User talk:Carbon0902

Welcome!

Hello, Carbon0902! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 01:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Carbon0902, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Carbon0902! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Carbon0901, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Mr. Guye (talk) 01:17, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't adopt you

I'm sorry, but I don't feel like I'm qualified to adopt any users yet.

If you still want to be adopted, ask DGG, Tokyogirl79, Materialscientist, OccultZone, or Arthur Rubin. ---Mr. Guye (talk) 23:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I do not do this either. DGG ( talk ) 04:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh boy...Ok thank you anyway. I will seek "adoption" via the list you've taken the time out to generate for me. I do appreciate all of your help (editors & administrators) thus far for taking the time out of your busy schedules with helping me out in editing this article -- I really do appreciate this. I also know how time consuming it may be, being involved in correcting articles in general, and so respect everyone's professional input here. In addition, I too have also been busy at work with research (as we speak, while under the given time constraints) via trying to do my very best in making the appropriate necessary revisions, and correct updates needed based on the suggestion given to me. Thank you for having faith in me, and for giving me a chance (opportunity) here to rectify the problems here at hand, and Thanks again for all your help. --Carbon0902 (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doc Mentillo

It is nice to see that you are working on Doc Mentillo. Unfortunately, all sources you have given are completely useless. A reference must point to something a web address, book, magazine and the likes in such a way that you can check the information given in the article with the given source. In all cases of your references, that is impossible. So please improve the references to the most exact descrdoiove been very niceg ption and destination (like full URL and page numbers). The Banner talk 16:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

No problem sir. Thanks again for your help. Glad you noticed I'm still working painstakingly on this article. Incidentally, This project has proven to be more challenging than I ever anticipated. In fact, so much so that unfortunately I've become reunited again with my friend, Mr. "Jack Daniels." And now my bloody well has run dry! lol --Carbon0902 (talk) 17:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Take another bottle, as nomn of your sources is conform qualified as independent and reliable sources. Please read Reliable Sources what we really want as sources. The Banner talk 19:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Again

Thank you again for all your help, and for the heads up. I really do appreciate you trying to help me again. You've been very resourceful and informative. However, I'm still working on this section and have found some other articles in New York Times, and many many other sources (in other countries) for which I planned on citing, but don't have the time to work on this under the time constraints given, especially when I know this will eventually get deleted regardless of what sources or revisions I attempt. This is primarily the reason why I honestly never meant for this article to go live in the first place. This unfortunately was no other persons fault but my own. I take full responsibility for "messing up this persons article." And if I was ever going to consume an additional bottle, it would indeed be because of this reason. I don't enjoy screwing up somebodys article, especially when they never wanted the article to go live in the first place. For this I am ashamed. Additionally, so far I've found my experience thus far on wikipedia (in every way) to be far to time consuming, and no less than daunting and horrific. I only was trying to contribute, but perhaps Wikipedia is not for me. Thanks again everyone for your, help and God bless.

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Doc Mentillo. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 06:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]