User talk:Chateau Louis XIV

Chateau Louis XIV, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Chateau Louis XIV! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

MoS

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in New normal, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 00:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why are you adding {{INDEX}} to article pages? — Smjg (talk) 12:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Drafts to main space

If you are going to do this please have the good housekeeping to tidy up after yourself. Please gp back and remove the AFC artefacts you have left behind. Fiddle Faddle 20:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

GeneralNotability (talk) 20:35, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dolmen Group (October 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Timtrent was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Created by indeffed UPE editor

Fiddle Faddle 21:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chateau Louis XIV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a paid editor. I will edit pages according to Wikipedia policies. Sardari Chateau Louis XIV (talk) 07:18, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't believe that you have no connection to the topics you have edited about, and until you choose to be more forthcoming, I see no pathway to you being unblocked at this time. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your connection to the Dolmen Group? 331dot (talk) 09:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no connection with Dolmen group.

I planned to make articles of well known Real estate companies of Pakistan, Steel companies of Pakistan, Cement companies of Pakistan, Banking in Pakistan, Construction in Pakistan, Companies listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange.

Now I will only update existing Wikipedia Articles.

Sardari Chateau Louis XIV (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It may help for you to agree to not edit about Pakistani businesses and tell what topics you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 11:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far as Dolmen Group is concerned, there are already articles available. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolmen_Malls https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolmen_City

I will not make any new articles about anything.

I will only update existing Wikipedia Articles, including Steel, Cement, Banks, Construction, Stocks, Real estate, Automobile, Hospitality, Telecommunication, Aviation, Karachi, Finance, Insurance, Education, Healthcare.

I daily read newspaper, so I will update the articles relevant today. One such article was regarding Dolmen Group, as I created Wikipedia article. I am not a paid editor. I have no connection with Dolmen Group.

Sardari Chateau Louis XIV (talk) 14:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for "Agha Steel"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Agha_Steel

I am not a paid editor. I have no connection with Agha Steel.

Sardari Chateau Louis XIV (talk) 14:27, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will not make any new articles about anything. I will only update existing Wikipedia Articles.

Please unblock.

Sardari Chateau Louis XIV (talk) 14:29, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chateau Louis XIV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a paid editor. I will not create new articles. Sardari Chateau Louis XIV (talk) 16:48, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am with 331dot on this. I do not feel comfortable unblocking at this time. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chateau Louis XIV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:00, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sardari Chateau Louis XIV (talk) 11:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else will review your request, but you will have to give us more than that. 331dot (talk) 11:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chateau Louis XIV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a paid editor. I will follow Wikipedia policies. I will not make new business page. I will make useful contributions. I will not update Dolmen Group article.

Decline reason:

Based on your edits and your past requests, I don't entirely believe you, and am further concerned that even your contributions outside of Dolmen Group have been less than helpful to the encyclopedia. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Whatever

Concern regarding Draft:Dolmen Group

Hello, Chateau Louis XIV. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dolmen Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dolmen Group

Hello, Chateau Louis XIV. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dolmen Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:19, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Agha Steel

Hello, Chateau Louis XIV. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Agha Steel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Agha Steel

Hello, Chateau Louis XIV. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Agha Steel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]