User talk:Caonashi

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Caonashi (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (DKICP.)

I live in Hilo, HI and attend DKICP.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Caonashi, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:40, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This is written like an essay or magazine article, not like an encyclopedia article. The back story about Inouye does not belong here - he has a page. The story of the selection of the dean is not encyclopedic. Just give the name of the first dean. Accreditation is not a story, just say that it is accredited. Do not use hyperbole like "The college's logo is laden with meaningful symbolism." Just say what the symbols are. Do not cite laws, etc. Your sources must be what others have written about the school -- do not do original research. In the end, this should be a very short article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 20:28, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justlettersandnumbers was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article accepted

Hi. There was a bit of a mix-up at Articles for Creation and your article got rejected before I could accept it. But I've worked it out with the other reviewer, and accepted your article. You will find it now under Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy. Note that because you are closely connected to the college, you should declare that on the talk page (I'll leave below all of the instructions about that), and should avoid further editing of the article except to fix obvious details, like dates or names. LaMona (talk) 17:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

(As promised, rules to follow)

Hello, Caonashi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. LaMona (talk) 17:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Caonashi would you please acknowledge receipt of the above? Also, please read WP:BOOSTER. You can reply here, as I am watching this page. Jytdog (talk) 15:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged Caonashi (talk) 23:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Caoniashi. Have you read the COI guideline? If so, why are you continuing to edit the article directly? Do tell. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 01:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was editing the portions of which I thought you were requesting that I improve/edit.Caonashi (talk) 02:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

based on your note at the article talk page, you understand that you should not directly edit. that is great. Jytdog (talk) 03:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

btw, if you want to understand why we have this guideline, i would be happy to explain. if you are getting a degree at the school and go into the field, you should go in with a keen awareness of what COI is in the real world, as well as in WP. The same notions apply. Jytdog (talk) 03:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mahalo for your help, Jytdog. I read quite a bit into COI and also the discussion on your page about initiating the investigation of your own COI. I found that part interesting and although I'd like to be able to dispel whatever concerns there may exist with my COI, I don't think the idea of everyone self-initiating investigations is practical. Caonashi (talk) 05:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]