User talk:Cam46136

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:31, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom

Your name has been mentioned in recent evidence for an arbitration case filed on 2010-11-18. You were not originally named as a party, but I am sending this notice proforma to editors named in evidence, before the workshop period closes. If you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Longevity/Workshop#General discussion, or elsewhere on that page or the case's four talk pages. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, JJB 21:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

WP:DUCK

I come in peace. The jist of WP:DUCK is the old aphorism that if it waddles like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck. We throw around wiki-acronyms a lot as if they are common knowledge. It can be alienating. I hope, on this tiniest of points, I've been helpful. David in DC (talk) 14:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned at WP:Arbitration enforcement

Your name has come up at WP:AE#NickOrnstein with the assertion that you are a member of '110 Club Wikipedia.' The significance (if any) of membership in that group is now being discussed in the AE thread. You may respond at WP:AE if you wish. Since you appear to be a participant, I am leaving you a case notice for the Longevity sanctions. This step is required by some of our processes. Thank you.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Longevity if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Longevity#Final decision. EdJohnston (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

for your always entertaining posts. I've replied to your most recent inquiry where you left it, on my talk page. Have a special day. You know what? Have a superspecial day. That's 10% better than just a special day.

Which reminds me, you've described my efforts as "endless." Strictly speaking, given what we know about human longevity, I think that's impossible. It would be like cold fusion or a perpetual motion machine.

But if you know of some way to make my participation in this grand collaborration truly endless, you've succedded where Ponce de Leon and thousands of others failed. Please write up your results and have them published. Once they are, please let me know how to access the information. Then I can write a wikipedia article about it. Not to mention live long enough to see my Washington Nationals make the Major League Baseball playoffs. David in DC (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]