Jump to content

User talk:Cashdeer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia!

[edit]

Hello, Cashdeer, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Emily Davison seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of unsubstantiated speculation at George Floyd

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at George Floyd, you may be blocked from editing.

Here is the edit: [1] Generalrelative (talk) 17:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I said, believed by some I never said it was pure fact Cashdeer (talk) 18:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you recently removed content from History of slavery in Florida without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donald Albury 18:23, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paul Joseph Watson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. There are 8 sources for him being far-right. If you want the change to stick you will have to explain how these 8 sources are either:

November 2022

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:40, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kaifeng Jews

[edit]

Hi Cashdeer. You add a reference for "Pfeffer 2020" to Kaifeng Jews, but no such work is defined in the article. Could you add the required cite to the Sources section or let me know what work this refers to?
Short form references such as {{sfn}} templates are hyperlinks to full cites. You can see this in the article, where if you click "Pfeffer 2008" your browser's focus should shift to the cite showing this means "Taking the Silk Route Back" an article published by Haaretz.
If the cite is missing it creates a "no target error", however this type of error message is off by default. If you haven't already you can turn them on by following the instructions here Category:Harv and Sfn template errors. If you have any questions please just ask. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 15:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I met a kefeing jew from the USA online and his detailed his experiences. He also told me their were about 50 of them living in the US. So I decided to add it in since their was no USA. Cashdeer (talk) 18:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia content needs to be based on previously published sources. Are you saying the figure of 50 kefeing jews in the USA comes from the person you talked to? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 18:52, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. He was a Kafeing Jew living in the USA Cashdeer (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I'll try to find a published source to back up the claim, but if I can't I'll have to revert it. As I said content needs to be backed up by published sources, not just what we know to be true. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 19:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I actually never used a source just information coming from a kaifeng jew living in America. If you can't find a source you are free to revert it I don't mind Cashdeer (talk) 19:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ive had a look online and through Jstor, but I can't find anything relevant. I've reverted for the moment, if you do find a source please do re-introduce the details. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 19:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Los Algodones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lynching of Francisco Arias and José Chamales (July 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:26, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beer riots in Bavaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bavarian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lynching of Francisco Arias and José Chamales (September 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
OhHaiMark (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Cashdeer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OhHaiMark (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wartime sexual violence, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles V, Slavic and Sack of Rome.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Everett Kimble (September 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
None of the sources are reliable (see User-generated content) and this also appears in part to be original research which is not allowed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 16:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Everett Kimble (September 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
What makes Geni.com, wagenweb and stumpranchonline reliable sources?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~Liancetalk 16:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok what do you consider reliable? Cashdeer (talk) 16:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have you read the linked reliable sources page? ~Liancetalk 16:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In addition per previous decliner's comment those sources appear to be user generated content and should not be used. ~Liancetalk 16:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wagenweb often includes references to original documents, archives, or other authoritative sources, enhancing its reliability including historical and genealogical research due to its involvement in the USGenWeb project, which follows strict standards for accuracy and citation. Cashdeer (talk) 16:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also stump ranch online includes stuff in his own words, he literelly makes a letter summarising his life Cashdeer (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What more do you want? Cashdeer (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If these original sources are reliable then you should be directly referencing these using inline citations. On Wikipedia all stated facts should be backed up by a reliable source otherwise they aren't fit for inclusion. Please also see WP:NBIO and ensure your draft demonstrates that the criteria is met through its references prior to resubmitting. Best, ~Liancetalk 16:39, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how to do that can you do it for me? Cashdeer (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, Cashdeer, we cannot do that for you and also keep in mind primary sources cannot be used to establish notability (i.e. census data/goverment documents, letters, etc.). You can used them to for very basic facts but only sparingly. What is needed are reputable secondary sources, such as books published by a reputable publisher, newspapers, peer-reviewed journals, etc. that have written in-depth about Kimble. I checked Google Books but didn't find anything substantial and most genealogy sources are not reliable. S0091 (talk) 17:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And Find A Grave is not a reliable sources either. S0091 (talk) 17:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just checked Newspapers.com but not much about him: a birth announcement, court case - Rebecca sued him and Minevera about divorce and remarriage https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-seattle-post-intelligencer-rebecca-k/155090669/ - and an obituary https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-daily-herald-david-e-kimble/155090066/). Not nearly enough for notability. S0091 (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rollin Heber Neale (September 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources are either not reliable or brief mentions.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 19:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What sites can I use for references? Cashdeer (talk) 20:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the most part, anything you find on the internet is likely unreliable unless its a reputable newspaper or book. If what you have and what I found is all there is (outside of other primary or unreliable sources), I don't see how he can meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I know that's not what you want to hear but that is likely the reality and happens often (especially for women or other underrepresented groups). S0091 (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
do reviewers have to read the book before accepting or declining? Cashdeer (talk) 21:10, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, no one is required to read a book but the book needs to be published by an independent reputable author (such as an historian) and independent reputable publisher. Schreiber is not the original publisher. S0091 (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charlotte Sartre for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlotte Sartre, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Sartre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cashdeer&oldid=1257465174"