User talk:Caribbeanbio

Welcome!

Hello, Caribbeanbio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sagicor Financial Corporation, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jared Preston (talk) 11:14, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Montserratian politics

Re the Reuben Meade article, would it not be more accurate to say he was Chief Minister from 1996-1999, and from 2009-2011, then Premier from 2011-2014? Cheers, Number 5 7 15:48, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, you're right. Caribbeanbio (talk) 15:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Widefox; talk 00:37, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Wekerle

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael Wekerle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 00:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Warren Cassell, Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warren Cassell, Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Cassell, Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 10:35, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. I'll be happy to help resolve the issue - all unreliable and primary sources that you mentioned have been removed.Caribbeanbio (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Warren Cassell, Jr., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You are required to disclose your COI (e.g. paid editing) and I ask you to refrain from editing this article and restrict yourself to making edit suggestions on the talk page. Especially don't remove maintenace templates, and you should STOP this disruption now, and engage in the COIN linked to above if you wish to defend youself. [1] Widefox; talk 02:00, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a paid editor to this page. I removed three tags after removing unreliable sources. Was only trying to help! Caribbeanbio (talk) 03:14, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Widefox; talk 22:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Wekerle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Wekerle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Wekerle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:37, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sagicor Financial Corporation

The article Sagicor Financial Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I believe this fails wp:CORP. I’m only finding primary sources. Seems to be COI edits over the years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Equine-man (talk) 19:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]