User talk:CatDogLover

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Best Friends Animal Society logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Best Friends Animal Society logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:21, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Best Friends Animal Society logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Best Friends Animal Society logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring over Best Friends Animal Society

Please hold off editing the page and bring the dispute to the discussion page. Thanks. --Dodo bird (talk) 04:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's impossible. The poster is obsessed with putting up material that's unsubstantiated.CatDogLover (talk) 05:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted all references for the material on the discussion page. As you can see, my posts were substantiated. Layla2008 (talk) 05:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page etiquette

Please add your comments at Talk:Best Friends Animal Society in chronological position in relation to the thread you're replying to, or it makes discussion hard to follow. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 03:12, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

COI

You might want to join the discussion at WP:COIN#Best Friends Animal Society. Do you have any proof of the identity mentioned in this edit summary? Gordonofcartoon (talk) 13:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Circumstantial evidence at best, although the fact that she is not disagreeing could be because it's true. Basically I recognize her writing style, and when I checked her contributions I noticed several edits to William Scott and Cathy Scott pages. There are different user names that are used there as well, but I suspect she uses different handles for different purposes. There are also several contributions to Ocean Beach Cal pages which is I believe the area Cathy lives in. I could trace the IP but really haven't wanted to take it that far. I regret having made that post, I let my frustration get the best of me. I should note though that the BF wiki page is a copy of Best Friends material (their 501c paperwork for example), so it was definitely posted by Best Friends itself. But that still leaves copyright issues. Layla2008 (talk) 16:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. My apologies. I'm a bit of a wiki newbie still and inadvertently thought the question was posed to me. Layla2008 (talk) 17:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]