User talk:ChamarVeer

Welcome

Hello, ChamarVeer, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

ChamarVeer, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:08, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert notice

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

- NitinMlk (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In spite of my explanations at User talk:DalitRaj and User talk:BhaujanStar, you are making same type of BLP violations and other problematic edits. So please carefully read my posts at those talk pages, esp. User_talk:BhaujanStar#Mentioning_caste_of_living_people. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added anything which violates or vandalises the article. I have even gave proper citations or references also to my edits. ChamarVeer (talk) 06:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have glanced over your edits and they have the same issues as that of the previous accounts. Here are some examples:

Misrepresentations:

With this edit, you added Mahar caste, but the cited source doesn't support the claim.
With this edit, you added Mahar caste, but the cited source mentions Mala (caste).
With this edit, you added Mahar caste, but the cited source doesn't support the claim. It is also a BLP violation, as the mention of caste requires self-identification in BLPs – see here for details.
With this edit, you added Mahar caste, but the cited source doesn't support the claim. It is also a BLP violation.
With this edit, you added Dalit caste, but the cited source doesn't support the claim.
With this edit, you added Namasudra caste, but the cited source doesn't support the claim. It is also a BLP violation.
With this edit, you added Namasudra caste, but the cited source doesn't mention that he is a Namasudra. It is also a BLP violation.
With this edit, you added Meghwal caste, but the cited source doesn't support the claim. It is also a BLP violation.
With this edit, you added Pasi (caste), but the cited source doesn't support the claim.

BLP violations:

Although I have already listed multiple examples of BLP violation by you, here are some more examples: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], etc.

Finally, regarding unreliable sources, with this edit, you cited Postcard News article – which is non-HISTRS user-generated content – for a history-related detail. Note that the Postcard News is also listed at List of fake news websites. Similarly, with this edit, you introduced another UGC. You have also introduced some links of Isha/Kalpaz Publications, e.g. see here and here. Please note that the Gyan/Isha/Kalpaz Publications are considered unreliable on this project, as they regularly plagiarise Wikipedia – see here & here for details. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have clarified to you multiple times at your different accounts regarding the introduction of caste in BLPs. But you are constantly ignoring that advice and have created a large number of BLP violations. The latest example being this edit. So I request you again to not add caste in a BLP unless the subject self-identify with it. Also, please read my previous comments on this page regarding reliable sources. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 16:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashok Khade has been accepted

Ashok Khade, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiAviator (talk) 03:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shilpkar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shilpkar, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:19, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Self-published sources aren't usable, one source there was just some random website. Another source appears to be a reader-submitted piece but it's not clear. As NitinMlk mentioned to you above, you can't say a person belongs to a caste unless you have a reliable source for that. Please see WP:BLP. – Thjarkur (talk) 22:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhanna Singh Gulshan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nirmal Singh. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shilpkar (1)

Hello, ChamarVeer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shilpkar (1), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shilpkar (1)

Hello, ChamarVeer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shilpkar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]