User talk:Callmemirela/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Callmemirela. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Alba's job on "Jane the Virgin"
Why isn't it relevant? I'm sure people wonder and now it has been documented.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Vchimpanzee: Pleas don't represent yourself as if you're speaking for the community. You're only talking about yourself. I hate it when people do that. To answer your question, I don't see how describing Alba's job is in any way relevant to the show and also please see WP:UNIVERSE. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 18:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- So you're saying no one in the world knows this information? And I don't know or care what "universe" means. Some people want to make this process entirely too complicated.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:02, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- I have an idea. While it took me a long time to accept the idea that not all trivia belongs here, see if you can find this information online somewhere. Then my goal will be met.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Vchimpanzee: Okay, no. Wikipedia is not about first come, first served basis (or if no one reports it, then I will, in this case). If you can find that Alba's job is relevant to the show without having to update on her past or present in a WP:UNIVERSE way, be my guest. Otherwise, my position stands. She has a job, great for Alba. There is no need to update every new information that comes along when a) no one else writes it and/or b) it is little details that is not relevant to the show. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 19:52, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- I just believe what the person does for a living is something people want to know, regardless of how much that is used in the show. Someone once told me certain information needs to come from a source other than the show itself but all that "universe" stuff is too confusing. Perhaps other articles are done wrong. Regardless, your position may be depriving anyone who doesn't see the specific episode of the ability to find this information somewhere online. I checked and didn't see it, but that doesn't mean I checked everywhere. It is Alba, isn't it? I used to think that was short for Abuela.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Vchimpanzee: Okay, no. Wikipedia is not about first come, first served basis (or if no one reports it, then I will, in this case). If you can find that Alba's job is relevant to the show without having to update on her past or present in a WP:UNIVERSE way, be my guest. Otherwise, my position stands. She has a job, great for Alba. There is no need to update every new information that comes along when a) no one else writes it and/or b) it is little details that is not relevant to the show. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 19:52, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- I have an idea. While it took me a long time to accept the idea that not all trivia belongs here, see if you can find this information online somewhere. Then my goal will be met.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- So you're saying no one in the world knows this information? And I don't know or care what "universe" means. Some people want to make this process entirely too complicated.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:02, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Okay, you may actually be right. The job has only been mentioned twice, and the second time was in the episode where she quit. Now she works at the hotel gift shop. While I think this is information that should be stated somewhere for anyone who might want to know, it's now hard to justify including it here. Yes, I'm several weeks behind.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
WikiCup 2016 November newsletter: Final results
The final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:
- First Place -
Cas Liber (submissions) - Second Place -
MPJ-DK (submissions) - Third Place -
Adam Cuerden (submissions)
In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
- Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a three-way tie with themselves for two FAs in each of R2, R3, and R5).
- Good Article – MPJ-DK had 14 GAs promoted in R3.
- Featured List –
Calvin999 (submissions) produced 2 FLs in R2 - Featured Pictures – Adam Cuerden restored 18 images to FP status in R4.
- Featured Portal –
SSTflyer (submissions) produced the only FPO of the Cup in R2. - Featured Topic –
Cyclonebiskit (submissions) and Calvin were each responsible for one FT in R3 and R2, respectively. - Good Topic – MPJ-DK created a GT with 9 GAs in R5.
- Did You Know – MPJ-DK put 53 DYKs on the main page in R4.
- In The News –
Dharmadhyaksha (submissions) and 
Muboshgu (submissions), each with 5 ITN, both in R4. - Good Article Review – MPJ-DK completed 61 GARs in R2.
Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2017 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email)
WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup
 Greetings, all! We would like to announce the start of the 4th GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been three GA Cups, which were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 400 nominations listed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time. The 4th GA Cup will begin on November 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on February 28, 2017), but this may change based on participant numbers. We may take a break in December for the holidays, depending on the results of a poll of our participants taken shortly after the competition begins. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same, as will the scoring. Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on November 14, 2016. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now! If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges. Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. We apologize for the delay in sending out this message until after the competition has started. Thank you to Krishna Chaitanya Velaga for aiding in getting this message out. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
|
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Reply
It's because of Tenebrae. He/she warns me like this.
"Hi, IreneTandry. Nothing against the production designer; just following consensus. Per WP:FILMMOS, we don't list what are defined as "non-notable" awards, i.e., those without Wikipedia pages (or with newly created stub pages). Thank you for contacting me and engaging in discussion.
I spoke too soon with my thank you. It appears that in addition to violating WP:FILMMOS, you are edit-warring and ignoring WP:BRD to do so. You've been editing since April, so you're no longer a newbie and should know this. If you continue to edit-war to violate WikiProject Film, an admin will be notified."
You can check Arrival without accolades like Hamilton Behind the Camera or Hollywood Music in Media Awards... And actually, I add that two accolades on Arrival with the sources.
Tenebrae called me violating user because I only add the small accolades with the sources, not the big accolades such as Academy or Golden Globe Awards, and you also called me violating user because I remove that small accolades as Tenebrae's suggestion. So you can blame Tenebrae, not me.
IreneTandry (talk) 16:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- @IreneTandry: Tenebrae is right. However, you did not indicate why you removed the section. That is crucial and important. If you just remove a section without saying why is not okay. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 16:12, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Young & Sofia
"Previously in development" does not mean more than 'not picked up' That is what previously in development means. If it were still in development, or being produced, then it would state that it was currently in development, or ordered to series. What else would previously in development mean? It does not mean it was in development, and now ordered to series, is currently being produced, or anything like that. If it were still being made, redeveloped, etc, then it would not be listed as it is, or it would be moved to Freeform's currently in development page. --Jonathan Joseph (talk) 21:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Jonathanjoseph81: Next time, please respond on your talk page per my box on top of my talk page. Again, you are speculating a show's status. It does not explicitly mention the show not being picked up. No other source mentions it not being picked up, including Freeform (The Hollywood Reporter). You are speculating a show's status. No other sources state it was cancelled and recent sources still say it is being developed. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- @callmemirela It is not speculating, it specifically says the word "previously." Freeform is not going to go out and say "We aren't picking up ____insert show name here___." No source is going to say 'cancelled' since it was not a show, pilots can not be cancelled.
- @Jonathanjoseph81: Most shows have an update even when the pilot is not picked up. Like I have said, it does not explicitly mention that the show was not picked up and a reliable source indicated that the show is still in development and no other sources say the opposite. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:23, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- @callmemirela It is not speculating, it specifically says the word "previously." Freeform is not going to go out and say "We aren't picking up ____insert show name here___." No source is going to say 'cancelled' since it was not a show, pilots can not be cancelled.
Reference errors on 10 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the That's So Raven page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
What's the diff?
I'm not arguing about whether or not Donald Trump is President-elect. But anyways, it'll eventually be changed to Elected President either on 19 December 2016, 6 January 2017 or 20 January 2017. GoodDay (talk) 23:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
New Page Review needs your help
Hi Callmemirela,
As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).
Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.
Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.
It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.
(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Request for 5 minute survey
Hi! I'm a researcher from the University of Minnesota conducting a study on LGBT user contributions to Wikipedia. Would you be willing to answer a short five minute survey? If so, I would appreciate if you could drop me an email at leung085@umn.edu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weiwensg (talk • contribs) 23:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Callmemirela. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Please note that United States presidential election, 2016 and several related articles are under a 1RR (see the talk page for more information). Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 03:00, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Some private matters about Talk:Protests against Donald Trump
A new user called Brave Edit Warrior just voiced his support for that IP editor's content. But I can't help but feel very suspicious about this. Just wanted to let you know. Parsley Man (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Parsley Man: Thank you for notifying me. I am avoiding this whole topic for now unless I am required for whatever reason. I am letting this play out and see what an admin says. However, now that this "new" editor came in, the username implies a sock (Brave Edit Warrior, really? We all just edit warred over the content), as well as how they write
"(It's "lead", by the way.)Brave Edit Warrior (talk)"
(BNE) and" (namely, WHY are people protesting? You cannot have a protest article without giving a statement of why people are protesting in the lead.)63.143.194.13 (talk)"
(notice the lack of spacing between the parenthesis and signature) and the giant fact that the user is brand new and created 10 minutes ago! Add this to ANI por favor! Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)- Got it. ;) Parsley Man (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Parsley Man: Gracias (: Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- I actually chose to report it at WP:SPI because I was unsure if ANI was the place for it. In the process, I discovered another potential sock for the IP user. Oh, joy. Parsley Man (talk) 22:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Parsley Man: I think ANI deals with everything. I have gone there to complain about a disruptive IP serial sock, who was blocked. Regardless, thank you so much for your help! Here's to hope we get something good out of it. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Guess what? Seems like it did. Apparently this all may have been the work of Kingshowman. Parsley Man (talk) 22:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Parsley Man: Wow, I did not see this coming. Were you the one that merged it with Kingshowman? Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- No. It was Bbb23, who must've seen it and made the connection. Parsley Man (talk) 22:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Parsley Man: Wow, I also owe him my gratitude and thanks. Since the newest IP, other IPs and user were blocked, I will restore the good version of the article until we establish consensus. Muchas gracias for your help! I can't thank you enough! Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:51, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- No. It was Bbb23, who must've seen it and made the connection. Parsley Man (talk) 22:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Parsley Man: Wow, I did not see this coming. Were you the one that merged it with Kingshowman? Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:47, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Guess what? Seems like it did. Apparently this all may have been the work of Kingshowman. Parsley Man (talk) 22:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Parsley Man: I think ANI deals with everything. I have gone there to complain about a disruptive IP serial sock, who was blocked. Regardless, thank you so much for your help! Here's to hope we get something good out of it. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- I actually chose to report it at WP:SPI because I was unsure if ANI was the place for it. In the process, I discovered another potential sock for the IP user. Oh, joy. Parsley Man (talk) 22:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Parsley Man: Gracias (: Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Got it. ;) Parsley Man (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
You got it. ;) Parsley Man (talk) 22:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
New Page Review - newsletter
- Breaking the back of the backlog
If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
- Second set of eyes
Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
- Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote
With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.
Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
United States presidential election, 2016
I would suggest that you review this:here.--ML (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- @MaverickLittle: That is not my position to review as I am not interested. Your lack of understand polices properly suggests that you can't grasp them and maybe competence issues. The edit you called vandalism is not. Plain simple. While it may be another form of editing, it's not vandalism and I want to make it clear to you that you need to reread policies, especially what vandalism is and isn't. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 01:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
The Voice
I'm sorry but I actually did a productive edit on The Voice Season 11 page. Could you check what you're removing before doing it? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrazyGaal (talk • contribs) 18:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
- @CrazyGaal: No, it's not productive. You are being disruptive by readding predictions, unsourced and false information. If you readd the same content or similar, I will report you to adminstrators. You've been doing this for nearly a year. It has go to stop. Wikipedia isn't a fansite, it's an encyclopedia. If you want to post your fan fictions, please go to a forum. Wikipedia isn't a forum. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 23:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
WikiCup December newsletter: WikiCup 2017
On 1 January 2017, WikiCup 2017 (the 10th Annual WikiCup) will begin. This year we are trying something a little different – monetary prizes.
For the WC2017 the prizes will be as follows (amounts are based in US$ and will be awarded in the form of an online Amazon gift certificate):
- First place – $200
- Second & Third place – $50 each
- Category prizes – $25 per category (which will be limited to FA, FL, FP, GA, and DYK for 2017). Winning a category prize does not require making it to the final round.
Note: Monetary prizes are a one-year experiment for 2017 and may or may not be continued in the future. In order to be eligible to receive any of the prizes above, the competing Wikipedia account must have a valid/active email address.
After two years as a WikiCup judge, Figureskatingfan is stepping down. We thank her for her contributions as a WikiCup judge. We are pleased to announce that our newest judge is two-time WikiCup champion Cwmhiraeth.
The judges for the 2017 WikiCup are Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email).
Signups are open now and will remain open until 5 February 2017. You can sign up here.
If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Jack Fellere, Donald Trump and the 2020 election
Please note that Donald Trump was elected president this year. I don't like this at all but there's nothing that we can do about it. As the incumbent, He has been mentioned as the presumptive Republican nominee in 2020 In the mainstream media.
AS to Jack Fallere, there is no evidence that he's running for anything besides a pro-forma letter to the FEC. How was this discovered? There were no mentions of this "announcement" in any media, nothing not print, TV or online. This smacks of "original research." I didn't do anything wrong. Arglebargle79 (talk) 22:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Arglebargle79: There's a discussion on the talk page. Take it there. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:55, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
Hello, Callmemirela! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia!
Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Mr rnddude (talk) 10:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}
Of particular consequence I believe are; "Feliz Natal" which I believe is Portuguese, "Sretan Božic" which is Croatian but Serbians would understand equally well (Srećan Božic for Serbians), and "Joyeux Noël" in French. Hopefully your holidays are getting better. Mr rnddude (talk) 10:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Mr rnddude: Thank you so much. That was so nice of you (: And yes, that is in Portuguese and I don't speak Croatian or Serbian so I would have no idea. I also wish you happy holidays and the best. May 2017 be better. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 00:36, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Lucky then that I speak both. I know you don't speak Serbian, only mentioned it cause of your Serb ancestry UBX. Mr rnddude (talk) 07:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry Merry
|
Season's Greetings, Callmemirela! At this wonderful time of year, I would like to give season’s greetings to all the fellow Wikipedians I have interacted with in the past! May you have a wonderful holiday season! MarnetteD|Talk 16:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC) |
|
RfC
You may want to participate in the RfC at Talk:United States presidential election in the District of Columbia, 2016. MB298 (talk) 19:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. If you'd like to add anything. :) Under Trolling by 216.15.70.128. Amaury (talk | contribs) 08:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Adele
The dispute has occurred between myself and the user several times, much longer than the recent 12 hours. Erzan (talk) 04:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- User:Callmemirela - You asked whether the DRN thread should be closed, and said that Ezran only opened it out of frustration at their edits being reverted. You are correct, but that doesn't mean that we need a DRN thread for the purpose. An editor who reverts but doesn't discuss on the article talk page isn't likely to discuss at DRN. I see that there has been very little further edit activity and no further discussion at the talk page or at DRN. So I think that I will close the DRN thread. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Callmemirela,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Amaury (talk | contribs) 08:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)