User talk:Century Plant Guy

Protected edit request on 10 August 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hi, I notice that you claimed that this Century Plant Guy to be a sockpuppet of McAusten, User:McAusten, McAustin or whatever you call him. I can guarantee you that he is definitely NOT a sockpuppet of McAusten and therefore probably must be a sockpuppet of a different block user. I know that as a fact because you didn't revoke his talk page unlike a sockpuppet of McAusten's would have their talk page access revoked and also if you look at his contributions, there are no edits on the 2011 AFL season talk page or any edits on archived pages that mentioned McAusten with the edit summary: "McAusten, NOT User:McAusten!". So can you please delete or remove this from his user page: {{checkedsockpuppet|McAusten}} and look into this more further as I can 110% guarantee you that this user is most definitely NOT a sockpuppet of McAusten. Many Thanks for your time, 195.211.155.86 (talk) 08:50, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Tiptoety: Any thoughts on this? — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 13:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Seeing as there's been no word from Tiptoety yet, I'll answer this myself. If Century Plant Guy wants to contest the block, they can do so with the {{unblock}} template. If they want to get an admin to alter the tag you mention, then they can use {{edit protected}} to argue their case. But I'm not willing to go through the process of reviewing Century Plant Guy's edits unless they request it themselves, and even then only if they give me a good reason to suspect that Tiptoety's decision was in error. As neither of those things are true here, I'm closing this request with no action taken. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{♪ talk ♪} 13:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 22 August 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hi, I notice that you claimed that this Century Plant Guy to be a sockpuppet of McAusten, User:McAusten, McAustin or whatever you call him. I can guarantee you that he is definitely NOT a sockpuppet of McAusten and therefore probably must be a sockpuppet of a different block user. I know that as a fact because you didn't revoke his talk page unlike a sockpuppet of McAusten's would have their talk page access revoked and also if you look at his contributions, there are no edits on the 2011 AFL season talk page or any edits on archived pages that mentioned McAusten with the edit summary: "McAusten, NOT User:McAusten!". So can you please delete or remove this from his user page: {{checkedsockpuppet|McAusten}} and look into this more further as I can 110% guarantee you that this user is most definitely NOT a sockpuppet of McAusten. Many Thanks for your time, 104.143.21.35 (talk) 12:17, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The {{edit protected}} template is not for requesting review of a WP:SPI case. If Century Plant Guy (talk · contribs) wishes to be unblocked, that user needs to log in and use the {{unblock}} template. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have forgotten my password and unable to log in. I'm not a hundred percent sure that my e-mail is saved in my preferences, anyway my e-mail address is centuryplantguy@hotmail.com if you can able to reset my password for me. Thank you.

We cannot help you with that. Also, I have to note that in your last edit you were speaking of Century Plant Guy as "this Century Plant Guy" and "he" while referring to yourself as "I", indicating he's not you. Even if we could, we wouldn't hand out account passwords on such evidence. Huon (talk) 11:02, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) See Help:Reset password, but if your email address is not saved, there is nothing to be done. For obvious security reasons, a new password will only be sent to an already-registered email address. JohnCD (talk) 11:11, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Century Plant Guy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am honestly Century Plant Guy, I am most definitely not this "McAusten" guy and I honestly forgotten my password in order to log in. Therefore I must appeal my block via an IP address. The protect edit requests are definitely not me, however the {{Help me}} request was definitely me. I honestly don't know where Tiptoety got this idea that I'm a so called "sockpuppet" of this user. I don't even know who this "McAusten" fellow is! I only ever did one edit on Agave americana. If I advocated too much with my edit on this article, I do apologize myself and therefore promise not to do it again. I main intention is to improve the plant articles on Wikipedia and I if you honestly look further into this, you can that I am most definitely not this person that you think I am. Please unblock me and remove this from my user page: Thank you for your time.

Decline reason:

Since you don't seem to get the point that this isn't going to happen, and this is getting tedious, I'm semiprotecting this talk page. Kinu ^t/_c 16:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.