User talk:Carlo pastrani

March 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Giuseppe Sacco, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Giuseppe Sacco. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Giuseppe Sacco with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Carlo pastrani, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Carlo pastrani! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, Carlo pastrani. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Giuseppe Sacco, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Giuseppe Sacco. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dl2000 (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Giuseppe Sacco, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Giuseppe Sacco, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:32, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing and edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JohnCD (talk) 15:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that Wikipedia is not a place for people to write their own profiles, or instruct their employees to do it. As you work for Giuseppe Sacco, you should not be writing about him directly. Please read, carefully, these guidelines:

There is advice for people concerned with articles about themselves or their connections at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help. If there are inaccuracies in the article, what you should do is, explain on the article talk page what changes you suggest, giving links to reliable sources to comply with the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy.

What you should not do is continue to edit-war on the article itself. If you persist, you will be blocked for longer.

If you encounter problems, a message at the WP:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard will bring help from users familiar with these articles.

JohnCD (talk) 15:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Carlo pastrani, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 23:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]