User talk:CarsonRammelt

This is CarsonRammelt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: SIXFOOT 5 (Record Producer) (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SIXFOOT 5 (Record Producer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SIXFOOT 5 (Record Producer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:43, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CarsonRammelt! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:43, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:SIXFOOT 5 (Record Producer)

Hello, CarsonRammelt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SIXFOOT 5 (Record Producer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:SIXFOOT 5 (Record Producer)

Hello, CarsonRammelt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SIXFOOT 5".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:49, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SIXFOOT 5 Page Deletion Question

Hi there - I'm wondering if you could give me more information about why 'SIXFOOT 5' Wikipedia page was deleted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CarsonRammelt/sandbox

I'm SIXFOOT 5, I'm a notable figure in the music industry and have worked with a number of artists who have their own Wikipedia pages. My sources included People Magazine and ABC News. CarsonRammelt (talk) 19:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC) CarsonRammelt (talk) 19:36, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted because you requested for it to be deleted, by typing this on the page: {{db-u1}}. Jay 💬 19:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

However, I have restored Draft:SIXFOOT 5 (Record Producer) based on your request at Requests for Undeletion. As you have a WP:Conflict of interest, you will have to disclose the same. See WP:DISCLOSE for details, or you can message me if you require help. Thanks. Jay 💬 19:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carson Rammelt (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not for posting your personal autobiography - clearly WP:SELFPROMOTION.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carson Rammelt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carson Rammelt (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carson Rammelt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:06, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

1. There is an entire article dedicated to SIXFOOT 5 by People Magazine, and incredibly reliable source, naming his clients and his work. This is not an autobiography page, this page is only stating facts. Most of his clients already have Wikipedia pages of their own, does that not show notability?

2. Is it worth posting SIXFOOT 5's website where his credits exist, as a source?

3. Is it worth posting IMDB as a source where it shows his credits for film score?

I don't entirely understand why this is being rejected. You'd think somebody covered by People Magazine is notable enough to have a small Wikipedia page. CarsonRammelt (talk) 18:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello CarsonRammelt! The thread you created at the Teahouse, SIXFOOT 5 Page Deletion Question, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:15, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]