User talk:CeceliaXIV

License tagging for File:Recruiting poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Recruiting poster.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Recruiting poster.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Recruiting poster.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 18:14, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! CeceliaXIV, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 15:17, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mexican Drug Cartel Propaganda.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dalisays (talk) 03:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Narco tank.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Narco tank.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:03, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda in the Mexican Drug War

Hello, Cecelia.

I was reading the article you created and I noticed that there is a lot of original research (see:WP:ORIGINAL). Most of the citations listed in the article do not necessarily talk about the "propaganda" in Mexico's drug war; in fact, I had never heard that phrase until you created the article, which makes we wonder how notable the topic is. Narcoculture is one thing, just like narcobanners are another thing. I might rewrite your article entirely. Please go to the article's talk page if you have any questions. ComputerJA (talk) 20:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just replied to your message in the article's talk page. Best, ComputerJA (talk) 03:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Ditto. :) ComputerJA (talk) 16:16, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tammy Duckworth. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Calling your opponent "Duckhart" does not indicate an intention to be neutral or fair in any way. What combat unit did you serve in? --Orange Mike | Talk 13:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talking about the campaign rhetoric between the two candidates is not imposing my point of view. I didn't come

up with the conclusions myself and don't feel they violate any wikipedia standards. --CeceliaXIV (talk) 01:30, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your recent edits to William Enyart have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please don't add this section again. It has been made clear in the edit summaries and on the talk page that it is a WP:BLPCRIME violation. SGMD1 ^Talk/_Contribs 14:29, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Guinta

Thanks for your helpful additions to this article, and to the citations to the local newspapers. I've post-edited them to retain the positions but remove some of the speechifying; the reader who wants Rep. Guinta's complete rationale for his positions can go to the sources. I relocated one of your comments to a different section. Spike-from-NH (talk)

BLPs

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. I've noticed that many of your edits, including to Carol Shea Porter, Pete Gallego, Bill Foster and others do not follow the notability, neutrality and citation guidelines of WP:BLP. Arbor8 (talk) 21:29, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point, but how is quoting individuals violating neutrality?

CeceliaXIV (talk) 15:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that an edit includes an accurate quote doesn't immunize it from point-of-view criticism. For example, networks and commentators often make a deliberately biased presentation, despite their use of accurate quotes, because they decide who and what is quoted. The goal here is not just to present true facts but to paint an accurate picture. So inflammatory quotations about a celebrity need to be put in context (for example, with the opposite viewpoint) or else they will seem to be unquestionable or typical. If a challenger highlights the Congressman's vote on Bill 10 to criticize, that's objective. If he calls him "scurrilous"--well, how is the reader to interpret that? Spike-from-NH (talk) 16:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GroundRisk. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of GroundRisk (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:CeceliaXIV/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:CeceliaXIV/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Binksternet (talk) 16:36, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Mexican Drug Cartel Propaganda

Hello CeceliaXIV. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Mexican Drug Cartel Propaganda.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mexican Drug Cartel Propaganda}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 22:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ummmm, FYI...this Wikipedia user has been banned for sockpuppetry of another user that hasn't edited in many months. Guy1890 (talk) 03:09, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]