User talk:Charliecow7

Welcome!

Hello, Charliecow7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! doncram (talk) 21:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clark County, Arkansas

You reverted my edit of this article without any justification or comment. If you have any justification for labelling lynchings as 'common' in Clark County, Arkansas, please make it known. I am quite willing to be corrected if my edit is in error. Until then, I'm reverting. Tallil2long (talk) 23:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I do suggest you do some reading on Clark County, utilizing old newspaper articles instead of relying completely on online sources, which seems to be a bad habit with many on Wikipedia. I simply do not have the time nor the inclination to worry with the Clark County article. However, when I do, I shall revert it to the accurate statements that they were common in the late 19th century, in Clark County, Arkansas. The problem, I have found, is that people from that region tend to prefer ignoring anything negative, unless it is absolutely undeniable. And even then, they tend to fight it. And it is sad that they do not know their own history. Charliecow7

I haven't relied on online sources. Ouachita Baptist University has an extensive collection relating to local and county history... including those old newspapers you mention. I am not currently in the local area to do independent research nor do I have my notes with me, but I have looked somewhat into this matter before. Having said that, I fully recognize the possibility that my research was not complete enough; I'd be interested in seeing a rough list of whatever you find, including sources. As for making blanket assumptions regarding the ignorance of local residents... may I recommend consulting the individuals rather than your stereoptype of them? I will gladly share my email address for off-site correspondence. Please let me know.

Tallil2long (talk) 15:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When I have time to return to the Clark County section, I will pass everything along to you. Also, understand that it is not my desire to make anyone or any place appear in a bad light. Quite the contrary. I came upon Clark County Arkansas quite by accident while researching massacres, namely the Huntsville Massacre, in Huntsville, Arkansas, and by way of massacres I fell onto the Liquica Church Massacre, which moved me to Clark County's page by way of an investigator that worked on that case who was originally from Amity, Arkansas, in Clark County. From there I began to research, simply on a whim, Clark County in the 19th century, which is typically my area of interest as far as timelines go. From that research, I fell into the 3rd Arkansas, and built an article on that celebrated Arkansas Confederate regiment, and several other Arkansas American Civil War regiments. I found that one had regiment originated in Clark County, and also found that two men of Clark County had been awarded the Confederate Medal of Honor. It simply snowballed from there. I feel that Clark County has a rich history during this period that is all but unknown, or seemingly so, although maybe I am mistaken as I have never been there. I did contact Ouachita Baptist University, seeking information on how the county sheriff Joseph Hulsey, preceding Sheriff James H. Abraham, had died. However, I hit a non-interested, and albeit lack of knowledge, in regards to 19th century Clark County history, which was disappointing. In any event, I will be happy to pass anything along to you. Thank you for your interest, and I hope it continues. Charliecow7

Notability of Rose Wood

A tag has been placed on Rose Wood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 12:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe the article should not have been deleted, you can contest it at deletion review, explaining why you believe she is notable. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP Actors

HI Charlie. Your welcome to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. PLease add your name to the list and learn the ropes. Please use an actor infobox if you can. Regards!. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^Talk? 15:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Agnes of Glasgow

A tag has been placed on Agnes of Glasgow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 14:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It falls under American folklore in notability. I thought the purpose of Wikipedia is information? If not, then it is a waste of time to have Wikipedia. If this article is deleted, it will be researched further, and added yet again with more information. Research articles that I have placed on here in the past, and you will see that I research as thorough as possible. Charliecow7

The speedy deletion tag has been removed from the article, as another user believes that the article makes a claim of notability. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jane Ross (businesswoman)

I have nominated Jane Ross (businesswoman), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Ross (businesswoman). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. DarkAudit (talk) 20:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention. Jane Ross was one of the wealthiest women in Arkansas during her lifetime. I simply did not have the time to research it more thoroughly last night. Today I will add references which should satisfy the wikipedia guidelines. If you investigate any previous articles I have submitted, I believe you'll find that I'm quite thorough. Charliecow7

There's little use in adding the {{hangon}} notice to the article; it has not been nominated for speedy deletion. Instead, you can contribute to the debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Ross (businesswoman). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

James Black

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to James Black, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. haz (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So because of the ONE change I made, which was that his wife died of illness, you reverted EVERYTHING I DID? The main thing I was doing was setting the article up into catagories, which I will again do, and thanks for wasting the last 20 minutes work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charliecow7 (talk • contribs) 13:56, 30 January 2008

The edits reverted can easily be viewed, accessed and restored in the page's history. However, much of what you have added contains grammatical and spelling errors. Make sure that you check all of your edits with the "preview" and "show changes" buttons before saving the new version. You may also wish to have a quick read through Wikipedia's guide to citing sources, because unsourced material (especially in biographical articles) is liable to be removed. If you have any queries or want help with anything, get in touch. haz (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Under Construction

I suggest you using Template:Underconstruction to show that you have full intentions on coming back to things. That might help you out in terms of your articles being tagged for deletion. If that doesnt help you out, peruse the templates for the under constructions... they save tons of aggrevation! :) Queerbubbles (talk) 15:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Charliecow7

Don Jonz

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Don Jonz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Don Jonz. BlueValour (talk) 22:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hot Springs and Gunfight

Very interesting. You might want to look at WP:CITE to help your material meet verifiability requirements. The makeref tool is handy for several citation types, and creates stuff you can cut and paste on the end of sentences. Then adding {{reflist}} in the ==References== will show the sources. Details are in WP:FOOT and WP:CITET. Incidentally, you might be interested in this NY Times article. -- SEWilco (talk) 23:04, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Texas

I saw that you are creating articles on Texas-related topics. You might consider joining WP:WikiProject Texas - we can always use more members, especially those interested in history. I appreciate that you are interested in history too; sometimes I feel like I'm the only one. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions about anything. Karanacs (talk) 21:20, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Hi Charliecow7. I've noticed that you've made a lot of additions to some Texas-related articles, specifically those related to the Alamo. As a new user, I wasn't sure if you were aware of the citation policies on Wikipedia. First, be sure to use reliable, independent, third-party sources. Since so much has been written on the Alamo, it is best to use only scholarly book sources rather than web pages, except for current events, when newspapers are also considered reliable sources. The Handbook of Texas is a reliable source, but most other websites are not. Also, when you have found a reliable source, please be sure to use inline citations. These can be done by typing <ref name=mycitationanem>My citation here.</ref>. This page gives more information on the easy way to cite books. You can also look at the Battle of the Alamo article to see a good example of how to do this. There are also a lot of citation templates that can be used to make it easier to cite information. If you have any questions about how to cite sources, please let me know. Karanacs (talk) 14:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not new to Wikipedia. I have numerous additions, hundreds in fact, to wikipedia. I have read extensively on the topics to which you refer, and much of what was in the articles that I changed has been proven incorrect. If the reference that I attached includes the name of a historian, one who has thoroughly researched the Battle of the Alamo, then it is as reliable as any other opinions on the topic, and if you read closely, if there is doubt, I write that there is doubt, or that these opinions are contested. THAT is the purpose of wikipedia, to inform, from all angles. Yes, much has been written about the battle, but much of what has been written, including much of what I edited, was the same as what was taught in schools when I was a youth. Those facts have long since been proven incorrect. Charliecow7

The problem is that while the websites may be accurate, they are not considered reliable sources according to Wikipedia guidelines. That means anyone who goes into an article that you've worked on and wants to bring it to WP:GA or WP:FA status will need to redo the article with sources that do meet the WP guidelines. Inline citations are also expected; by not using those it is more difficult for readers and future editors to figure out where each piece of the article actually came from. I'm working on a project now to get many Texas Revolution related articles to FA status, most importantly Battle of the Alamo, and any help you can provide with reliable sources that are cited with inline citations would be much appreciated. Karanacs (talk) 15:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I see your point. But you must also see mine. Wikipedia can either be one of one thousand sources on the topic, or it can be one that at least tries to cover all the bases, stating the main opinions as they are known. I will help in any way I can, and the last thing I want is to make things difficult for anyone. To be honest, the only reason I fell of into working on articles relating to the Texas Revolution was because, given all that I have read on the topic, Wikipedia was way off on its depiction of that battle. It was almost like watching an old Davey Crockett show from the 1950's, you know its not real, but it is good entertainment. Then there were the articles depicting those who died, and how they died, in addition to other subjects relating to the survivors. As they were written, prior to my changes, they were way off. There were several eye witnesses to the battle, not simply Susannah Dickinson and the former slave Joe, but most of the other accounts were from Mexicans, and have long since been ignored. Those accounts are in numerous books on the subject, most of which I have read, although there may only be obscure versions of them online. In any event, not to debate this and not to draw it out any more than necessary, the last thing I want to do is to cause problems for the editors. And it serves little purpose for me to put in much effort, if it will only be reverted. I do, however, hope you see my point. Charliecow7

I definitely agree with your assessment of many of these articles before you began work on them, and I think your changes have vastly improved a lot of the Alamo coverage. I'd just like to encourage you to use inline citations with the sources you currently find (it looks complicated but you get the hang of it quickly) and/or find sources that WP deems more reliable. Karanacs (talk) 14:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. And thank you for your advice, and I shall make my best efforts to comply. Charliecow7

thanks for developing Sierra Bonita Ranch, Arizona

Hi Charliecow7 -- I noticed your helpful edit back on 10 July 2008 to the Sierra Bonita Ranch article. I had created that article about a U.S. National Historic Landmark and had added a comprehensive NRHP inventory/nomination reference, which you used. Thanks for taking the time to do that!

Also, I've started stub articles and added similar references to many other articles on National Historic Landmarks. It would be great if you were interested in developing any other stubs on List of NHLs in AZ or in other states (indexed by List of NHLs by state. There are about 2,400 NHLs and on-line docs are available for almost all of them. WikiProject National Register of Historic Places members completed a drive to at least start all the NHL articles by last July 4, by the way. Please ask me if you have any questions. Anyhow, thanks again. doncram (talk) 21:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Patricia Harnage

I have nominated Patricia Harnage, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Harnage. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. لenna vecia 12:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John L. Barkley

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John L. Barkley, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.legionofvalor.com/citation_parse.php?uid=1106628881. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Wallace

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fort Wallace, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kancoll.org/khq/1977/77_1_hurt.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Charliecow7! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 158 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Lisa Katselas Paré - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:41, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Rhonda Jo Petty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Holmes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links in article '3rd Arkansas Infantry Regiment'

Hi. The article '3rd Arkansas Infantry Regiment' has some dead links that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix them?

Dead: http://members.cox.net/preston1863/history.html

You added this in January 2008.
This copy from the archives might be good.

Dead: http://www.morningsidebooks.com/cgi/bookshop/articles.cgi?cat=2&issue=14&article=5&userid=$id

You added this in January 2008.
The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

Dead: http://pages.suddenlink.net/camp246/3rdhist.htm

You added this in January 2008.
The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

Dead: http://ranger95.com/civil_war/arkansas_csa/infantry/3rd_ark_inf_regt.html

You added this in January 2008.
The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

These links are marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots|deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 06:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mary Lee (actor)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mary Lee (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgpaulus (talk) 15:37, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was fooled by the recent vandalism, didn't look back in the history far enough, and tagged the article for speedy deletion (my mistake; I apologize). I've reverted the article back to a clean version, but do I need to do more to "un-request" the deletion? -- Bgpaulus (talk) 15:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1st Arkansas Cavalry (Union) - Updating

I'm planning on expanding the article making use to two articles from North & South Magazine. However before I do so I would like to query the sources you have used. I was wondering if you could clarify how you used the two web articles you mentioned as references in the article.Graham1973 (talk) 14:51, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kitty Mannock

A tag has been placed on Kitty Mannock requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unremarkable fictional person

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Edward321 (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Almaron Dickinson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Almaron Dickinson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almaron Dickinson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Si Trew (talk) 00:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clarence L. Maxwell

The article Clarence L. Maxwell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Bio of person of doubtful notability lacking adequate sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 09:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peggy Drake

The article Peggy Drake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fail WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sonofstar (talk) 16:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]