Jump to content

User talk:Check two you

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello Check two you, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair | Talk 01:35, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to the vargas gang are perplexing. The article does not need wikifying. It uses wikisyntax throughout to make a range of relevant links. So I have removed the wikify tag. It does want references, but as you are the principal author (so it seems) you are in the best position to add references. Please improve the article, especially giving sources for your edits. But please don't add the "wikify" tag back, because it is not the right tag. Thanks Zeimusu | Talk page 15:38, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

O.G. Mack

[edit]

As per the last comment on your talk page, I'm not sure why you have added the wkfy tag back to this article. It is formatted correctly dispite its small size. Perhaps another edit template would better convey the changes you wish to see? .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 03:12, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I hope you're well. Thanks for 'pruning' the recent extra chat on the 'global city' talk page: I'm not sure deleting it was proper, but I'm not arguing. :) While recent edits made by the 'anon' were definitely problematic, I responded in the hope of ameliorating that user's ... "dizziness" and in the quest for all-round enlightenment. I've also been involved in a long-standing dispute regarding the article (from, IMHO, a similarly "dizzy" user), so I appreciate other efforts at balance. Difficult, I know. :) Thanks again! E Pluribus Anthony 13:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Viva la revoluccion de chavacano!

[edit]

Bien venido a wikipedia!No conosco bien Chavacano. Apprendi mi espaniol solo aqui en japon. Me gustaria tambien apprender chavacanno. Debe que propagar lo!--Jondel 12:44, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Native Guns

[edit]

Do not remove AFD notices from articles, such as you did with Native Guns, while being discussed on Articles for Deletion. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 00:33, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't think Asian Crips was a speedy candidate since it asserts they are widespread. Please visit the AFD and make the case for deletion. Kappa 01:28, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ramirez/Vargas Gang 2

[edit]

Is there any written account of this Vargas/Ramirez gang existing? Im pretty familiar with the Pilipino-American gang culture and haven't heard of either of them.-user Wikipedian13

barnstar for your userpage

[edit]
Check two you is hereby awarded this barnstar for his exemplary work in fighting vandals on Reggaeton. --Urthogie 21:18, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chavacano

[edit]

Kumusta, taga-Zamboanga kayo? No hablo chavacano pero sí que hablo español. In any case, the 2000 census records are fine. I used them for my blog post back in July 2004 at http://salitablog.blogspot.com/2004/07/news-about-chabacano-chavacano.html. --Chris S. 19:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Beck (manga). You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mboverload@ 01:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Melody-album-cover.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Melody-album-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Last Don.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Last Don.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Front Fareast logo.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Front Fareast logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imaginative Illusions Sdn. Bhd.

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Imaginative Illusions Sdn. Bhd., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Imaginative Illusions Sdn. Bhd.. —BradV 03:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pastel manga.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 08:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Check two you! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Selena Lin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Kazumi Kazui - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Earthian manga.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Earthian manga.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 00:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Earthian manga.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Earthian manga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 08:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 21:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Imaginative Illusions Sdn. Bhd. for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imaginative Illusions Sdn. Bhd. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imaginative Illusions Sdn. Bhd. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 19:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shanghai GM logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shanghai GM logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article 0verflow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear particularly notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nouniquenames 17:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flip (slang) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flip (slang) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flip (slang) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:37, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article The Age (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable subject. Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:55, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article The World of Legend has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable subject. Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:55, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Magical Land has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable subject. Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:56, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Check two you. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Banging on Wax.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Banging on Wax.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:57, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Philippines war flag.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused low res duplicate of C:File:War Flag of the Philippines.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 16:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Tagalog.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by File:Tagalosphere.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 15:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Celestial Digital Entertainment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This company article has been unreferenced for the preceding 12 years. A basic BEFORE fails to find any references other than a single press release which may or may not be in reference to the same entity. The company's website produces a dead link. The article would almost certainly be deleted at AfD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chetsford (talk) 15:16, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Princess Rouge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article on a two-episode direct-to-video animated series has been without references for the last 13 years. A references tag has been present on the article for the last two months without remedy. A basic BEFORE fails to find any WP:RS to the title other than inclusion in a directory listing. Article would most certainly be deleted at AfD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chetsford (talk) 15:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Front Fareast Industrial requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GamerPro64 02:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Front Fareast Industrial for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Front Fareast Industrial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Front Fareast Industrial until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:57, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Front Fareast logo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Front Fareast logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Death Threat (hip hop group) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death Threat (hip hop group) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Threat (hip hop group) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Badbluebus (talk) 02:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]