User talk:Camille1019

Camille1019, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Camille1019! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Nica (toponym), did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Presumably this was accidental - please take care. PamD 00:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Trinidadians page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you recently removed some content from White Ensign without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 01:12, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Guyanese people

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Guyanese people without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 03:39, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 25 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Nigerians page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Width

Hi Camille,
do not used fixed width (a specific amount of pixels, like "350px" for pictures, please. This sets a width for all devices and thus makes the article unreadable on some. What looks good on a PC does not look good on a tablet or smartphone. Just let the pictures adjust to the size determinded for the respective device.
Thanks and kind regards, Grueslayer Let's talk. 04:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hop tf off of my dick bitch. I'll do whatever the fuck I want to & please. If you have a problem with it I will keep on making my edits and you'll have to do nothing but give up. Bye

This response is unacceptable, @Camille1019:. You're expected to behave in a civil manner on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Civility. Respond like this again and you may be blocked from editing. Guettarda (talk) 17:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Trinidad and Tobago, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Trinidadians

Stop vandalizing Trinidadians. 4.3 million is wildly exaggerated and completely unfounded. 89.164.186.170 (talk) 19:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Despite being warned, you continue to make edits like this, this and this. Given your response above, I can only interpret this as intentionally disruptive behaviour. Please stop. Guettarda (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Despite being asked repeatedly to stop adding "fixed width" parameters to images, you have to do so. This is your final warning. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked from editing. Guettarda (talk) 01:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nicki Minaj

Your recent editing history at Nicki Minaj shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Cardi B.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Ss 112 19:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 22:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pink Friday, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TJH2018 talk 02:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 02:50, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Trinidadians. Karst (talk) 05:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 06:00, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]