User talk:Celcom

Welcome!

Hello, Celcom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Thanks for the photo you added to splade! -SCEhard T 15:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket Lightning or Rocket-triggered Lightning

Hi Celcom. On February 21 you added [1] a picture of what you labeled "rocket lightning". Just to clarify, did you mean "rocket lightning" or "rocket-triggered lightning"? Cardamon 02:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cardmon. The original photo was an 8 second exposure at F/2.8. The vertical shaft of light in the centre of the image seemed to correspond to the "Rocket Lightning" description found on the Wikipedia Lightning page. It was not caused by a rocket. Celcom

Hi Celcom. I live in Tuggeranong and I saw this really weird looking white cloud which I guess would have to have been hanging over QBN/JBM. I filmed some of it at 8:33 P.M. (Our time) and this all took place on 26/02/2008. Any clues as to what on earth that kinda lightning is called? - TuggBoy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.10.29 (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I'm not a lightning expert, I just like getting a good time exposure. I use the "lightning" page to classify my photos. Regards

NowCommons: File:William Farrer.jpg

File:William Farrer.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:William Farrer (1).jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:William Farrer (1).jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qcc 1927.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Queanbeyan City Council Chambers.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black Swans Canberra.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Black Swans Canberra.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vapour shadow.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Vapour shadow.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bungendore Wind Farm

Can you tidy up the image you put in the Bungendore entry? The pic is placed so it overlaps with other images, and I don't know enough about image placement to sort it myself. Cheers DermottBanana (talk) 00:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Information, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 01:24, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Zillmere046.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Zillmere046.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Celcom. You have new messages at Ww2censor's talk page.
Message added 04:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ww2censor (talk) 04:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Architecture debt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Architecture debt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. N^oformation ^Talk 04:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:Not a dictionary#Neologisms. JohnCD (talk) 10:29, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:BigPotato.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:BigPotato.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Aspley.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Aspley.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:APOLLOROAD.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:APOLLOROAD.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Karabar.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Karabar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Cicada se aust.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:34, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Celcom. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:NVISION08Mythbusters.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NVISION08Mythbusters.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 09:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:AHSCentaurCaloundra.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AHSCentaurCaloundra.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Celcom. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changes in queanbeyan

Hello Celcom,

I am now residing in Queanbeyan and though you might like to know that the old 'administration building' which has been empty fro at least 32 months, is currently being demolished.

The 'Top Pub' near the station has also been refurbished, and is now glossy black tiles and more after being rough concrete for about 2 years.

220 of ^Borg 06:54, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Redback spider.jpg

The file File:Redback spider.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:GlasshouseMtnsSign.JPG

The file File:GlasshouseMtnsSign.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not free as claimed by uploader. Belongs to Queensland Government. Would fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request / Photograph Potato statue / Amsterdam exhibition

Hi Celcom,

I hope this message reaches you well.

We would like to include one of your photographs in an exhibition in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Would you be so kind to send me a message on my Wikipedia account with your email address, so we can send you a more elaborate explanation of the concept?

Thank you in advance,

Best,

W. Gutierrez Wjgm (talk) 14:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Which photo would you be interested in using, most of my contributed photos seem to have been collected up onto the Collective commons? Celcom (talk) 07:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]