User talk:Canon8

Welcome!

Hello, Canon8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 15:12, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Canon8, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Canon8! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. FDW777 (talk) 10:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Canon8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have I been blocked? I haven't caused any abuse or vandalism. I have done constructive editing so far. Please look at my contributions for verification. Kindly request you to unblock my account.

Decline reason:

You were blocked for violating WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 15:55, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Canon8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have I been blocked? I haven't caused any abuse or vandalism. I have done constructive editing so far. Please look at my contributions for verification. Kindly request you to unblock my account. Also I got a message that it has been blocked for WP:SOCK. After going through WP:SOCK, this reasoning does not apply to me because this is my only account. You (admins) can verify it. There is absolutely no other account I have.

Decline reason:

The checkuser tool indicates that you are a sock. PhilKnight (talk) 18:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"You (admins) can verify it." Yes, we can, and we did. Funny, you sound just like you did last time. Drmies (talk) 17:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But you haven't verified anything. And what do you mean that I sound just like last time? I think that is very inappropriate statement to make. My account is a victim of collateral damage. Any help would be appreciated. Canon8 (talk) 18:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Canon8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is a victim of collateral damage and its quite obvious as the reason for blocking is stated to be sock. I believe the checkuser or checkuser tool is mistaken. Can someone please take time to look much further into this matter?

Decline reason:

I took the time to look. I verified the findings. I see no mistake. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Canon8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is fourth request. My account is a victim of collateral damage and its quite obvious as the reason for blocking is stated to be sock. I believe the checkuser or checkuser tool is mistaken. Can someone please take time to look much further into this matter? The last decline statement was that I verified the findings. I see no mistake. But this doesn't help. What are these findings? Can someone show it so that I can know if its correct or not?

Decline reason:

"Victims, aren't we all." You're a sock puppet. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Canon8 (talk) 20:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you email the Arbitration Committee at Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee. PhilKnight (talk) 20:45, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]