User talk:Ccboshoff

Welcome!

Hello, Ccboshoff, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Harvey Boulter, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 18:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harvey Boulter

The article Harvey Boulter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 18:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Harvey Boulter has been reverted.
Your edit here to Harvey Boulter was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL81D2BC1B993D4C66) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Harvey Boulter. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NeemNarduni2. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Harvey Boulter without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Harvey Boulter, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Harvey Boulter, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Harvey Boulter. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 15:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Harvey Boulter. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 15:18, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

Listen here. I am trying to get the page up and running and add references? You are destructive!!!!! You should be banned!!!! Restore my original page and let me finish it!!! Why are you so SUPER KEEN to delete and say reference issues etc?????? Stop messing with the page and restore it to the way it was before you started messing with it!!!!!

Are you not capable of understanding the following: I AM WORKING ON THE PAGE AND BUSY ADDING CONTENT AND REFERENCES. THIS TAKES TIME. YOU DELETING CONTENT WHILE I AM BUSY WITH IT DOES NOT AMOUNT TO FAIR PLAY. ANSWER ME: CAN YOU PLEASE STOP THIS DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOUR?

Ccboshoff (talk) 15:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)CCBOSHOFF[reply]

Answers Required

NeemNarduni2 I require action and answers from you. Restore the page to its original content please. You cannot destroy what I have written while I am in the active process of adding references! This is unacceptable behaviour. Who are you? What is your agenda with destroying the page I am trying to built? Show some respect for the work others are trying to do.

Ccboshoff (talk) 15:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC) CCBOSHOFF[reply]

Restore to original state please

NeemNarduni2 I need you to undo the damage you did on the page. You were very quick to delete content and mess the page, THAT I AM ACTIVELY BUILDING, but very slow to undo the devastation that YOU caused. Restore the page and for crying out loud: GIVE PEOPLE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONTRIBUTE and ADD CONTENT AT A REASONABLE PACE!

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Harvey Boulter. Dcirovic (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Start from Scratch

I must now start from scratch on this page! This time: LET ME FINISH!

As an impartial observer, I'd like to suggest that it would be a good idea to have a look at our article wizard and re-start your editing of the article taking its suggestions into account. I don't know from where you got the original draft (would you care to say?), but it was not a suitable start for a live article. If you use the Draft space to edit the article you will be given more freedom to edit it. I hope this helps, —SMALL JIM 16:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SMALLJIM - Response

Hi SMALLJIM

Thank you for your reply and your advice. I appreciate it and agree. Can we remove the article and move it to the recommended section where I can built in it relative peace. I wrote the original piece - not the version that is currency up as the version was trashed by NeemNarduni2.

Could you possibly help me with moving it or perhaps give some instruction?

Ccboshoff (talk) 16:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)CCBOSHOFF[reply]

The page is now at Draft:Harvey Boulter. —SMALL JIM 16:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SMALLJIM - Thank you very much. If I could buy you a beer right now I would. I am new at Wiki and today was just a huge frustrating exercise and I started feeling attacked from all angles. I really appreciate you helping me as a stranger. I will work on a better piece and make sure I double and triple check all requirements.

Good luck. In case it's relevant, please make sure you understand our guidance on conflict of interest. —SMALL JIM 17:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Looks like you've had a rough start here. Rather insane how editors learn about rules here on Wikipedia only after breaking them don't ya think? Don't let the bureaucratic bloat get you down!!! Cheers! MurderByDeletionism^"bang!" 17:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Won't lie, it's been a rough one. Haven't had this much sweat on my forehead in ages! Thanks a mil bud, I will get stronger and better at this. Really appreciate you taking the time to write the message! Much appreciated!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harvey Boulter (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Please remove all press releases, citations from associated companies/organizations, routine coverage/listings. Take a look at WP:CITEKILL. Also, please do not resubmit until every citation is properly formatted as per WP:CIT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harvey Boulter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ccboshoff, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]