User talk:CapChecker123

Welcome!

Hi CapChecker123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 02:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Afghan–Sikh Wars—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Battle of Gujrat that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Comments like this one are not considered civil. utcursch | talk 05:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. CapChecker123 (talk) 17:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reported.

FYI, logging out to edit war is still edit warring. See here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Idk what you’re talking about CapChecker123 (talk) 17:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring and personal attacks

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Edit warring and personal attacks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 19:28, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. CapChecker123 (talk) 17:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]