User talk:Charliesheen4

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Little Missouri River (Arkansas) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Little Missouri River (Arkansas) was changed by Charliesheen4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954826 on 2017-03-02T14:26:52+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:26, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Little_Missouri_River_(Arkansas). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GammaRadiator (talk) 14:39, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Charliesheen4, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Charliesheen4! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hugh Hefner, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Hugh Hefner was changed by Charliesheen4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881216 on 2017-03-03T14:16:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:16, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:20, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]