User talk:Carchias

Welcome!

Hi Carchias! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! DanCherek (talk) 05:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your welcome message DanCherek! I am just getting the hang of things as a contributor and have loved wikipedia for many many years. So glad to be here! Carchias (talk) 11:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying from public domain sources requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Consumer Compliance. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 05:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote a description if "consumer compliance" based on public domain content but I did not copy the public domain content. My description of "consumer compliance" is based on several public domain sources. I will add footnotes for all of them. Thank you. Carchias (talk) 11:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Consumer Compliance (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mako001 was:

There are several reasons why I am declining this:

First, it is quite difficult to understand what it is trying to say, and there seem to be some contradictions in it.

Second, it isn't really a proper article, as it consists of a definition, and then a list of laws and regulations which apparently relate to this topic in some way.

Third, the sources do not show that this is a notable topic.

Lastly, it seems likely that this wouldn't really warrant enough content for a standalone article anyway and would be best off merged into another article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Consumer Compliance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Consumer Compliance, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 10:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Carchias! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 10:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Carchias, I am sorry that a review of your draft was done earlier today by a novice editor JabrinUttu, which isn't normal and will be investigated. I don't think your draft should have been declined, especially for the reason given. Will see if someone experienced can take a look at it and give you any pertinent advice. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Curb Safe Charmer, Thank you for your message. I did not receive a notification from JabrinUttu that my Consumer Compliance article had been reviewed since I resubmitted it last month. Is Mako001 also a novice reviewer? She declined my article very quickly after I submitted it in April. The article is an important one right now because most people do not know what consumer compliance is or what comprises consumer compliance requirements in the US. Carchias (talk) 11:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Consumer Compliance (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No substantial change since last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Consumer Compliance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:24, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting draft

Hello. While monitoring recent changes, I noticed you blanked your draft. If you would like to delete it, just add {{db-g7}} to the top of the article and an administrator will delete it for you. Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 11:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for your message. I am not deleting the draft, I am revising it. I added the revised text and deleted the old version. Do you recommend a different approach? Carchias (talk) 11:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

I'm pleased to see that you are editing again. I'm sorry that it took so long, partly through my fault, but I'm glad that eventually I managed to help you. JBW (talk) 19:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Consumer Compliance (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2016-11-14/pdf/2016-27226.pdf, https://www.consumercomplianceoutlook.org/2022/third-issue/elements-of-a-strong-compliance-management-system-under-the-ffiec-compliance-rating-system/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Consumer Compliance may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:57, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article I wrote uses multiple sources, most of which belong to the public because they are laws and regulations. I am very surprised you deleted the article. Did I not use the correct format for referencing copyrighted and public domain works? Would it be possible for you to share that with me or direct me to a resource on Wikipedia that provides instruction for writing about topics that require reference to laws, regs and other information that belongs to the public? Carchias (talk) 12:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: "There are no copyright restrictions on the Federal Register; as a work of the U.S. government, it is in the public domain." Source: Federal Register Carchias (talk) 13:32, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure you are right about that, and so Dan arndt, who nominated the page for deletion, and Jimfbleak, who carried out the deletion, were mistaken in taking that as a copyright infringement. However, the other source listed, at https://www.consumercomplianceoutlook.org/, ppears to be a different matter, because that page has a copyright notice which says "Copyright 2023 Federal Reserve System. This material is the intellectual property of the Federal Reserve System and cannot be copied without permission". (I am surprised that Federal Reserve System material is copyright protected, but that's what it says. Anyway, you no doubt know far more about the Federal Reserve System than I do.) You could edit the draft to remove any possible copyright problem, but there would still be a chance that the draft would be declined again, so you may be better advised not to put more time into it. I say that with great reluctance, because you have evidently put a significant amount of work into it, and seeing it thrown away must be very frustrating, but putting yet more work into it and still seeing it declined would probably be even more frustrating. I see that, although you have had this account for over 13 years, you have only relatively recently been editing, and have not yet done a lot of editing, so in that sense you are a fairly new editor. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. JBW (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. I will leave it deleted. Hopefully someone with more experience will write a Wikipedia entry for Consumer Compliance. Thank you for your message. I appreciate it. Carchias (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]