User talk:Chelyx

This is Chelyx's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Chelyx, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Chelyx! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Vince Murdock for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vince Murdock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vince Murdock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jairzinho Rozenstruik

Really nice job on the new page for Jairzinho Rozenstruik. Looks great! Udar55 (talk) 00:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 248 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, UFC 248, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:33, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabina Mazo has been accepted

Sabina Mazo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sportspeople from Oroville, California has been nominated for discussion

Category:Sportspeople from Oroville, California, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Oroville, California by occupation has been nominated for discussion

Category:People from Oroville, California by occupation, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 13:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello Chelyx. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Chelyx. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Chelyx|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 05:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: I have no affiliation whatsoever with this person, I was just updating the the article, among others. --Chelyx (talk) 06:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? I have shared some off-wiki evidence with Yunshui so, please wait for him to review. GSS ^💬 06:31, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:10, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vince Murdock has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vince Murdock. Thanks! Cassiopeia^(talk) 12:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vince Murdock

Hello, Chelyx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vince Murdock, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vince Murdock

Hello, Chelyx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vince Murdock".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]