User talk:Carius

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lucian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Contentious topics

Hello. Just wanted to let you know that editors who have made less than 500 edits and have been around for less than 30 days can only make edit requests at article talk pages related to the Arab–Israeli conflict per WP:ARBECR, so I had to remove your !vote at the move discussion for 2024 Israeli ground operation in Lebanon. Thank you for understanding. Nythar (💬-🍀) 06:54, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Jadotville

Hi. While perfectly entitled to question the validity of sources, in this this edit you (likely without meaning to do so) removed text that is supported by multiple reliable refs. For example, where the infobox said "3-5 Indians killed" your changed it to read "3 Indians killed". Despite the fact that multiple sources (including the ones you removed) state that "The Gurkhas suffered five fatalities and twelve wounded" and "The Gurkhas, who had expressed displeasure with the way Force Kane II was being led, suffered five killed in action and twelve wounded in action". Similarly, multiple sources (including this and this and Quinlan's own signed record of his own Company) expressly give that there were 156 members of Company A. And that the "156 members of 'A' Company were [captured]". And yet, despite this, you changed the infobox to state that there were 155. Please be more careful and selective when making updates like that. And try to avoid making broad edits that impact text that, it seems, you didn't actually intend to change. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 12:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I'm sorry, that was an honest mistake from my part, I absolutely did not mean to do that - I'm not the best when it comes to edits involving all them linked things. With that said, what I meant to solely edit has once again been undone by this user "Tan Khaerr", which rests solely on some Congolese book from 1963 (besides which he goes on about how the casualty figures of the battle are only "Irish politics", whatever that is supposed to mean): this seems very dubious and he should provide more better sources. I'm not the best person to carry on editing the article - but you certainly seem to know what you are doing with editing, while also having interest in the subject matter. I would therefore ask of you to watch out for what "Tan Khaerr" is doing in the article. With regards, Carius (talk) 04:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I am also unsure what the editor means by "claimed by the Irish politics" (not least given that those behind several of the sources [incl Whelan and Power] were not involved in Irish politics and Irish politicians largely ignored the events for decades). And consider that the editor's other statement, about "the most suspicious thing is this estimate of 300 casualties caused by only 150 men", to read as a form of subjective opinion (which doesn't seem to account for the fact that the Irish company was supported by multiple armoured cars (firing 15,000 rounds) and the Katangese had no armour). However, if the source provided by the editor should be queried, then those concerns should be raised on the relevant article Talk page. Not, as that editor has also been separately advised, not via an edit-war or only in edit-summaries. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 12:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)