Jump to content

User talk:Chauvelin2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Chauvelin2000! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:57, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

August 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:58, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Franklin Library (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links to Milton, Ulysses, David Copperfield, The Beast Must Die, Vanity Fair and Compulsion

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

[edit]

Your recent editing history at Franklin Library shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Please don't edit-war: it leads to a block. Drmies (talk) 03:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Besides edit-warring and reinstating unencyclopedic content without so much as an edit summary, you have also removed valid maintenance templates (in itself a disruptive act). User:LadyofShalott has started a section on the talk page where you are free to engage in discussion; you may not simply reinstate this unencyclopedic, non-neutral, and improperly verified content. I suggest you have a look at WP:NPOV (neutrality), WP:V (verifiability--and your own website is not a reliable source), and WP:NOTDIR (on why Wikipedia articles are not lists of trivia). I am reverting you: please understand that you have reverted three times already (without explaining why), and that is a clear-line offense, as WP:3R explains. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:57, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Chauvelin2000. You have new messages at Talk:Franklin Library.
Message added 18:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shearonink (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Endowment House work.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Endowment House work.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 02:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Abigail Thorne.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Abigail Thorne.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 02:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Stillman Pond.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Stillman Pond.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 02:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:St George Temple construct.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:St George Temple construct.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 03:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Heber Kimball home1.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Heber Kimball home1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christian revival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Religion in America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Nauvoo Temple (flipped Daguerreotype).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 20:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Mormon Trail.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Mormon Trail.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:00, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unpublished master's thesis

[edit]

Hello. I see you've been adding the reference Bowen, Craig H. (1995) Academic Freedom and the Utah Controversies of 1911 and 1915. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Utah to several articles. WP:SCHOLARSHIP urges care when citing unpublished manuscripts and theses, as they may be unreliable, offer views disproportionate to their prominence, and/or be primary sources. "Masters dissertations and theses are considered reliable only if they can be shown to have had significant scholarly influence." I would advise you to use validly published resources when possible. If there are journal articles or book chapters that cover the same information, then those should be cited instead. Additionally, over-reliance on unpublished manuscripts located in a single library can make it harder to verify the content. And as an aside, the preferred way to format italics is double apostrophes (not quotation marks), as described in MOS:ITALIC. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 19:40, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And as a follow up: Per MOS:FURTHER, "Further reading" sections should generally not duplicate the content of the References section (see also Wikipedia:Further reading). Also, when citing the same source multiple times, see Wikipedia:Citing sources#Repeated citations, and for ease in formatting, you might use various citation templates (e.g. {{cite journal}}, {{cite book}}, {{cite thesis}}). --Animalparty! (talk) 19:57, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stillman Pond has been accepted

[edit]
Stillman Pond, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:54, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anson Call, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sweetwater River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Chauvelin2000. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Elfabet. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Elijah Abel seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The amount of peacock language and flattering you've added over the past two hundred edits is too much, per WP:MOS and WP:POV. Maybe take a break for a minute and reign in the outpouring? Elfabet (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nibley and Barker

[edit]

Nibley's clearly not a reliable source for much more than LDS views (as opposed to fact). Barker doesn't seem much better, hence WP:RSN#Is Margaret Barker a reliable source for the Book of Enoch or Seven Archangels?. Doug Weller talk 10:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Book of Giants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cosmic Covenant (May 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I see no evidence that this is the commonly used term for the concept. It appears your discussion is limited to the Judeo-Christian tradition, so perhaps it might be something like Covenants in the Bible, but that might be covered by some of our other articles.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 19:32, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Chauvelin2000! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 19:32, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seven Archangels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canonical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A few things

[edit]

First off, thank you for the work you've been doing to improve biographical articles like Elijah Abel, Zebedee Coltrin, and Stillman Pond. We need editors who have a good knowledge of historical sources and who are willing to write articles. That said, I have a few requests for you:

  1. Please use edit summaries. Right now 99.4% of your edits have a blank edit summary. [1] That's bad. This is a collaborative project, and part of that collaboration includes letting other editors know what you're doing without forcing them to investigate every single edit.
  2. Please use talk pages. Again, collaboration. Let people know what you're doing by using article talk pages. I can't see that you have replied to any messages on this page (your personal "user talk page"). At the very least please reply here to acknowledge that you are getting this message and that I'm not just talking into the vacuum of the internet.
  3. Please take 20 minutes and read our core policy on WP:Neutral point of view, paying special attention to sections 2.3 (Due and undue weight) and 2.4 (Religion). I am very concerned about the neutrality and the sheer volume of material you have added at The Book of Giants#A 'Book of Moses' connection
  4. Please take a few minutes and skim WP:Reliable sources, paying attention to the sections titled "Biased or opinionated sources" and "Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources". We're a bit different from academia here in that we favor secondary sources over primary sources.

And again, please acknowledge that you have received this message. ~Awilley (talk) 13:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It might also be useful to read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Avoid language such as "Of course...." or "See..." Tone is also important - writing in an objective fashion. There's also a common problem many new editors have and that is learning that writing an essay or a paper for a journal is very different from writing a Wikipedia article. Our articles are supposed to present significant opinions/ideas etc in proportion to their significance, without actually making an argument based on using various sources to come to the editor's conclusion. See WP:NOR. I haven't looked at your work in detail but I think I see quite bit of your own analysis in it, both in the body of the text and in your footnotes. By the way, to learn a bit about the background and experience of both Awilley and myself you might want to look at our user page. Doug Weller talk 15:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited House of Joseph (LDS Church), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birthright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Messiah ben Joseph (LDS Church)‎, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Doug Weller talk 18:47, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Messiah ben Joseph (LDS Church)

[edit]

Hello, Chauvelin2000,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bensci54 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Messiah ben Joseph (LDS Church) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Messiah ben Joseph (LDS Church) .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bensci54}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:09, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cosmic Covenant (September 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You need to specify for each section, "Accordingto .... as interpreted by .... Otherwise, the myths here might be misunderstood as facts, and the interpretations as defiite settled conclusions.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 20:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Stillman Pond gravestone2.jpg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Stillman Pond gravestone2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Stillman Pond gravestone3.jpg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Stillman Pond gravestone3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cosmic Covenant concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cosmic Covenant, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Covenants in the Bible

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Chauvelin2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Covenants in the Bible, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Covenants in the Bible

[edit]

Hello, Chauvelin2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Covenants in the Bible".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Salt Lake Temple oxen.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Salt Lake Temple oxen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. mattbr 10:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chauvelin2000&oldid=1258272438"