User talk:CalfRaiser150

March 2024

Hello, I'm Annh07. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

is this your life? watching me make edits and reverting half of them? My god CalfRaiser150 (talk) 14:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not that we are watching your edits, rather we are watching certain pages which you happen to edit, and reverting as and when necessary. Kiwipete (talk) 05:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont appreciate you editing my talk page. CalfRaiser150 (talk) 08:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

Since you seem not to understand Not web host, I've protected your user page from further editing. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC) ⋅[reply]

Oh hi Jim sorry. I'm a new user. I didn't know this. I would like to gain access back so I can use the userpage for its original purpose CalfRaiser150 (talk) 19:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, unprotected for now. It's just for you to tell us about your contributions to Wikipedia Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 20

Are you intending to add all the Columbine High School Shooting victims to this page? I think that would be giving undue weight to a single event. Deb (talk) 14:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No just the most notable ones. Is that an issue? These 2 started the martyrdom myth and are also the only ones that have their own wiki pages so I decided they needed to be on the birthday list. CalfRaiser150 (talk) 19:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's an issue because the shooting is already present as an event, so adding a further two entries relating to that event seems undue. Deb (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 10:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you run this website? I'm not making unconstructive edits, I just disagree with some of your edits so I reverted them. CalfRaiser150 (talk) 12:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you reverted at Google Earth breaks the line incorrectly. The edit you reverted at South Vietnam is vandalism. Annh07 (talk) 12:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay you might be right this time but I will be watching your edits to monitor mistakes. CalfRaiser150 (talk) 13:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

Why did you remove my comment over at the Trump page? Slatersteven (talk) 14:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i Didnt CalfRaiser150 (talk) 17:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the diff [[1]] or did you think this was another account? Slatersteven (talk) 10:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Ingenuity (t • c) 14:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:CalfRaiser150

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:CalfRaiser150 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Widefox; talk 14:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CalfRaiser150 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am trying to be productive and help build wikipedia but I keep being bullied and harrassed by certain individuals. If you unblock me I will try to make things right. CalfRaiser150 (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC) CalfRaiser150 (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am trying to be productive and help build wikipedia but I keep being bullied and harrassed by certain individuals. If you unblock me I will try to make things right. CalfRaiser150 (talk) 17:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CalfRaiser150 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

okay i understand why you blocked me and I won't do it again. I promise. I want to help build wikipedia.

Decline reason:

OK, if you understand you were blocked, tell us why you were blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason is that I accidentally reverted Steven Crowders edits. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} Sorry I mean slatersteven

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CalfRaiser150 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for reverting SlaterStevens edits and i wont do it again.

Decline reason:

That is only one very, very, small aspect of the block. 331dot (talk) 19:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No it isn't that's what I got banned for. Before then, everything was fine.CalfRaiser150 (talk) 19:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CalfRaiser150 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was banned for making multiple disruptive edits but I won't do it again. Im sorry

Decline reason:

Well, that's a start, but for an unblock you will have to go into more detail about the disruptive edits you made. PhilKnight (talk) 08:30, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CalfRaiser150 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for the disruptive edits to Slatersteven and I will not do it again. I want to contribute to this encyclopedia.CalfRaiser150 (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This really doesn't address the reasons for your block and shows zero introspection. I don't think that you currently have the ability to edit Wikipedia productively. As you mature, this will hopefully change, but at this time I don't believe unblocking you will benefit the encyclopedia. As this is your fifth substandard appeal, I've revoked your access to this page and you will need to use WP:UTRS if you wish to appeal this block in the future. Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.