Your edits of the section about Grade separation on the Metro line are way off. The part I wrote had to do about grade separation issues at Dorsey - not about this Goodman person. I am moving these inappropriate comments to discussion. Try to get with the program and create an even handed page that represents all sides.76.90.39.108 (talk) 22:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Bruabf (talk) 22:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Goodmon

copied from my talk page - what is the etiquette on where the talk goes?

My stuff is not balanced? You should read what you write. "his misleading campaign has gained popularity" What part is misleading? How do you know it gained popularity - did you conduct a poll? Where is your evidence of fliers, or that they had any effect? Actually this whole section serves no purpose. People have real concerns that are not due to Goodmon - it is not a big conspiracy of irrational people. Is it irrational to be concerned about a new risk to the students (probably less of a danger than drive by shootings)? No it would be irrational not to be concerned. Especially when the only argument against safety is that it costs too much. Also I deleted the stuff about the USC professor. A wiki page is not your forum for bashing people you disagree with. Here is a rule of thumb, if their name hasnt come up yet on this page, then they are not important enough for you to discredit here. Bruabf (talk) 01:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

COI vs Outing

Please be warned that revealing the real name of an editor who chooses to be anonymous is grounds for immediate and permanent banning from this site. I understand you're concerned about conflict of interest, but that doesn't justify making accusations on article talk pages. Please focus on the edits, not the editors. Issues with inappropriate editing should be raised in forums, like WP:COIN, established for the purpose. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 20:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)