Jump to content

User talk:Ceranthor/Archive 29

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 25←Archive 27Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30Archive 31

WikiJournal import

Hello, I've imported the Mount Mazama article to v:WikiJournal_Preprints/Mount_Mazama. When you have filled in the {{author info}} template at the top (usually easiest in visualeditor), made any changes and are ready to submit, simply fill in the authorship declaration form. All the best, T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 00:44, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

@Evolution and evolvability: Will get to this tomorrow! ceranthor 22:51, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
@Evolution and evolvability: There may be a bit of an over-reliance on Harris (2005), which is ultimately just a survey and not by itself a superbly scholarly source. I will do my best to replace it where I can and see where that takes me. ceranthor 16:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
@Ceranthor: Excellent stuff. Let me know how it goes. I look forward to seeing it as it evolves. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 22:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).

Administrator changes

readded Al Ameer son • Randykitty • Spartaz
removed Boson • Daniel J. Leivick • Efe • Esanchez7587 • Fred Bauder • Garzo • Martijn Hoekstra • Orangemike

Interface administrator changes

removedDeryck Chan

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
  • A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
  • A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
  • Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

Obituaries

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

On WP:UAA

Responded. Please read what I said there. Thank you! :) Neot/c 15:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

@Neolytical: I already responded there. ceranthor 15:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, didn't notice! I'm a bit unfocused right now and didn't see the ping when I was typing this. :( Neot/c 15:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
No worries. Dlohcierekim got to it. ceranthor 15:42, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Damn, you beat me :D

I was just about to tag User:C_o_o_n_king for CSD but you beat me to it by about 5 seconds. I'll beat you to it sometime... Happy Editing! Kb03 (talk) 14:11, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Ha, sorry for stealing your thunder. :) ceranthor 14:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hogg Rock

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hogg Rock you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jo-Jo Eumerus -- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hogg Rock

The article Hogg Rock you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hogg Rock for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jo-Jo Eumerus -- Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, Jo-Jo. ceranthor 14:23, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Gern geschehen. Probably won't be able to do much in the next few weeks as African humid period looks like a megaproject, though.
Incidentally, do you know of ways to attract interest to a FAC? I know, I tend to offer more stuff for others to review rather than reviewing things myself but the pace so far on Limalok has been glacial. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:22, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
​ I think it's a problem of FAC as a whole that noms tend to take a while to get reviews from more than one or two people. In the past, I've nominated things for peer review first to get feedback so those people generally are happy to give additional feedback, having already invested some time in reading the article beforehand. Since that wouldn't apply here, my best advice would be to ask one of the delegates if you could list it at the FAC Urgents page. ceranthor 17:53, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Blackstone Resources Battery Codes

Hi Cerathor,

You deleted a page I had written and blocked a username I created. I'm sure they were the right decisions to make. Apologies on my behalf. I'm new to Wikipedia.

The copyright infringement was actually on a paper I had authored myself. I'm the CEO and Chairman of Blackstone Resources. I've created a new username under my own name. I would really appreciate some advise on how to bring this page to life in the correct way. AI took ages writing this page and sourcing everything, and making the tables was really hard. I'm happy to draft something in the sandbox first and show you if that is better.

Warmest regards,

Ulrich — Preceding unsigned comment added by UlrichErnstCH (talk • contribs) 15:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

@UlrichErnstCH: Sticking to the sandbox would be fine. But I can't restore the text exactly as it was since it had copyright violations. I'm happy to post the tables in your sandbox if you would like that. ceranthor 15:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)


Thanks Cerathor,

That would be great thank you, if you could leave the tables in my sandbox. What do I do to avoid the copyright violations? I've written the paper myself i.e. the pdf you reference. I've also tried to make the paper open source under a creative commons license. I'm so sorry, I'm new to this. I'm better at academic research. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Warmest regards,

James — Preceding unsigned comment added by UlrichErnstCH (talk • contribs) 18:12, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

@UlrichErnstCH: You can't just copy/paste the text, since it appears on a website that is not free-use. I will add the tables to User:UlrichErnstCH/sandbox. Let me know if you have other questions. ceranthor 18:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Cerathor,

I hope you had a good start to the year. I've had another go at writing this page. Before I move it out of draft, would you have time to review it?

Warmest regards,

Uli

@UlrichErnstCH: I think it's good enough to submit as an Articles for Creation submission through the article wizard, since you have a COI with the company. Let me know if you need any more help! ceranthor 14:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec18a}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.

ϢereSpielChequers 14:12, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

@WereSpielChequers: Thank you. Hope all is well, my friend! Happy holidays to you as well. ceranthor 14:24, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 2007 Alum Rock earthquake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2007 Alum Rock earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Alum Rock earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dawnseeker2000 20:06, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lordsundaylogo.PNG

Notice

The file File:Lordsundaylogo.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 05:19, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Willy1018, thanks for the notice. I went ahead and deleted it myself - I'd forgotten this existed! :) ceranthor 16:47, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Margaret

Hi. I just finished working on the 'Artistry' section of the article and was hoping that you could take a look at it. I don't want to clutter the article with too many redundant information so if you think that something should go please let me know. I'm also worried about the style as I think it might be too informal. Also although quotes they are translated from Polish so if there are any grammar mistakes or something doesn't make sense also let me know or just go ahead and correct it. Hope to hear back from you soon. Happy Holidays. ArturSik (talk) 21:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

@ArturSik: Thanks - will get to this ASAP. ceranthor 13:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
@ArturSik: I think it's fine! The first paragraph starts off a bit choppy, but I don't think it's anything to be concerned about. Let me know if you have other concerns. ceranthor 15:48, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. Tbf I was most concerned about the second paragraph cause that's the new one but from what I see you haven't changed there anything. I'm still not sure about the use of 'thanks' in this sentence: "Margaret has the potential of a smooth jazz singer thanks to the "exceptional purity of her voice" and "interesting timbre."" I don't know what other word I could replace it with but I'm worried it might be a bit too informal. what do you think ? ArturSik (talk) 16:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
What about "due to" or "because of"? ceranthor 16:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
changed it to "due to". thanks:) ArturSik (talk) 16:34, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
no problem. Glad I could be helpful. ceranthor 16:42, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Austral season's greetings

Austral season's greetings
Tuck into this! We've made about three of these in the last few days for various festivities. Supermarkets are stuffed with cheap berries. Season's greetings! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, Cas! ceranthor 13:51, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry holidays

Hello Ceranthor: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
Thanks, Jo-Jo! ceranthor 13:51, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Ceranthor!

Happy New Year!

Ceranthor,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 23:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Thank you, SkyGazer 512! You as well. ceranthor 23:25, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

Hello Ceranthor: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great New Year! Cheers, Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 00:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Thank you, Walk Like an Egyptian. Happy new year to you too! ceranthor 23:26, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyS712 -- DannyS712 (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ceranthor. You have new messages at Talk:Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington)/GA1.
Message added 03:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DannyS712 (talk) 03:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, DannyS712. I'll get to your comments today hopefully! ceranthor 14:42, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

GA mentor

Hey, I found your name on the GA mentor list. I just reviewed my first GA. I found the article to not be broad enough and listed a number of questions. I was just wondering if you could give me any feedback on my review of this article. Thanks, Theodor Langhorne Franklin (talk) 22:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Theodor Langhorne Franklin, I think your review is appropriate and sufficiently detailed. I think you are right that the article could be more comprehensive - if you want me to keep an eye on the review as it progresses, please let me know. Happy to help. ceranthor 14:03, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. The article has been updated considerably and looks a lot better to me. Can you take a look when you get a chance? I appreciate your input. Theodor Langhorne Franklin (talk) 03:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Theodor Langhorne Franklin, sure. I will try to look today but it might take me a few days. ceranthor 15:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
OK, that would be helpful for me if you could take a look in the near future. Theodor Langhorne Franklin (talk) 02:36, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Theodor Langhorne Franklin - sorry for the delay. I will look today. ceranthor 14:09, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
@Theodor Langhorne Franklin: I think I agree. It does still seem a bit short, but the sheer number of references and the changes made suggest to me that it's probably comprehensive enough to be a good article now. ceranthor 14:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Yes, there were a lot of improvements. I passed the GA nomination. I appreciate your input as it helps affirm my decision-making process. Theodor Langhorne Franklin (talk) 01:43, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
@Theodor Langhorne Franklin: Of course. Also, it's no burden if you want to ask for my input on the next few GANs you review either. Best, ceranthor 02:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Wanted to thank you for your helpful advice and kind approach during the FA process. PS: did you receive the email I sent you a few days ago? - LouisAragon (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

@LouisAragon: congratulations on the promotion!!! I just saw it - thanks for your kind words. Looking forward to working together in 2019 and beyond! ceranthor 21:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Likewise!! :-) - LouisAragon (talk) 20:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ceranthor. You have new messages at Talk:Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington)/GA1.
Message added 01:20, 4 January 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DannyS712 (talk) 01:20, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

@DannyS712: I have responded or acted on your comments. ceranthor 16:52, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
There are some new ones --DannyS712 (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington)

The article Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyS712 -- DannyS712 (talk) 00:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington)

The article Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyS712 -- DannyS712 (talk) 20:21, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

@DannyS712: Thanks for putting up with my questions and replies! ceranthor 23:04, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
No problem --DannyS712 (talk) 23:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Huaynaputina

Greetings,

I recall that last year or so you proposed that we should jointly expand Huaynaputina to FA status. While I do not currently have time for extensive work on that topic (and I prefer to see 1257 Samalas eruption pass FAC first, as it could be an useful template for a Huaynaputina article), I was wondering if you are still interested and whether we could hammer out a time plan for this if so. I was also eyeing Coropuna, El Misti and Monowai Seamount but the latter will be difficult due to source access issues. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:56, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Have a few things on the docket right now. Maybe in February? March? What do you think? ceranthor 02:50, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
That would work. We'd probably need to hammer out how to split the work. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:20, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Sounds good. I think I'll be free by February once I get Newberry Volcano to FAC. Do you have a preference for certain sections? You tend to pay more attention to lithology and petrography than I do in volcano articles, but I'm happy to take on anything and to start compiling sources. I have access to most of them thru work/school access. ceranthor 15:54, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
That's going to be somewhat difficult. Usually I work from the sources forward, scanning each source for information that is worth including; that's why the resulting text is often densely packed with references and has some kludgy wording/typos. Maybe you could work with sources that are behind paywalls such as Wiley articles and those which aren't on Google Scholar while I work with the other ones? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
That could work. We can think about it a bit more once we approach February; say, next weekend? ceranthor 18:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Seems good to me. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: I've also listed Newberry Volcano for PR here if you have some spare time to give feedback. ceranthor 18:46, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Commented on that and will write something more today. Beyond the writing question, I was wondering if a finished Huaynaputina could be co-nominated at FAC together with Coropuna; that article needs a bit of update though with new sources and probably a handier citation format. Always tough to rewrite an adequate article rather than a poor (poorly written or stubby) one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
I wonder, would it be a better idea to write up a wholly new thing and c&p it over the current text or to try and expand on the existing one? Talking about Coropuna still. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
@Jo-Jo Eumerus: I can look over it today and let you know, though generally I think it's better to expand on existing drafts. ceranthor 13:28, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Jo-Jo Eumerus, wanted to check in with you about this. I'm mostly finishing up with immediate projects, with just a bunch of longer-term goals on the docket. Where do you stand for availability? ceranthor 16:47, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
As coincidence has it, I get a few days holiday starting this weekend, so I am good on "availability". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
I've begun to assemble a list of sources in Talk:Huaynaputina; the "bibliography" is simply a list of sources that I wouldn't use either due to lack of access or because they are theses and thus not entirely reliable. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Come to think about this, seeing as Huaynaputina has already a substantial amount of (so-so) text would you prefer to write something from scratch or to expand on the existing text? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Bumping as I am not sure on this still. JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 23:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
@Jo-Jo Eumerus and JoJo Eumerus mobile: Likely rework the text and expand. ceranthor 01:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

OK then. I'll probably begin to work on that in the next few weeks (need to recover from the User:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Qurupuna effort). I'll see today if I can get some more comments about Wikipedia:Peer review/Newberry Volcano/archive1 as there is some more to say than what I did. Also, Wikipedia:Peer review/1257 Samalas eruption/archive1. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hayrick Butte

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hayrick Butte you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, Wilhelmina Will. I look forward to it. ceranthor 15:39, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rocky Butte

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rocky Butte you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 13:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rocky Butte

The article Rocky Butte you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rocky Butte for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 04:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sand Mountain Volcanic Field

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sand Mountain Volcanic Field you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 08:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

User page blanking

Hi Ceranthor, you had denied this CSD. But now it has been blanked. Is this edit by User456541 acceptable ? I dont see any valid reason as per Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Courtesy_blanking for this. --DBigXrayᗙ 18:11, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

@DBigXray: Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I rv'd, though I think it was in good faith. I don't see any reason to blank it either. ceranthor 23:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind reply. yes, Even I meant it as AGF edit by User456541 but something that is not supported by policies, even if they implied their edit was policy supported.--DBigXrayᗙ 23:12, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sand Mountain Volcanic Field

The article Sand Mountain Volcanic Field you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sand Mountain Volcanic Field for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 13:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hayrick Butte

The article Hayrick Butte you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hayrick Butte for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Olallie Butte

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Olallie Butte you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 05:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Boring Lava Field

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boring Lava Field you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Squeamish Ossifrage -- Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).

Administrator changes

added Enterprisey • JJMC89
readded BorgQueen
removed Harro5 • Jenks24 • Graft • R. Baley

Interface administrator changes

removedEnterprisey

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
  • Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.

Technical news

  • A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

First time GA review (Hemothorax) - your mentoring help would be appreciated.

Hi Ceranthor, I found your name on the list of those willing to help / mentor with first time GA reviews so here I am. I've written a few GAs / GA noms so I hope that I understand the general process. I've made a start reviewing Hemothorax. My general impression is that the article isn't ready for GA yet and feels a bit thin and half-baked. I'd be very grateful to know what you think about the article and about how I've started the review. Thanks, PeaBrainC (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Very sorry for not responding in a timely fashion; PeaBrainC. I agree that it seems thin and might need to be a decent bit more comprehensive to become a GA. Besides the management section, I would think there would be more content available to discuss in more detail within each section within the article. ceranthor 13:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Ceranthor. It's been more than a week and there's been very little response from the Nominator so I think I'm going to fail it. Out of interest, after reviewing and making comments on areas for improvement, would you generally put an article that needs a lot of work like this one on hold or would you fail it outright from the start? PeaBrainC (talk) 17:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
@PeaBrainC: In a perfect world, it should be consistent for both experienced and new GA nominators. I try to give articles that need a lot of work the same optimism for improvement that I do regular GA nominators, so I avoid quick-failing unless the nominator has been inactive or the article falls so short of the GA criteria that sufficient improvement would likely require more than a week of work. ceranthor 17:25, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 Reminder

Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you have signed up to compete in this year's WikiCup! There are about 2 weeks left before the first round ends – if you haven't yet made your first submission, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, Gerda! ceranthor 13:38, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ceranthor/Archive_29&oldid=998729751"