User talk:Certificationsaccess
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Joji discography
- added a link pointing to IRMA
- Miley Cyrus discography
- added a link pointing to IRMA
- Zayn Malik discography
- added a link pointing to IRMA
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:53, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aurora (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DL.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Use accurate edit summaries
[edit]Certificationsaccess, we have had this discussion before. Why are you using the edit summary "Fixed." for this? How is removing certifications from a discography that yes, shouldn't be there because they're not certifications for countries with charts listed on the page, a fix? Please start accurately or better describing what you did to editors. There is no point in using an edit summary if you can't describe what you did. Also, you are still using the summary "added peak" for when you're just changing a peak. There's a difference between adding a chart position that was not there previously versus updating one. Please do better. Thank you. Ss112 02:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, and many thanks, as always, for cutting in before me to update a few artists' peaks, like SZA, Ariana and Zayn. Funny how you waited until you noticed me start doing it before doing it yourself, when the Danish charts updated several hours ago. Not obvious at all. Ss112 02:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Ss112: you're welcome.
- I have pings turned off, so I don't get notifications when you use re or ping templates. Just a note for future in case you want to leave any more snide replies. Not surprising for you though. Ss112 02:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Ss112: I wasn't being snide with my reply. You know I love you, respect you and had learnt much from you. Yet, as you said yourself, we've had this discussion before. I truly didn't notice you were already editing Danish charts only because I'm not used to check if the page is being edited by someone else, which means I didn't do it on purpose. It has been a long time since I stopped making editions at the same time as you, so don't feel attacked if it happens once in a while, I really didn't mean it. Sorry.
- About the other topic: thank you for updating me about my wrong edit summary. I've been using "fixed" and "added peak" because I thought it was the right thing to write. I'll "do better" and detail more from now on. Once again, you're welcome (as a "non-snide" reply, just in case you missunderstand it).
- I have pings turned off, so I don't get notifications when you use re or ping templates. Just a note for future in case you want to leave any more snide replies. Not surprising for you though. Ss112 02:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Marking edits as minor
[edit]Please don't mark large removals of content like this as "minor". Please see Help:Minor edit for what constitutes a minor edit. Ss112 03:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- You are still doing this, and again here. These are not minor edits, so stop marking them as such. Ss112 14:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)