User talk:Camilo Sanchez/archive 2

WP:ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[1]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Alex79818 (talk) 23:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Departamentos colombia.svg

Would you happen to have available a blank (i.e. uncolored) version of that svg map? --Phil5329 (talk) 03:21, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Citytv.com.co

A tag has been placed on Citytv.com.co requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Citytv.com.co

I have nominated Citytv.com.co, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citytv.com.co. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:03, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:FACAESCUD.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FACAESCUD.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Falkland Islands Article in Arbitration

Having briefly reviewed the article's discussion history, I've identified you as a potentially aggrieved editor whose contributions may have been negatively impacted by the actions of a group of editors who are alleged to be POV-pushing and engaging in WP:GAMES. I invite you to peruse the arbcom request and voice your opinion and experiences, at your leisure. The link is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#WP:NPOV_and_WP:GAMES_in_.22Falkland_Islands.22_and_related_articles

Thank you.Alex79818 (talk) 22:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank u

Hi, i´m glad you liked the Colombia in Popular Culture article. I would like to know your opinion about the article Colombian Declaration of Independence. I think it´s kind of weak and could be improved thank you. xoxo.

Earth flag and coat of arms

Please don't spam your self-made flag and coat of arms all over Wikipedia. Such flags and coats of arms without any widespread use or recognition should not be used on any Wikipedia pages except userpages. Fram (talk) 07:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

I too have some concerns about your apparent mass-spamming. What is this coat of arms? Is it your original design? If so please see WP:OR. If not, please see WP:V and verify that it is in common usage. thanks --Merbabu (talk) 09:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) , as you have to the article Flag of the Earth, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Merbabu (talk) 09:30, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

I too have a question about the flags you seem to be putting on all the talk pages for countries. Where did they come from? Are they your own work? If so, I doubt there will be widespread use for any of them. If you could provide a source for them, it may give them some more credibility. Thanks, Onopearls ^(t/c) 15:48, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Self-made images

Please don't add self-made images to articles, unless they are unambiguous representations of (aspects of) the article. Apart from the flags / coat of arms discussed above, an image like you added to Energy being is pure speculation and original research on your part. The "relative size" and the form of an "energy being" is by definition unknown (or wildly varying from story to story), so any image of them is pure fantasy, and not what we want on Wikipedia. Fram (talk) 15:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Your reply on my user talk page is not convincing. The article does not give a description of what these beings look like (how could it), and your personal interpretation of it adds nothing to the article but a piece of original research. Something like a mermaid or a centaur has a defined image (with variations of course); energy beings don't. Youyr idea of what they might look like is not a valid encyclopedic image. Fram (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Tiger Woods

You mean this? [2]Cadenas2008 (talk) 09:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

List

Hey Fram, it is obvious that there is support from the community to leave those images. Let it go already. It has been 30 days since you added the RfC. Stop reverting my edits please. Out of all the editors involved in the discussion the majority supported the inclusion . Happy new year.--Camilo Sanchez (talk) 16:37, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

First of all, majority vs. minority is irrelevant, it is not a votecount but a discussion. Second, as an involved editor, you should not be the one to decide the consensus (niether should I), nor to act upon your self-declared consensus. Third, please follow WP:BRD: when you are reverted, don't redo your edit, but discuss things. Finally, if you do want a votecount, I see Fram, JohnBlackburne, Ash, Plvekamp, ScienceApologist and 2over0 opposing; and Camilo Sanchez, Abyssal, Martin Hogbin, Wikigratia, Aladdin Sane, The Good Locust, and Labongo supporting. That's 6 opposing and 7 supporting, which is when going by votecount a clear "no consensus", not a "support". Fram (talk) 16:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Discussion at WP:ANI

I invited some outside help at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#RfC problems at Talk:List of alleged alien beings. You are welcome to comment there as well. Fram (talk) 13:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Church of Reality

Hi there. You recently proposed this article for deletion as non-notable; however, it has previously been discussed at Articles for Deletion, back in 2005 (see these links), which makes it ineligible for deletion via WP:PROD. (Yes, even though it was deleted both times.) However, I agree with you that the subject is still not notable, and have re-nominated it for deletion; your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of Reality (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 01:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Colombia semi-protection?

What are you talking about at Talk:Colombia#Semi protection? Brian Jason Drake 07:23, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Be polite

I do not appreciate. "We gotta thank God you don't even have a username dude." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.148.42 (talk) 04:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review

I have closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Haiti earthquake conspiracy theories (2nd nomination), as it is apparent that you believe that the close was incorrect on the first AfD and that there was consensus to delete. The correct way to challenge a close is not to open another AfD, but to seek a deletion review. Please do so. Fences&Windows 01:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Claims of Israeli organ harvesting in Haiti

I urge you to reconsider your position. The article on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is not an article of antisemitic lies, but an article about antisemitic lies. Bigotry thrives on confusion and doublespeak, and an article about a bigoted idea shows how ridiculous it is by presenting it clearly. I believe that this article is similar. Ciao, Jalapenos do exist (talk) 22:07, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Colombiacoatofarms.svg

En pro de seguir mejorando el artículo del Escudo de Colombia en español, quisiera saber si no te molestaría que modificara esta imagen por una que estoy fabricando y que pienso subir a finales de mes. Se que antes no te pedí permiso para modificarla, pero porque eran cambios muy pequeños; en cambio esta vez será casi que una imagen nueva. Hago esto con el fin de no llenar commons de miles de imagenes con diferentes versiones del escudo. Gracias. Shadowxfox (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Roy Ashburn

This tag was highly inappropriate for a biography of a living person. Not only is it often irrelevant to report somebody's "coming out" as a banner for an article, such a term is a colloquialism that is best avoided in the article space. In future, when a person or subject garners press attention after an incident, please use {{current event}}, and not custom-made templates. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Ricky Martin

Please re-read the warning given by PeterSymonds above. Your addition of the same tag to the Ricky Martin article today is completely inappropriate. Do not add these types of custom tags to articles. GlassCobra 21:43, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Colombia Collaboration Invitation

		WikiProject Colombia
		You have been invited to participate in Collaboration of the Month to improve and standardize the List of Presidents of Colombia in hopes of raising it to featured list status.

mijotoba (talk) 23:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Non Free Files in your User Space

Hey there Camilo Sanchez, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Camilo Sanchez/page3. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Network neutrality symbol english.svg

Ive made some changes. Please take a look: commons:File:Network neutrality symbol english.svg. -Agentglory (talk) 01:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Colombian football templates

Greetings,

I understand what you were trying to do. But, the way things are currently done is to keep those templates separate.Digirami (talk) 05:46, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

And the logos were deleted from the template because of possible copyright concerns. Digirami (talk) 05:47, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

PS, what you were trying to do is not a bad idea, but some details need to be worked out. I'll take care of it for you. Digirami (talk) 23:37, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Deportes tolima crest.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deportes tolima crest.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Boyaca chico crest.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boyaca chico crest.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Deletion nomination of Talk:Dell Streak

blanked page

Hi Camilo Sanchez, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Talk:Dell Streak. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text {{db-author}}. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the {{db-author}} tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=FrescoBot}} somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot (msg) 00:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Green party of colombia symbol.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Green party of colombia symbol.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

FIFA brackets

Hello, Camilo Sanchez. You have new messages at Bazonka's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Bazonka (talk) 08:07, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Escudos militares de Colombia

Hola Camilo!

pues los escudos militares que estoy colocando en los artículos corresponden a las versiones heráldicas o sea que tienen los colores correctos sin degradados ni brillos, ademas concuerdan con las descripciones oficiales. Los escudos militares fueron creados teniendo en cuenta la heráldica, sus descripciones manejan el lenguaje técnico y la precisión de dicha ciencia. Te pongo un ejemplo con el escudo de la fuerza aérea, la descripción oficial dice en resumidas cuentas que: es un escudo azul, con un rectángulo amarillo en la parte superior, en el cual irán dos alas de color negro; detrás del escudo estará un águila de color rojo, con la cabeza mirando a la derecha del escudo, el pico abierto mostrando la lengua, con las alas abiertas, la cola esparcida y las dos patas saliendo de los lados inferiores del escudo, por debajo de las alas, que también salen de los lados. El pico, la lengua y las uñas de las garras, irán de color blanco. Las garras sostendrán una cinta ondulada de color amarillo, la cual tendrá un texto en letras mayúsculas y de color púrpura. Además, los escudos que he realizado están basados en los que salen en un libro publicado por los militares, claro que le hago algunas mejoras estéticas.

• 
  escudo azul cielo, no es el azul heráldico. Alas amarillas sobre fondo amarillo; pico cerrado y rojo igual que las uñas; letras negras.
• 
  águila color vinotinto, al igual que el pico, lengua, y uñas; Alas grises; letras negras. El azul y el amarillo del escudo están bien
• 
  Concuerda con toda lo indicado en la descripción oficial. El tono de los colores corresponde con los establecidos por el taller de heráldica de Wikipedia en español.

Sin embargo, y a pesar de que la descripción es muy precisa, el escudo usado por la fuerza aérea en su pagina tampoco cumple con lo indicado. Aunque no es de extrañar, pues en Colombia es muy común ver escudos que no concuerdan con las descripciones, o son mal interpretados, es tanto así que ya varias alcaldías al copiado los escudos que hemos hecho para la Wikipedia. Si el tema de los escudos te interesa mira los wikiproyectos de heráldica tanto de la wiki-inglesa como de la hispana. Saludos SajoR 20:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spain national football team crest.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spain national football team crest.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:30, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spain national football team crest.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spain national football team crest.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:54, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Please have a look at this

I hope this will allow us to focus on more important issues. Vyx (talk) 19:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

chile miners edit

there is a current tag for an ongoing event, when its said and done it will obviously be changed. And its done now, the huge focus of the article will go down and then the editors who are left will change it precidely for the reason you say.Lihaas (talk) 02:59, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dim crest.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dim crest.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Julio sanchez cristo voice bit.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Julio sanchez cristo voice bit.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 05:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Camilo Sanchez. You have new messages at Anna Frodesiak's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ted Williams article

If you haven't seen it already, the Ted Williams article was a speedy keep. Ryan White Jr. (talk) 03:41, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Camilo Sanchez. You have new messages at Anna Frodesiak's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:Palin-crosshairs.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Palin-crosshairs.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Copyright violation

The image File:Map of the united states with crosshairs.jpg that you uploaded at Commons and have been placing in articles here is a copyright violation, cropped from an image here. Please don't claim the work of others as your own. Kelly ^hi! 07:21, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Palin-crosshairs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Palin-crosshairs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Tablet personal computer requested move

As an FYI, there is a move discussion currently taking place relating to Tablet personal computer at Talk:Tablet_personal_computer#Requested_move. --Labattblueboy (talk) 18:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Palin-crosshairs.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Palin-crosshairs.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:42, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Protests page move.

Hi, probably not a great idea to move pages in the middle of an intense discussion. Please check in at the talk page first. Ocaasi (talk) 22:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi, a couple things:

• 1) Please do not cut-and-paste articles from one title to another. This is an improper way to move articles, and violates Wikipedia's licensing requirements.
• 2) Any controversial move, especially on an article as visible as this, must be discussed and agreed on beforehand. Let me stress that I don't necessarily disagree with your move, but you cannot singlehandly change the title. I would strongly suggest opening a requested move discussion.

Thanks for your understanding. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi, can you clarify which title you want restored? (2010–2011 Arab world protests or 2010–2011 Middle East and North Africa protests) Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Not sure who you were asking, but the latter is preferred over the former, but the current name is ok as well. Ocaasi (talk) 00:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Reply vcard

the vcard is not needed as we use bottom template - Template:Middle East and North Africa protests.

You need to open a talk (new) section there b4 you add it, don't revert it back as you fit right, I will reply there aswell.
  – HonorTheKing (talk) 01:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Hernandez Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Hernandez Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Hernandez Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Southwest Airlines Flight 812

Hello friend, I guess you're a newbie, so you want to use the WN-812 article as a test case to see the AFD take its course ... no problem with me. Though I don't a point in pushing for an AFD when the outcome can be predicted without discourse, there is no reason for you to go against common sense because you have free will. Anyways, cheers and good to meet you! --Inetpuppy (talk) 07:10, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

I have been editing in Wikipedia since 2005. Hardly a newbie. My suggestion to delete the article was based on me reading the guidelines of WP:AIRCRASH where I felt the article didn't meet most of the criteria. I have a real life and absolutely no need to test anything. I did what I thought it felt right at the moment. Also. If you are calling me a newbie because my AfD wasn't posted correctly the reason is I have things to do in real life and I didn't realize I wasn't logged in. --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Camilo. In answer to your question, Wikipedia would look like this if we covered every little incident. I've commented at the AfD that editors should stick to the issue, and not comment on who holds what opinion. I'm glad that the AfD is being re-run, as that way a proper consensus can be gained. Mjroots (talk) 11:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Camilo, thanks for closing the AfD. It takes guts to admit one's opinion is contrary to consensus, even if held in good faith. Mjroots (talk) 20:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Camilo, I'm replying here not about the AFD as such, which is obviously over, but about a remark in the media which you included in your comment on the AFD: "In my opinion, the damage was not serious and experts have downplayed the damage with statements such as -Friday's accident gives no cause for concern about the structural integrity of airplanes in their early years of service, say some air safety experts.- as sourced from Christian Monitor website here." I read that article, and it sounds like you misinterpreted what the CSM was trying to say there. (I found the way they phrased their statement to be potentially confusing.) That remark was about relatively new aircraft with few flight miles; in other words, "Just because this 737 had a fuselage rupture doesn't mean flyers should worry about every 737--new ones should be fine." The point was that the 737 in this Southwest incident, like many of Southwest's 737s, is rather old and has been in service for many years, which is why it was potentially at risk for an event like this. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 17:35, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

United Airlines Flight 497

United Airlines Flight 497 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inetpuppy (talk • contribs) 03:13, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

• Comments? Your input is welcome, cheers! --Inetpuppy (talk) 05:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

RE: On the WP Question

Hi. Whilst appreciating that your native language may not be English, it ought to be drawn to your attention that 'Unfortunately this guidelines have also become the escape goat [...]' should read 'Unfortunately these guidelines have also become the scapegoat [...]'. In fact, I'm not sure that scapegoat is the best word to use: excuse would probably do. --Trevj (talk) 11:00, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

FFMM Military Ranks

Hola, Camilo. (Gonna keep it in english as this is the en:wiki) .. Ok, I see your comments on the FFMM ranks page, but so we can coordinate better without adding clutter on that page yet, I have created a sandbox page on my User.. feel free to drop by User:Iceman0108/Sandbox/sandbox5. That way we can discuss easier and then come back to the page with the final edits. I realize part of this discussion may relate to 'personal taste', but we should be able to agree on something that benefits everybody. Now, a few comments on my part:

• On keeping one big table vs separate tables: I consider separate sections are better, as they allow auto TOC, can be linked/referenced easier, and allow for additional text, references, history, etc to be placed within them. I believe it should be kept separate in the 4 sections, as opposed to a single big table. (And it also makes it easier for edits across the multiple articles and interwikis) - We should keep this.
• On use of color: I had set that back to standard class='wikitable', as It seemed 'too colorful'. Besides, Manual of Style (WP:COLOR) suggests not to use color as the ony,way to convey information. But perhaps that is too whitewashed, I might agree. On the sandbox5 test page I have made some changes that I believe look better, and help identify the arms without going crazy as a clown. - Let's find a middle ground
• On the extra lines/insignias: As I said, while I wasn't entirely happy with adding the extra insignias at the time, I did want to keep them so as not to lose additional info, and I had to do it that way in order to be able to reuse the transclusions. But I agree it may get confusing. Reducing the lines means not use transclusion and go back to copy the tables every time. So, what I'd suggest is, keep the 'short' tables in this article, as well as the individual areas of each force, and keep the subpages per arm as 'detail' pages with the additional insignia images. (FAC also has an additional set that wasn't updated quite yet). As much as I hate going back to copypasting the tables 16 times, it seems the only way. - I'll give up this one.

Let me know what u think. Cheers Iceman0108 (talk) 18:40, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carla Rushing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Carla Rushing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ttonyb (talk) 02:32, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi, Camilo! I was simply doing new page patrol and someone else had tagged it for deletion as non-notable. I should have looked at it more closely. The refs were a bit weak for any biography; perhaps that's why it was tagged. I'll put it back right away. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:46, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

• You bet. Have a great weekend! PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:53, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Weinergate

The article Weinergate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOT#NEWS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:43, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Anthony Weiner Twitter photo controversy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Anthony Weiner Twitter photo controversy. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Anthony Weiner. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Anthony Weiner - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Epeefleche (talk) 04:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

notice

Hi ... seems like the AFD notice was a SNAFU of the TWINKLE function, somehow ... apologies. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 15:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Santa fe crest.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Santa fe crest.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Sasha Grey

You might want to take a look at the Wikiproject Pornography main page as it has a fair amount of information and guidelines regarding pornstar bios. Tabercil (talk) 19:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

AFD notice removal at 2011 Virginia earthquake

Just wanted to let you know that the deletion discussion for the article was reopened and is ongoing. Until it is closed, please leave the AFD notice in place at the top of the article. Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle) 20:45, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Camilo Sanchez. You have new messages at Ioeth's talk page.
Message added 20:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle) 20:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)