User talk:Capitalister

Welcome!

Hello, Capitalister, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Ryan Delaney ^talk 19:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware of and adhere to Wikipedia:Three revert rule. Thank you. Gamaliel 20:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trolling

I think you falsely called a user's comments trolling in this edit, and erased his statement. I don't see anything that would indicate that this fellow's comments are only intended to irritate; they look like just a line of argument. I detest trolling, but this isn't it. 03:27, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

* Important - Your input requested ASAP *

Please see this Wikipedia:Deletion review#Rationales_to_impeach_George_W._Bush.

Merecat 00:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Tawker 01:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tawker, what is the test1 for? BlueGoose 01:43, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

For improperly placing a block notice on a user who is not blocked, reverting AFD closes and other disruptive behavior in general violation of Don't be a dick, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for 24 hours. Please take this time to re-examine your activities on the encyclopedia. FCYTravis 01:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renom of Rationales provided by advocates of the impeachment of George W. Bush

Hello Capitalister. I speedy kept this article because it was relisted too soon after the last nomination. At this point I believe that discussion on the article's talk page, or revision of the article itself, would be much more productive. --F a ng Aili ^說嗎? 01:51, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

URGENT! Your vote needed

Come vote here please to decide this important matter! i trust that you'll make the right decision--Rictonilpog 17:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Union of Concerned Socialists

Good luck on your edits--FairNBalanced 01:21, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a new section--FairNBalanced 08:37, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]