User talk:Cgpitt
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Pittsburgh/The_Archaeologist_Looks_at_Death_(Fall_2020) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Cgpitt, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:12, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Hi Cgpitt!
This is Megan, logged in as Mswintosky for the Peer Review on your article of choice, Bog Bodies.
I checked out your sandbox and it looks like you are off to a pretty good start! Your references seem legit and like a good starting point for adding to the already existing article. I saw that you already added a cited portion to the lead section, which was a great addition and is a good clarifying point to the mention of the acidic conditions of the bogs that was already there. I also saw that you left me a message explaining that you would add more info towards the end of the week, so keep up the good work!
As for things to improve on or new directions I would suggest trying, you may want to look into citing the photographs already posted in the article. This is a super easy way to add some references and perhaps stumble upon new content to add to the article. Additionally, if there is no mention of the published photos in the article itself, that could be a good thing to add. I also noticed when reading the article that there are many geographical areas mentioned that these bog bodies have been discovered, but there is only one section specifically dedicated to North America. It may be a good idea to reorganize the pre-existing information into geographically-separate sections. This reorganization may make it easier to see which sites are lacking in content compared to the others. You mentioned in your sandbox draft that you want to look into adding references to the notable bog bodies section, which I think is a good idea as well. I saw that there is already an entire wiki page linked there, so it'll be easy to pull references from that article.
Keep up the good work! Mswintosky (talk) 18:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Megan