User talk:CanadianBoy7

August 2012

Hello, I'm Arsenalkid700. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks can easily be misinterpreted. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 05:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lukas Podolski

Ok mate then change it when its confirmed.

Picture and stuff

When adding a topic on my talk page please click New Section which should be located at the top right of the page.
All you need to know is right here... Wikipedia:Image use policy, Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, Wikipedia:Non-free content. But in short you cant add any picture. You need to have permission and proof of that permission to upload on wikipedia. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CanadianBoy7, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi CanadianBoy7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message automatically delivered by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 00:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CanadianBoy7: Thanks guys!

Jordi Alba

Hi there CB, AL from Portugal here,

this player is not a defensive midfielder, just click the position to see where it leads you, it leads you to a guy that plays in the middle, whose best attributes are tackling and marking.

Alba plays in the wing, the left one, so MIDFIELDER is the correct approach OK? Happy week and editing - --AL (talk) 13:31, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A mistake? Happens to the best man, don't worry and keep it up! --AL (talk) 17:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Change

Iniesta

Please stop changing the position of Andrés Iniesta. Only midfield is already suffice.- --marcospace (talk) 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Again, stop reversing. Only midfield enough. If you continue to be inconvenient, I will report you.- --marcospace (talk) 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrés Iniesta. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again

Hey mate, just want to say about what is happening above, I would stop. Its obvious what the view is and unless you want to be blocked then stop. I mean I can help you get unblocked because you have been on wikipedia for a short time but if you continue this then I cant do that much. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 21:33, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Balotelli

Hi! Please note that Balotelli transfer has not yet been officially announced by the clubs. This is because he is yet to undergo the medical examinations and sign the contract. So, please, wait until either AC Milan or Man City issue an official press release before adding him to the Milan squad. Luxic (talk) 14:50, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neymar

Even if you're frustrated, please don't insert comments like you did at Neymar. Acroterion (talk) 16:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neymar, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 16:39, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This warning is for your commentary, not for the content. Stop with the abusive language. Acroterion (talk) 16:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Neymar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mosmof (talk) 16:47, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CanadianBoy7 : how logic is your revert ? Tonight, Neymar will be playing for Santos (vs Flamengo) and you re trying to put in "current team" FC Barcelona right now ? "Current" means : where he is now ! Now he is not in Barcelona. Loreleil (talk) 16:58, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you're engaged in an edit war and you are already past the three-revert limit. More importantly, please stop changing Neymar's team to Barcelona. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and we don't include future events, even when we're sure they're going to happen. What's the rush? Mosmof (talk) 17:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Neymar. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mosmof (talk) 17:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Neymar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Again, stop it, you will be blocked. Narom (talk) 17:29, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to David Villa because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 18:25, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 18:49, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Your recent edit to the page Thiago Alcântara appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Thiago Alcântara. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Pepe Reina. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transfers

If the transfers aren't complete, which they aren't, then Wikipedia in the meantime shouldn't say there are. It's a simple case of waiting for confirmation from reliable sources, there's no rush to go about making premature updates. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gareth Bale, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have already been advised not to add this again without a source and chose to ignore. Given your previous record this is a final warning to desist Tmol42 (talk) 20:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Luis Suárez. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. He is yet to have a medical or sign the contract. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:50, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but Barcelona say Suárez has not yet had his medical or signed his contract yet. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Men in Black 3

First of all, thanks for your contributions. I'm sorry my reasons for reverting weren't clear. Please take a look at WP:OVERLINKING, which states - "Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers, links may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead." While the guideline allows for repeated links that are "helpful", generally this is interpreted such that subsequent mentions of a subject in an infobox are not linked, and since Will Smith's name is already linked in the "Written by" field, linking it later in the "starring" field might be considered unnecessary. Personally, I don't feel all that strongly about it in this particular case, since it's not egregious, but it's a good guideline to follow in general.

You might like to know, by the way, that your code comment ("Before you decide to unlink Will Smith please send me a message on why you are doing this? Thank you") would soon lose its intended meaning, as there is no indication in the markup itself who left the message (that would require a search of the edit history). Furthermore, code comments such as that should really be reserved for general comments or consensus decisions, not personal requests. If you have a question about an edit made to an article, you should either ask the editor involved directly (me, in this case) or post on the article's talk page. Thanks!

--Fru1tbat (talk) 15:44, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed your edit on the same subject here. I'd prefer that you come to me next time directly rather than posting about me on an uninvolved user's talk page. Thanks! --Fru1tbat (talk) 16:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CanadianBoy7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]