User talk:Canada2026

This is Canada2026's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Finn Linder, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Canada2026/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Canada2026! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple copies

Please don't create multiple drafts on the same subject. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. That was a mistake. Canada2026 (talk) 16:38, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Finn Linder (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Finn Linder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 22:52, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Finn Linder (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bogger was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too soon - Bogger (talk) 19:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Finn Linder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bogger (talk) 19:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Canada2026/sandbox

Hello, Canada2026. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Canada2026/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Canada2026/sandbox

Hello, Canada2026. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Finn Linder (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I don't think he passes notability guidelines yet - lots of sources but I don't know what specifically passes WP:GNG as significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Finn Linder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 17:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HI. Thank you for the feedback. I am struggling to understand the difference in some wiki pages vs this one being created. Can you give more specific feedback as to how these are different and why they would be published and not this one?

Mihail Gherasimencov

Owen Antoniuk

Gloire Amanda Canada2026 (talk) 18:05, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, came across this when I noticed the draft for Finn Linder while I went through Whitecaps 2 players. For Wiki pages they typically want multiple non-primary sources (ie. not from the team/league website) that talk about the player in a bit of detail beyond just a one-sentence sentence mention. Also players get a bit of a boost when they've played at a national top tier league (ie. Amanda and Antoniuk). Amanda has gotten a fair bit of third party coverage from winning the top college player and playing in Austria. Antoniuk got basically just enough from his move to the CPL. The Gherasimenicov one is more like this one in that it is basically majority primary sources. It will likely get moved back to draft again (it has before already) as it has the "notability" tag at the top of the page already. I tried to spruce that one up myself after I saw it in mainspace, but I didn't find any third party sources (I'm just not a user who tends to move things in and out of mainspace) and won't be surprised if its back in draft space soon. The Linder article is well written but most of the in-depth sources come from primary sources (Whitecaps) while the third party references typically just mention him in a single line in a grouping with others, so that's probably the reason it was viewed as not passing the GNG. The only one that kind of discusses him in a bit of detail in the AFTN Whitecaps 2 are back article. It probably just needs another third article that probably discusses him as the main topic (ie. even having his name in the title of the third party article). RedPatch (talk) 13:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I assumed the World Cup would be enough but I will continue to look for articles that more directly speak about the player. 2604:3D09:1388:A000:D4F3:6B20:6A1D:1ECB (talk) 15:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Finn Linder

Hello, Canada2026. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Finn Linder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]