User talk:ChasteRoue

Welcome!

Hello, ChasteRoue, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! - 220.101 talk^\Contribs 17:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. - 220.101 talk^\Contribs 17:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1834 Genocide

The article 1834 Genocide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The term "1834 genocide" appears to have been invented by the author of this article. There is no evidence that it has been used elsewhere. The article appears to be largely a copy of Safed plunder, an article which itself has major unresolved problems.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RolandR (talk) 17:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1838 Genocide

The article 1838 Genocide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The term "1838 genocide" appears to have been invented by the author of this article. There is no evidence that it has been used elsewhere.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RolandR (talk) 17:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1660 Genocide

The article 1660 Genocide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that the term "1660 genocide" exists anywhere; it appears to be an invention of the author of this article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RolandR (talk) 17:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arab persecution of indigenous Jews

The article Arab persecution of indigenous Jews has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Totally unsourced article, which does not even attempt to argue any notability, but instead makes sweeping POV assertions.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RolandR (talk) 18:46, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 20:05, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pogroms carried out by Arabs against Jews

The article Pogroms carried out by Arabs against Jews has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Jonathanwallace (talk) 20:09, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1011 Córdoba Massacre

The article 1011 Córdoba Massacre has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jonathanwallace (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1660 Safed massacre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1660 Safed massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1660 Safed massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jonathanwallace (talk) 06:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History, sources, and your articles

Hi! I've been following your recent new article creations. While some have major POV problems (and these are being discussed actively{, others reflect a sincere desire to expand Wikipedia by covering new topics. Doing what I usually do, I've been seeking out more reliable sources than the ones you've used. This has turned up a new class of problems which I must emphasize is not your fault.

What I'm talking about is this. You've run into short references to significant and notable events, usually in the form of: "there was a pogrom against Jews in place x in year y." Some of these have come from reliable sources on other issues, others have come from compendiums (which we consider tertiary sources on Wikipedia) and some have come from sources that have no particular knowledge of place x at all, but are describing external incidents as background for their real topic (like Benny Morris). So these articles lack truly reliable sources and are therefore not verifiable.

However, when it comes time to fill in more details than the one line in theses sources, surprises appear.

The first big surprise is that some of these events are not pogroms at all, but other sorts of massacres: specifically in the conquest of Fez and the conquest of Cordoba (I'll post the details on the second case soon!). This makes the new article which you created have a misleading title.

The second surprise is that other details have mutated along the chain of citation, which usually involves tertiary source citing tertiary source citing tertiary source. It turns out that the Cordoba massacres were at the end of a 1010-1013 siege, following Berber conquest, and a joint assault on Jews and other residents of the city. Fortunately, Wikipedia's preference for reliable, secondary sources lets us fix this.

I'd like to offer to work with you in incubating 1011 Córdoba pogrom as Siege and fall of Córdoba, if you'd like to keep working on the article. Let me know if you are interested.--Carwil (talk) 14:02, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Thank you for the e-mail. The problem is that the original articles that I titled "massacre" were deemed titled incorrectly and editors wanted pogrom instead. I'd like the help. I'm just trying to spread awareness but there are many editors that want to maintain the "Jews and Muslims lived peacefully together before Zionism" lie. I have no interest in getting involved in an edtiing war over the Arab-Israeli Conflict merely bringing to light massacres against Sephardic/Mizrahic Jews. ChasteRoue

Speedy deletion nomination of Arab persecution of indigenous Jews

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 16:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Muslim crimes against humanity denial

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 16:52, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Muslim crimes against humanity denial

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Muslim crimes against humanity denial, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:57, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crusading

Clearly, you have a point of view to express regarding anti-semitism and Arab-Israeli relations. Wikipedia is not the place to carry this out. Please find a different outlet. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Islam's crimes against humanity denial

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 17:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Islamic war crimes denial

The article Islamic war crimes denial has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to contain any information that is not already in Wikipedia; constitutes WP:SYNTH/WP:OR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 17:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. andy (talk) 17:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:WikiDan61. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. andy (talk) 17:09, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Islamic war crimes denial

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Late Muslim immigration to Ottoman and British Palestine

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Late Muslim immigration to Ottoman and British Palestine, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.shamrak.com/Masada2000-HistoryofPalestine.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Late Muslim immigration to Ottoman and British Palestine and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Late Muslim immigration to Ottoman and British Palestine, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Late Muslim immigration to Ottoman and British Palestine with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Late Muslim immigration to Ottoman and British Palestine. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Late Muslim immigration to Ottoman and British Palestine saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! RolandR (talk) 15:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pogroms carried out by Arabs against Jews for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pogroms carried out by Arabs against Jews is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pogroms carried out by Arabs against Jews until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 18:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

CheckUser evidence confirms that you are both this account and DionysosElysees (talk · contribs) to edit pages (such as Old Yishuv) which are subject to an Arbitration decision. I have therefore blocked both your accounts indefinitely. AGK [•] 23:42, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]