User talk:Canarian

Welcome!

Hello, Canarian! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Hafspajen (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Brazilian Dogo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to FCI and Dogo

List of dog breeds recognized by the American Kennel Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chinook

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Checked and corrected. --Canarian (talk) 17:48, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of dog breeds recognized by the FCI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pomeranian

Segugio Italiano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Istrian Hound

Terceira Mastiff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dogo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Checked and corrected. --Canarian (talk) 17:48, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of dog breeds recognized by the FCI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Maltese, Bolognese and Continental Toy Spaniel

Working Group (dogs) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chinook

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Checked and corrected. --Canarian (talk) 18:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tamaskan Dog

Hi. Just wanted you to know I removed a fair bit of what you added to the Tamaskan Dog article today. I did this for the following reasons;

If you are going to say "dog people in Finland do not regard it as a Finnish breed" you need a cite that says exactly this. Who has asked the Finnish this?
Collating references to discuss what doesn't exist, as you do with; "However, there is not even an official breed club in Finland", is a form of original synthesis unless, again, there is a reliable source that makes this same point.
Same goes for breeders, and there isn't a call for listing individual breeders.
"It is also believed that the first larger kennel club that will recognize the breed will be the American Kennel Club, so the breed can at least nowadays be considered being mostly British-American." Who believes this? Who considers it mostly British/American? Wikipedia shouldn't contain unattributed speculation and opinions.

If you can address these concerns then please red-add to the article. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 19:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm originally from Finland and I've read several discussions about the Tamaskan Dog in Finnish dog forums, for instance the Siberian Husky Association's forum. Dog people here are generally very confused about the breed and especially its "Finnish" origin (especially as being created by British breeders and with no Finnish breeders currently existing). However, I am a little unsure if I can refer to forum boards as a reference? If not, I won't add that one and I'll see if I find the same information from more official sources. The problem is that the "debate" about the breed status in Finland is based more on general opinion of dog people in Finland and the fact that the only Tamaskan kennel that even ever existed in Finland was Blustag, but I try to search later today if I can find something from books/internet. I still think the fact that activities with the breed and its breeding (such as national breed organizations and their listed breeders) are at the moment much more remarkable in North America and other parts of Europe than in Finland could be noted into relevance to the breeds origin. I think otherwise the article gives an image that the breed would also be bred in Finland due the note of its origin (while, however, at the moment there is no activity with the Tamaskan or its breeding). --Canarian (talk) 11:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

State dogs etc

Hi Canarian, I noticed that you've been adding a number of state dogs as a note within the info box on a number of articles - it's great to see work being done on dog breed articles but I am a little concerned as to what you are using as a reference for these? I see you raised a query at the Chihuahua talk page and stated you had used another Wikipedia article as the source - unfortunately, Wikipedia cannot be used as a source and you would need to find an independent reference for any you may have included purely based on Wikipedia articles. Of course if a ref is given in the WP article and you are able to verify it, then you can use the original ref. If you have any questions (especially as I'm not sure I'm being very clear here), please feel free to drop a note on my talk page. Thanks for the work you've been doing. SagaciousPhil - Chat 20:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to search later today other sources otside the Wikipedia list. I think with the case of the Novascotia Duck Toller I already have a book stating that and with the Esquimaux there is a note about the territorial dog in the website of Nunavut, but I'll check both a little later. --Canarian (talk) 11:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murcian Ratter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Majorca Ratter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baleares. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Warren Hound

Hello Canarian,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Warren Hound for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Portuguese Podengo.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 17:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Portuguese Podengo is just one breed representing this type of dog. Warren Hound includes many other breeds as well, as listed in the article. Just like article "Podenco" in other Wikipedia languages refers to a different topic than Portuguese Podengo (for instance, here's the Spanish article about the subject and here the Swedish one). --Canarian (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:49, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Canarian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Canarian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changing Categories on dog articles

Why are you replacing en masse [[Category:Dog breeds]] with [[Category:FCI breeds]]? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:03, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Dog breeds" is an upper category of several sub-categories in most of these articles. "Hunting dog" is an upper category of "scent hounds" and "hounds". When it comes to the "FCI Breeds", it's also a sub-category of the main category "Dog breeds". If I have understood correctly, upper/main categories are not needed, if one or several of their sub-categories are already used in the article. --Canarian (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You could accomplish just as much by adding [[Category:FCI breeds]] and leaving [[Category:Dog breeds]]. Where is the harm in overlap, assuming it exists? </nowiki> 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok for now on I'll leave the category dog breeds as well, as far as there is no clear guideline applying to overlapping categories. --Canarian (talk) 17:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with your addition. Only your subtraction. You've already done a lot of damage. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When you put them in, add it in alphabetical order. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:39, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:7&6=thirteen That guidance does not agree with WP:SUBCAT. Please explain. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:52, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:FCI 6

Template:FCI 6 has been nominated for merging with Template:Hounds. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 10:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:FCI 7

Template:FCI 7 has been nominated for merging with Template:Gundogs. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 10:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple template deletion nominations

Hello, I have changed my above nominations to deletion nominations and nominated the remaining Templates in the series. I feel they duplicate longstanding navboxes unnecessarily. Kind regards, Cavalryman V31 (talk) 10:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Canarian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cane Pecoraio Varbutu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cane Pecoraio Varbutu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

~~The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cane Pecoraio Varbutu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion~~. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit _(blether) 15:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cane Pecoraio Varbutu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cane Pecoraio Varbutu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cane Pecoraio Varbutu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit _(blether) 15:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the double notification - I'm afraid that something went wrong with Twinkle when I submitted the first nomination, it created a bit of a mess so thought the best thing would be to resubmit and ask for the original one to be CSDed. If you want to comment on the nomination, please do so at the second nomination.

Potsdam Greyhound page

With respect, the eleven known dogs, either owned or bred by Frederick, all 'Italian greyhounds' or 'windspiel' are buried next to him at Sans Souci Brandenburg. In German and other European canine literature these dogs are known as Italian greyhounds, the progenitors of the modern 'breed' of the same name. It would be more convincing if this page could offer some German source on this so-called 'Potsdam greyhound' other than the single reference to the English writer Morris - otherwise this article lacks any credibility.--Richard Hawkins (talk) 17:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Please provide some primary (German and or Italian) source on this dog type (not a breed), it can only be the Windspiel, in which case this page is totally bogus. Desmond Morris is not an authority on Continental dog types.--Richard Hawkins (talk) 19:22, 30 May 2019 (UTC)--Richard Hawkins (talk) 12:33, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Russian Salon Dog for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russian Salon Dog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian Salon Dog until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cavalryman (talk) 23:14, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of dog breeds recognized by the FCI for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of dog breeds recognized by the FCI is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of dog breeds recognized by the FCI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cavalryman (talk) 01:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Seskar Seal Dog for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seskar Seal Dog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seskar Seal Dog until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 19:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Majorca Ratter

The article Majorca Ratter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced and always has been, no sources can be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. It has been a while, I hope you are well. Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 10:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ratonero Murciano de Huerta

The article Ratonero Murciano de Huerta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only source cited not RS, cannot locate any mention of these dogs anywhere else.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 11:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ratonero Murciano de Huerta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ratonero Murciano de Huerta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratonero Murciano de Huerta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 05:45, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guatemalan Dogo AfD nomination

I should've asked you before nominating it sorry but it just completely slipped my mind until after I'd created the discussion.

Discussion can be found here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guatemalan Dogo, if you can establish notability I'll ask for a closure. Traumnovelle (talk) 02:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guatemalan Dogo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guatemalan Dogo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guatemalan Dogo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dog breeds originating in Guatemala

A tag has been placed on Category:Dog breeds originating in Guatemala indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]