User talk:Cargoking/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cargoking. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, Cargoking, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 17:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, thansk for being polite

Hi CargoK,
thanks for being so polite.
You are absolutely right: I filed a user name change as suggested by you... but then I thought about deleting completely the account as I hadn't any answers up to now.
Best of all.
Human bot (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Mr SRPS

I guess this is the talk page. Thanks for the welcome.Mr SRPS (talk) 21:36, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Egshannon

Mr King...any chance you could explain Kathy Yakals update to my wiki entry? Kathy has worked as an editor for Compute as well as PC world and is still a freelance writer for Microsoft. Bob Shannon Sr —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eqshannon (talk • contribs) 17:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

thanks

thanks Todavia no se (talk) 18:00, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion of County Line High School

I have removed the Proposed Deletion tag that you placed on County Line High School, for reasons which I explained on the article's Talk page.--Unscented (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Today with Pat Kenny

Ah hello. I've just noticed that Today with Pat Kenny is no longer a red link in any of the articles I carefully placed it in (mind you, it has been there long enough) so I thought I'd come along to thank the creator. :) As the person who began articles on his rival shows at RTÉ 2fm and Today FM, it is nice to see someone else working on a new Irish radio programme. Saved me some work, although I'll probably find ways to add to it as well. To think it was nearly deleted were it not for the intervention of Flowerpotman... --can dle •wicke 23:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Absolutely. There are endless possibilities. It depends on your interests, although I often do shows that I don't have a huge amount of interest in. I recently created a template to keep the many You're a Star articles together; since it has finished it appears to have been forgotten about entirely. Lots of red links there and the main series article is a mess. For television programmes there are loads to choose from in the RTÉ archives. Some have articles in various states of disarray (especially those I haven't had the chance to improve yet), some don't have any articles at all. It is best to have some independent sources as well for each programme; these might be found on the sites of newspapers such as The Irish Times, Irish Examiner, Irish Independent, Evening Herald (the last two are usually good for TV). You can get lots of additional information there. And then if you get it as far as 1500 characters within five days (and if it has an interesting fact) it can be nominated for Template:Did you know where it might end up on the Main Page. If you were looking for something massive then there's The Late Late Show, an awful mess as well yet nobody ever seems to work on it very much. It has a habit of getting out of control, with people adding completely random facts without a source. Nobody has ever asked with any great enthusiasm about helping with radio and television before so this is good to see! :) --can dle •wicke 21:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Well I found lots of stuff on the fifth series. I'm not sure if the same amount of information is available for all the series but if it is then it would probably be best to split it like the UK or US equivalents. --can dle •wicke 21:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll see what I can do. I have done series five though, which is a good article to base it all on. Here are some sources for the sixth series. [1] [2] [3] [4] And two vague enough mentions for what I think is series three [5] [6] The official site seems to have a lot of information on series six. One for each charity series. [7] [8] --can dle •wicke 23:08, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:David Brophy.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:David Brophy.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 13:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:RTÉ Concert Orchestra Image.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:RTÉ Concert Orchestra Image.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 13:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:RTÉ National Symphony Orchestra Image.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:RTÉ National Symphony Orchestra Image.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 13:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:RTÉ Philharmonic Choir Image.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:RTÉ Philharmonic Choir Image.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 13:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:RTÉ Cór na nÓg Image.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:RTÉ Cór na nÓg Image.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 13:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:RTÉ Vanbrugh Quartet Image.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:RTÉ Vanbrugh Quartet Image.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 13:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Alan Buribayev.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Alan Buribayev.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 13:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Images uploaded of RTÉ Performing Groups

Hi there.

Thank you for informing me that I have to provide proof that I have been given permission to uploaded the RTÉ Performing Groups. I was in contact with a PR Executive in RTÉ Performing Groups via email. I have forwarded those emails on to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, but have heard nothing back. What do you suggest I do?

Thanks

CargoK ^user ^talk 09:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi CargoKing, it may take some time as the mail list is manned by volunteers. If you add {{OTRS pending}} to the text bit of the images you've uploaded that will tell people that the email has been sent. Peripitus (Talk) 12:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: We meet again

I don't know... (whispers) STALKER!!! I had to watch the news after discovering that bombshell... but where did you find me exactly? --can dle •wicke 21:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh yes, I hadn't forgotten you that quickly. :-) I was just wondering where or how frequently you had bumped into me today. --can dle •wicke 21:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh right... and you've nominated some ITNs, I see now... mighty hot these days... :) --can dle •wicke 22:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Indeed! :D (Raises glass, realises it is empty, scuttles away quietly...) --can dle •wicke 22:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

(Pops head round door) Oh, just a bit more! (Runs off) --can dle •wicke 22:16, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh excellent - can you convince them to put more information from their older radio and television programme archives online? :) Tubridy fan? The Full Irish needs expanding and actual sources before someone tries to delete it. Since you do Radio 1 shows and have created this, you could do the Radio 1 equivalent of Template:2fm... I meant to do that last year as well but got distracted by the fact that there's so much to do... lots of missing articles to be found on Template:Today FM too, specifically some of the more long-term presenters, who ought to have sources online somewhere, and Mario Rosenstock needs more sources as well... I see some of the articles on the radio templates don't have the templates on their pages as well... have you nominated any new creations or significant expansions for DYK? --can dle •wicke 22:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

ITN for Cuban relations with the Organization of American States

On 3 June, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Cuban relations with the Organization of American States, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 23:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

The Tubridy Show

I expanded it, added sources and nominated it to be featured on the Main Page in future... --can dle •wicke 03:04, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah no, I didn't mean you had to do it... I thought you were looking for something to do... looks well though. :) --can dle •wicke 19:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For your hard work, continued and inspiring enthusiasm, efforts at "being a bot for a few hours" and creation of the RTER1 template. can dle •wicke 19:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) --can dle •wicke 19:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Chat? Documentary? Nature? Perhaps you should e-mail him... :) he does love his blue tits though... --can dle •wicke 20:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

That's fine, no rush, you've already done lots... :) --can dle •wicke 20:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

The Marian Finucane Show

I expanded it, added sources and nominated it to be featured on the Main Page as well... --can dle •wicke 02:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

ITN for Barack Obama speech at Cairo University, 2009

On 5 June, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Barack Obama speech at Cairo University, 2009, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 03:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Mooney and also The Week in Politics

The President's Tits The Senators' golf game --can dle •wicke 01:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

George Lee

Hi, I'm afraid I had to move George Lee, yet again, because User:Damac didn't check the other George Lee's so we would have ended up with George Lee (English politician) and George Lee (politician), which would have been confusing! Anyway, this should be the last move for George. Snappy (talk) 16:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry. It just means I have to change the templates! CargoK ^user ^talk 17:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Rachael English

She was a difficult one... --can dle •wicke 00:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK for The Week in Politics

On June 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Week in Politics, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royal broil 03:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

These things

No, it's OK, gives me something else to do, you get more of the above, they get the chance to be on the Main Page, everybody wins. I'll do them later. :) --can dle •wicke 17:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

The woman who would be president BBC Zimbabwe spy --can dle •wicke 01:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

ITN for 2009 Hermosillo daycare center fire

On 8 June, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2009 Hermosillo daycare center fire, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 13:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bobby Kerr (businessman)

A tag has been placed on Bobby Kerr (businessman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bonewah (talk) 17:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)