User talk:Cantras

thanks and sorry : I don't quite yet understand, but just warned the authorities, I think — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dejima (talk • contribs)

From Povorot

Sweet Christ! You guys are prompt! I assume, then, that my page's life span is rapidly shortening.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Povorot (talk • contribs)

Cantras Vote for AboutUs.org! : )

When you think of the torment of being ignored by DMOZ and reading their converstation pages where webmasters meekly try to get an editor to read a year old request.. in fear of not making the list.. you will know why I am the first to write on this truly open directory. Plus I liked the controversy listed on some of the google search results which appeared to be a DMOZ editor potentially being phased out by the wiki style site that has just made it's rank 911 today (2100 avg. this past month). Read up on DMOZ and see this is simplay a new open version.

This is a fantastic example of something being incomprehensible. Please strive to not leave comments like this one. That said, I do not support aboutus.org, and the article's neutrality is still extremely dodgy.Cantras 22:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shanley High School

so hey...so answer my question do u go 2 shanley??? or did u??? i go there...i AM a current student and i represent the voice of all of those who go there...which is 320 people of that # 95% feel the same as i do....and about the starvation thing...i feel bad for people who are starving and i organized a food donation at my school that was succesful...so yeah please stop changing my things i put on my school page...i wont delete urs....and delete this after u read it...thanks...

The above comment was left on my user page (by User:Shsrockers), when I deleted "zomg theire rools r meen" edits to Shanley High School. I just took off the unencyclopedic POV wanking again. I will also be in charge of what I do and do not delete off my user/talk pages, thanks. Cantras 23:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Schindler's List

It depends on if your information was something that was derived on your own, or if that was Spielberg's actual intent to have the title to be ambiguous like that. If it's the former, it violates Wikipedia's original research policy. If it's the latter, then the information would need to be verified by citing a reliable source. Also, sentences in parentheses are generally frowned upon if they can't be worked into the rest of the content without the parentheses. --Erik (^talk/_contrib) @ 19:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red Organ Serpent Sound

Excuse me, but I'd like to know why you have added the speedy deletion tag to my work. The band is rising in popularity, and if you'd care to search google, you would find this out. Also I am a native of Derry and Ireland and I know how popular this band is!. Ryannus 17:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed nom

Don't forget to use the "preloaded debate" link to create AfD pages, here for example. yandman 09:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IGBP

Hi, I have lifted the speedy tag from IGBP and I want to explain why. This article has been hanging around all night with a speedy tag on it but no-one has been prepared to touch it. Consequently, I have added some context and catted/stubbed it. TerriersFan 04:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TAPSU

I think that the article is horribly written, and it probably deserves a speedy delete in this shape. However, the article could be expanded (not just wikified) into a good article. Thank you for showing this to me. Diez2 01:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kulthau

I just rescued it from speedy deletion. It needs some more, and I have made some suggestions on the article talk page. I have considerable experience in redoing academic bios to fit the WP peculiarities, and I'll keep an eye on it. DGG 05:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fairey Long-range Monoplane

Kindly be so good as to check when articles were created before tagging them for deletion. You have just left me with an edit conflict to resolve through your impatience.SDasey 19:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: the edit conflict has resulting in my entry being lost. I have therefore lost FOUR HOURS work! You will therefore pardon me if my opinion of you is extremely low.SDasey 19:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warcraft G12

Thanks for the note; I think the ref to the violated source was still missing (or I didn't scroll down enough). Clearly you are right about G12. Thanks again! Baccyak4H (Yak!) 21:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prod of Rahat John

Hey, just letting you know I changed the prod on Rahat John to a speedy delete under WP:CSD, I believe it is covered by criteria A7, however if the speedy is denied, I'll revert back to the prod. (Just letting you know why) --NigelJ ^talk 00:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opentopia

Good suggestions, I was hoping for specifically who you thought might be in charge or how to contact them. My 'hang on' was hopefully to leave it there long enough until someone 'in charge' does notice it, but it looks like it is gone now. Maybe the speedy deletion team forwarded to whomever is appropriate. Jethero^Talk 15:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Cantras! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 23:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Cantras! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cantras. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cantras. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]