User talk:CeRcVa13

Welcome!

Hi CeRcVa13! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 15:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Hi. Please add the infoboxes the same way other infoboxes are presented. Linking dates is not needed. Also, adding a citation on the infobox when it is already in the body of the article is not needed. Same goes for the extra space. See what I did here for example [1] --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will try CeRcVa13 (talk) 20:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 15:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate account

Hello CeRcVa! I'm just curious, but is Giorgi Mechurchle an earlier account of yours? In that case it would be good to add a note to that effect on the page User:Giorgi Mechurchle so people can know. Otherwise, happy editing! --Trialpears (talk) 01:51, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, it isn't. CeRcVa13 (talk) 06:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:12, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 14:42, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Your edit to Mushki has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Austronesier (talk) 14:27, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. Look, CeRcVa13, there are a number of problems with your approach to editing. First, you don't use article talk pages, just user talk pages. That's a problem. An article talk page is the designated venue to discuss that respective article's content. It is there where sources and their veracity can be clarified at length and so on. As far as I can see, you've only used an article talk page once, in Talk:Safavid Georgia on 11:23, 28 December 2021 (diff). That isn't good enough when the contested changes lead to edit warring. Proper communication is required. Another major problem is that you seem to be struggling with English, leading to such incomprehensible additions as the one today on 08:59, 9 January 2022 (diff). I'm sorry, but this is the English Wikipedia, so a decent command of the English language is required. Competence is required in that regard. In order to get your editing privileges reinstated, there will need to be a serious commitment to correcting these issues, with an emphasis also on doing your best to observe and otherwise live up to the spirit of WP:ONUS and WP:BURDEN. Thanks and good luck.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 14:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]