User talk:Charlieo308

January 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Austrian Nazism, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Austrian Nazism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of English irredentism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article English irredentism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English irredentism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mebigrouxboy (talk) 16:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlieo308

Regarding your near-blanking of the page, I should note that the discussion has not yet concluded. You can still lend a hand to the discussion and explain your initial reasons for the creation of the article. Your input would be appreaciated.

P.S, the article isn't really yours to blank; you don't own it. Mebigrouxboy (talk) 01:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 11:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I noticed that in this edit to Republican Fascist Party, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 21:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yakme. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:Yakme have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Yakme (talk) 06:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:Yakme. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:12, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bold abbreviations

Hi. It looks like you are on a quest to make all abbreviations bold in infoboxes right-wing or fascist parties articles. This is not prescribed by WP guidelines, and as far as I can see, it only happens in articles that you are editing. So please stop doing this, and adapt the infobox style to the rest of the non-fascist parties. Also, please never again vandalize my user page. Yakme (talk) 06:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Immediate indef block needed for Charlieo308. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 13:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:23, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]