User talk:Chettiramandanna

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chettiramandanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Since I was unable to publish the page which I have created, I had requested my friend(gautham pai) to create it for me. There is no suspicious activity here. The article which I created was still showing in Draft, it wasn't publishing

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Nick-D (talk) 07:41, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chettiramandanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have learned the Wikipedia guidelines thoroughly and shall not do anything disruptive in future

I completely understand what I have been blocked for,
I will not continue to cause damage or disruption in future, and
I will make useful contributions instead.

I apologize for the inconvenience caused. I kindly request you to unblock my account to contribute useful articles for wikipedia! Chettiramandanna (talk) 06:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll need to go into more detail about those points in order to be unblocked, including explaining what it is that you did wrong, in order to demonstrate understanding. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chettiramandanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have learned the Wikipedia guidelines thoroughly and shall not do anything disruptive in future #I understand that I have been blocked for mockpuppeting gautham.pai's article. Please be aware that it wasn't intentional. As I was a new user to Wikipedia, I was having trouble to publish an article, it wasn't publishing from my account for some unknown reason, the article which I created was lying in a Draft for a week. So I requested my friend(gautham.pai) to publish it on my behalf as he was good contributor for Wikipedia and he has been using it from many years. That's how we both had a same article. #I will not continue to do this in future, I will make sure that I will publish it from my account itself. #I will make sure my articles make a very good contribution here. Please consider this request and help to unblock my account. Chettiramandanna (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not indicate a sufficient understanding of the reasons for the block. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chettiramandanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked since I was found to be the sockpuppet of Gautam.pai. I understand that copy pasting is not allowed on Wikipedia. I also understand that I have violated the Wikipedia's policies by removing maintenance tags. I have learned the Wikipedia guidelines thoroughly and shall not do anything disruptive in future. Please consider my apology and help to unblock my account. Thank you Chettiramandanna (talk) 09:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please read the section of the WP:GAB pertaining to sock puppetry. In any event, I could not unblock you to write about Bharath Bopanna. You would need to tell us the constructive edits you would make. I see Gautham.pai.t has been unblocked already. Do you have an off-Wiki relationship with this person? If you are Gautham.pai.t, there is no reason to unblock this account. IMHO, if you are not Gautham.pai.t, the best you could hope for would be the standard offer, though I do not feel inclined to consider that a viable option. In short, you'd need to not edit the English Wikipedia under this or any other user name, or not logged in, for 6 months, and then seek unblock. If there are other Wikimedia projects you can work on, then doing so constructively in the interim would reflect favorably on your request. Thanks, Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:23, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chettiramandanna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to convince as much as possible and I have already read WP:GAB pertaining to sock puppetry. Not sure how else I could explain. No value for being honest here. Very bad! I have explained many times, Gautham.pai.t is not my account, he is my friend. Very bad experience with Wikipedia, I do not see anyone giving proper instructions here or they are giving any chance to correct myself. You guys are treating as if I made a cyber crime/some fraud activities. Very disappointing guys! Chettiramandanna (talk) 06:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:MEAT. Very disappointing, Chettiramandanna. Yamla (talk) 09:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your Block Reason

Hello Chettiramandanna, you're blocked since you are found to be the sockpuppet of Gautam.pai. See the investigation here. If you're saying that both the accounts do not belong to you and the publisher is your friend, its called meatpuppetry, see WP:MEAT. Copy pasting is not allowed on Wikipedia, see the deletion log of the article you are involved in here. You also violated the Wikipedia's policies by removing maintenance tags. Hope that clarifies. — The Ultimate ^{Let's Talk} 07:42, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My clarification

You also violated the Wikipedia's policies by removing maintenance tags My answer to this question, If you see my account, its a new account that I created, and removing the maintenance tags was not intentional. Since I was new to this, I wasn't sure if was a maintenance tag that was added to my source code. I hope you understand it. Adding to the above point. I was creating an article from my account. But unfortunately I was not able to publish it from my account and there was no proper instructions too which is disappointing for a new user like me. So I had to reach out to my friend gautham.pai to create a same article and I shared him the source code. But I missed to delete the draft article. And now you guys have blocked for this. Very disappointing. Mistakes happen by humans, nobody is perfect in this world. But what you learn from it matters. I just wanted to clarify that no one is doing some fraud activity here. I hope you understand my situation and help to unblock my account.

@Chettiramandanna:: I once again clarify that you aren't blocked for removing the maintenance templates. I had just reverted your edits. Next time instead of copy pasting, please move your page. Anybody can move pages, even you. PS: Please sign your replies everytime you write on talk pages by placing four tildes like this ~~~~ — The Ultimate ^{Let's Talk} 10:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Ultimate:: "You also violated the Wikipedia's policies by removing maintenance tags. Hope that clarifies." --- This line clarifies that its also one of the reasons for getting blocked. Also, like I mentioned before, copy pasting the contents was not intentional. Since I was unable to create article from my account, I request my friend(gautham.pai) to create it for me, but I missed to delete Draft document. Lets not waste our time arguing here. Kindly let me know how to get my account unblocked. Chettiramandanna (talk) 07:35, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The Ultimate:: May I know how can I get my account unblocked please? Chettiramandanna (talk) 06:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chettiramandanna:: Please put the "unblock" request by placing {{unblock|Your reason here - proving the block action is not required anymore. Also convince the adminstrator that you have learned the Wikipedia guidelines thoroughly and shall not do anything disruptive in future. . Read WP:NICETRY before placing unblock tag. Hope you're unblocked this time. But it depends upon the administrator if he's convinced with you or not. — The Ultimate ^{Let's Talk} 07:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]