User talk:Cal1407

Welcome!

Hello, Calvin Wisanto, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 10:45, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your greetings. I hope that my contribution can help Wikipedia to grow bigger and can make it into a better quality. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 10:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Presidente Nicolau Lobato International Airport with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah:: Thank you for reminding me about this issue. I shall be more careful in the future. By the way, I have edited the page because the data there is inaccurate. Thank you. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 20 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Equipment of the Indonesian Army page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Calvin Wisanto, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Papua conflict has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MPS1992 (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MPS1992:: Thank you for reminding me about this issue. I am not aware of these rules, so I just want to say sorry for the inconvenient. I will make sure to be more careful in the future. Thank you. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 04:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ternate City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan Aji Muhammad Sulaiman Airport

What's up with all the reverts at Sultan Aji Muhammad Sulaiman Airport? There's no clear explanation of what's going on. Please provide one—here or at Talk:Sultan Aji Muhammad Sulaiman Airport—so that I can understand what's going on. Otherwise, I'll likely semi-protect the article to prevent it from continuing, and I'll go back to the last stable version. —C.Fred (talk) 17:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred:: I just want to add some pictures and improve the article. But for an unknown reason some anonymous user keeps reverting my edit. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 07:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Your recent editing history at Sultan Aji Muhammad Sulaiman Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. clpo13_(talk) 23:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Equipment of the Indonesian Air Force (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Equipment of the Indonesian Air Force instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Equipment of the Indonesian Air Force and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Calvin Wisanto, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Sultan Aji Muhammad Sulaiman Airport a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -©2016 Compassionate727^{(Talk)(Contributions)} 14:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves break the article history, so there are copyright problems to move articles that way. Please ask for help with moving the pages if it's clear they should be moved, or start discussion on the move via the WP:Requested moves process. —C.Fred (talk) 15:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for addressing this issue. I shall be more careful in the future. I am not so aware of this "cut-and-paste move". Thankk you Calvin Wisanto (talk) 15:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aceh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sabang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese transcription in Indonesian-related article

Your recent edits on adding Chinese transcription in Indonesian related articles, such as Bandung, is not necessary. This is wikipedia english, not wikipedia 中文/Chinese. If people want to know how Chinese spelled and called Bandung, just go to wikipedia chn/zh/中文. In wikipedia English, addition of foreign spellings or names in the article is allowed in relevant or native name (in this case Indonesian and Sundanese). Thank you. Gunkarta talk 12:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gunkarta There are many Chinese people in Bandung. Just as Sundanese, Chinese is considered a native language by several Chinese-speaking people in Bandung. Therefore, I believe that Chinese transcription in the article is also needed. Moreover, if Dutch is not a native language, why are you not deleting the Dutch translation? Thank you. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 13:03, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Simple, Chinese is not recognized as official language in Indonesia. Chinese Indonesians are more plenty in Medan and Pontianak, compared to Bandung. Chinese is still a minority in Bandung. Demographic composition aside, I think it is more important to note the official languages are those to be important enough to be included in transcription of cities infoboxes. This is english wikipedia, so english name trump other names (examplesː The Hague over Den Haag). "Bandung" in english and Indonesian is exactly the same. In Bandung, the officially recognized languages is Indonesian and native Sundanese, as evidence in Bandung street signs that written in Indonesian and Sundanese script, none of Bandung's street signs are written in Chinese. The Dutch old transcription "Bandoeng" is probably to respect the historic origin of the city which was established during colonial Dutch East Indies, I don't mind to delete it. The key word is officially recognize languages which Chinese is not. Go to Singapore article and you can see transcription in english, malay, tamil and chinese names for spelling Singapore. Simply because Singapore recognized these languages as their official languages. But then go to San Francisco and you will not see any chinese transcription in that city infobox, despite the city has significant overseas Chinese population. The reason is simple, the official languages in USA is overwhelmingly english, any Chinese transcription will be considered, probably as imposing of Chinese influence over USA. I think in this sense Bandung is more similar to SF than SG. So far, in most of this Indonesian cities and region, the officially recognize languages are Bahasa Indonesia and local dialects. Imposing "Chinese text" in Indonesian related articles is somewhat innacurate. This is similar issues to "tamil" and "chinese" text imposing on Malaysian-related articles. They have significant Tamil and Chinese population, yes, but tamil and chinese dialect are not considered as official languages in Malaysia in par to Malay. Gunkarta talk 07:58, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Denel NTW-20— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 17:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That was a typho. Sorry :) Calvin Wisanto (talk) 17:56, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited El Tari Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Bandara-sipil-RANAI-diresmikan.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bandara-sipil-RANAI-diresmikan.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Terminal-baru-bandara-raja-haji-fisabilillah.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Terminal-baru-bandara-raja-haji-fisabilillah.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:59, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Mopahairportterminal.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mopahairportterminal.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Matahoraairportwakatobi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Matahoraairportwakatobi.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:01, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:072810 wamenabandara.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:072810 wamenabandara.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:01, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Bandara-kalimarau 20160425 154702.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bandara-kalimarau 20160425 154702.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:02, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- My apology, but could you explain the issue in a simpler language? Thanks. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 17:09, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Alor-Airport.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alor-Airport.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:1513036turis-di-NTT780x390.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:1513036turis-di-NTT780x390.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:37, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You non-free images

Hi,

You have uploaded many airport images as non-free content. You should be aware of Wikipedia's non-free content policy. The non-free content can only beused if it meets all of the non-free content criteria. In particular, point 1 which is about replaceablity is not about whether you can find a free image, but whether one could be reasonably made. As the images are for existing airports, free images could easily be made by somebody going to the airport and taking a picture released under a free license, as such, these images all fail to satisy point 1. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 14:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but could you explain more about point 1? I still do not really understand? Thanks. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 14:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps an example would be clearer. Let's take File:Juwatairport.jpg as an example. It is a non-free image being used to illustrate the article on Juwata International Airport. That airport exists, is operational, and accessible to the public at large. You, or I, or anybody else could potentially travel to Juwata International Airport and take a photo of it and release it under a free license. This means that a free image could reasonably be expected to be made for this airport, thus any non-free image of the airport is unable to satisfy point 1. Does this help? -- Whpq (talk) 18:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Bandara-ruteng-296x222.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bandara-ruteng-296x222.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:40, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:BIma-Airport-RPA-296x198.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BIma-Airport-RPA-296x198.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Terminal-gedung-Ende.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Terminal-gedung-Ende.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Tambolakaairport.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tambolakaairport.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Copy-of-bandar-HO-1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Copy-of-bandar-HO-1.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:MutiaraSISAl-JufrieAirport1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MutiaraSISAl-JufrieAirport1.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ngurahraiintsirport.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ngurahraiintsirport.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sultanthahaairport.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sultanthahaairport.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Sentaniairport.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sentaniairport.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Komodoairport.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Komodoairport.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Juwatairport.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Juwatairport.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo-Kementerian-Perhubungan-Indonesia.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-Kementerian-Perhubungan-Indonesia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ngurahraiintsirport.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ngurahraiintsirport.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agremments

Hello, We Know it's true the M109A4 Is Procuments but it will revent back. Otherwise, Can you help me a Favour.60.50.52.67 (talk) 08:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, can you speak proper English, since I do not really understand what are you talking about. Cheers. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 08:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I Know, But I Still have a English Problem. Please ?.60.50.52.67 (talk) 09:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's Okey If You don't Understand In English. Sorry about for the Raisict cause I Always Thinking why Indoensian Always Blaming on Us. You will see on Youtube. But for Now, If you help me to Update The Malaysian Armed Forces Modernized Weapons and Arms. I Will Give you a Updated from Other Sources from Places to places.60.50.52.67 (talk) 09:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I can't help you. I do not have a good knowledge of military equipments of the Malaysian Armed Forces. And please, STOP reverting my edits in the article Equipment of the Indonesian Army. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 11:43, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bro, I Offer you.60.50.52.67 (talk) 06:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do explain what is this "offer" you are talking about. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 08:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To Mordenize the Malaysian arme dforces. it has been no Update yet.60.50.52.67 (talk) 01:36, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said,I do not have a good knowledge regarding the Malaysian Armed Forces. Therefore, I can't help you. Calvin Wisanto (talk)

Now I Know why you Don't Want to help on Malingsial, Cause you are too prefect and Too Powerfull and Malingsial. Forget it.60.50.52.67 (talk) 04:05, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yet you make another racist statement. Thats it. You have gone too far. Im reporting you. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 04:45, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yet you Don't want to coporatted with Other Articles.60.50.52.67 (talk) 04:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll say this ONE more time. I wish I can cooperate with you. But I can't because I DO NOT have a good knowledge regarding the Malaysian Armed Forces! Get It? By the way, why don't YOU do it yourself, since you seem really interested. Calvin Wisanto (talk) 04:39, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BEACAUSE IM NOT A GOOD FOR THE REFERENCE !!!. YOU GOT IT !!!!.60.50.52.67 (talk) 13:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then I CAN'T help you, if I do not have a reference! Calvin Wisanto (talk) 13:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tambolaka airport.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tambolaka airport.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Calvin Wisanto. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

~~Hi Calvin Wisanto. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:~~
Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.

Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.

Rollback should never be used to edit war.

If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.

Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 22:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC) Revoked due to the fact that you began edit warring with it almost immediately. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Revert

I think you are wrong.

Threating Without Reason

If you are wrong, I will report you to the admin first.

January 2017

Your recent editing history at Sultan Aji Muhammad Sulaiman Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Zupotachyon Ping me (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. CWJakarta (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring

Your edits to Sultan Aji Muhammad Sulaiman Airport are well over the line for edit warring and you are subject to be blocked. Hopefully an admin will see that you were trying to do some good and won't block you, but there is no exemption for good faith edits. Please stop. --Adam in MO Talk 03:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamfinmo: Please accept my apology for what I've done. I'll try my best in the future that this won't happen again. CWJakarta (talk) 03:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries mate. Check out the three revert rule for more information. I have asked that the page be semi-protected so only logged in users can edit it and I have reported the IP for edit warring. Good luck friend. --Adam in MO Talk 03:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamfinmo: Thanks. CWJakarta (talk) 03:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Sultan Aji Muhammad Sulaiman Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You were warned multiple times to stop edit warring and you persisted. My next edit will be to report you to the 3RR noticeboard where you are sure to be blocked for disruptive abuse of editing privileges.--Adam in MO Talk 03:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But I did not revert the article. It was the anonymous user who revert it. CWJakarta (talk) 03:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't insult my intelligence. It is all there in the history. Just because you didn't hit the rollback or undo button doesn't matter. You still revered their edit abusively here is the link to it . --Adam in MO Talk 03:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:CWJakarta reported by User:Adamfinmo (Result: ). Thank you. Adam in MO Talk 03:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Equipment of the Indonesian Air Force

Hello, CWJakarta. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Equipment of the Indonesian Air Force".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TopCipher (talk) 14:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chang Bogo-class submarine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 18:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CWJakarta. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Dear CWJakarta, thank you for your kind appreciations and I would also look forward with cooperation between us as Wikipedia editors. I am also trying my best in editing articles related to Indonesian Armed Forces, Police, and Government topics. AWG97 (talk) 04:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at NAM Air, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:12, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi CWJakarta. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 18:04, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dharma-jala-prajatama.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dharma-jala-prajatama.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cal1407 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. I did not feel doing anything wrong and I was suddenly blocked from editing. Cal1407 (talk) 06:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: This is my IP: Public 139.192.252.21 and this is my Local IP: 192.168.1.102. Cal1407 (talk) 15:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Try now! --Yamla (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Cal1407 (talk) 15:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport is the most common

We do not use official name as an article title, we use the most commonly used name. I searched on Google, using exact word setting (on Advanced Search), Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport is the most common name.--Doraemon27 (talk) 05:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Central Sulawesi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Maluku, Cocoa, Batavia, Buol, Kaili, Banggai and Mamasa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cal1407. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOURCE

Can you provide sources for this info? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

West Papua

@Cal1407: Despite claiming that you "added sources" - most the text is still unreferenced. I'm removing them all for now and please use reference tags if you add them back. Juxlos (talk) 19:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Juxlos: I understand that some of the articles are lacking sources so I am currently trying to add them. However, can you please explain why you revert all of my edits in the article Central Sulawesi, even though there are very many sources there. Thanks. Cal1407 (talk) 04:58, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Juxlos: I suggest that for now I'll put back my edits and add the Template:Unreferenced while I'm adding the reference

@Cal1407: Wikipedia policy WP:UNSOURCED states that any unreferenced statements can and should be removed. Find the sources before adding them back. If you revert them before adding sources for every statement, I will remove them. Juxlos (talk) 07:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And no - the Unreferenced tag is not an acceptable placeholder for sources. I will assume you mase up everything written there unless you source them. In the case of Central Sulawesi you also cited a couple things that seems to be books but are not provided anywhere as a link or even book name. Juxlos (talk) 07:19, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cal1407: Please stop copy-pasting 20,000 bytes of text while only citing 10% of them - that isn't "adding sources" - everything not obvious must be cited. Juxlos (talk) 16:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Central Sulawesi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Maluku, Cocoa, Batavia, Buol, Kaili, Banggai and Mamasa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Kalimantan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pepper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

recent edits

you have been warned before on this talk page - adding large volumes of text with no WP:RS for WP:V is WP:OR and has to be reverted, and if you keep adding at the rate that you are, some enterprising admin will probably block you for your troubles.

Do you have any idea about WP:NOT and WP:ABOUT and you recent editing... ? JarrahTree 07:12, 22 May 2019 (UTC

@JarrahTree: Excuse me? I have added like a lot of references there and you still say that there are no sources? What the hell? Can you at least please check the edits fully and throughly before telling me this? Cal1407 (talk) 07:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: If you check it again, before I edit the article, there was only 27 references. Now there are 108 references. And you still say that I'm violating Wikipedia guidelines? What the actual ****? Cal1407 (talk) 07:59, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - I was sure I had seen a diff where there appeared to be no added refs at all - that is my problem, sorry about that.

I would not say you are violating anything - it is more of a case where very large additions can at time be deceptive in the 'diff' format - as I say, sorry, sometimes very large additions can be difficult to ascertain on quick glimpses, I assure you I will be more careful the next time I look. However, you will find when you add such large volumes to articles, that it is not always so easy to review.

Thanks for adding to the Indonesian project - there are so few editors doing that these days. JarrahTree 08:13, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: We all make mistakes, and judging from the size of my edits, it is easy for you to make this kind of mistake. I will of course forgive you, but try to be more careful from now on. Thank You! Cal1407 (talk) 08:18, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks, you will find the longer you are on wikipedia - it is very little do with forgiveness, you will find there is much more emphasis on something being important that there is viable and valid material in wikipedia - some editors wouldnt take the time for cordiality in either direction - we are lucky we are speaking :) - as for care, I agree you need to take care and I do - it is a two way street, as large additions are not always easy to negotiate, and can cause problems. JarrahTree 08:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Riau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesian Military Flags.

Hello Cal1407, i left a 'message' earlier but i didn't realise it was wikipedia commons. So i thought i will add a new one here. Forgive me if its a redundant.

So i recently noticed that you have added a Flag for TNI, and i'm asking you to do the same and add one for the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Because the one i could found are from older sites, and usually doesn't have the best quality, so i would be really thankful if you upload a new one to Wikipedia/Commons, so that in can be used by others as well with ease. --EvoSwatch (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EvoSwatch: Hi! Sorry I just managed to read your message right now. Very well, I'll try to make the flags if I have the time. Thanks. Cal1407 (talk) 10:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cal1407: I appreciate your time, thank you very much i hope this doesn't bothers you. -EvoSwatch (talk) 12:41, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari

I invite you to please join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari.

Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects.

I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you.

Thank your for the work that you do on Wiki[mp]edia! Peaceray (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to List of military special forces units, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. - wolf 09:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have added the sources. Thank you. Cal1407 (talk) 12:26, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Belitung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malay.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ngurah Rai International Airport

Thanks for adding a proper source in the article. Adding a source in the summary is not sufficient, and Flightradar is not considered to be a good source. The Banner talk 10:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kangean language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carakan, Javanese and Hanacaraka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of airports in Indonesia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:10, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please elaborate on what "reliable source" that needs to be added for my edits? All I did was trying to make that article conform to Wikipedia's standards of airport list by countries, such as List of airports in Malaysia. My edits include:

- Removing unnecessary local transliteration

- Sorting the table alphabetically

- Adding new airports/airports that are not on the list

- Adding new and separate table for military and defunct airports

- Minor edits to the province column of New Guinean airports as the Papua province has recently been split into new provinces

- Add airport coordinates (WIP)

In my opinion, these edits don't really need a reference. However, if you really insist on adding one, please do tell me what kind of reference that can be added. Thank you. Cal1407 (talk) 02:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Updating and expansion of the airports list is no problem, but your edits should not be removing the existing citations without good reason - in this case, an article that had 24 citations in the References section was cut to 11. You can try the expansion again, but ideally it should have more citations than when you started, at least for the most significant additions and changes. If newer information is available, an older citation can be replaced with a newer one. (also see Wikipedia's verifiability policy. Dl2000 (talk) 01:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, I'll add back all the removed references for now. Thank you. Cal1407 (talk) 01:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jalaluddin Airport

Sorry, have to double check it. You say that one "ID"-connection is closed. Is that the one of Batik Air? But why do you remove two airlines (Citylink and Aviastar)? Ow, and what I did was reverting edits of a non blocked sockpuppet. The Banner talk 09:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. "ID" is the airline code of Batik Air. The reason why I removed those flights is that they're no longer operating those routes, according to Flightradar24. While I can agree that person is a sockpuppet, I can affirm that his/her edits are not always wrong; he/she only forgot to put the references. Cal1407 (talk) 09:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but it is a serial sock puppeteer so you have the right to just revert its edits. The Banner talk 11:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minority parameter discussion

There is a discussion on how to use minority parameter on Infobox language at Template talk:Infobox language#Minority parameter that may be of interest to you. Ckfasdf (talk) 12:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhoho International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kediri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Lion Air Group destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kediri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Makassarese language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Konjo language.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from Makassarese language to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Take also care to include the references of the Indonesian source article when they are cited by means of an sfn-template.

The same goes for Palembang language, Orang Pulo language, only to mention two more articles you have edited/created in the last two days. Austronesier (talk) 18:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Cal1407 (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kerinci language

Thank you for expanding the article. However, a lot of the details there are very outdated, especially considering that the analysis of phonology and morphosyntax rely on earlier publications from BB. I can see that it mentions the "basic" vs "inflective" alternation (which is the characteristic feature of core Kerinci dialects), but that alternation has a much more widespread use and impact on the grammar than noted there. Also, both of the forms should really be considered "basic" (i.e. not derivative of each other) and are usually cited together in more recent publications, e.g. umah/umoh 'house' (instead of just umah) for Sungai Penuh Kerinci (Steinhauer 2018), cf. also "[...] gadɔyh/gadeyh, in Tanjung Pauh as gadeh/gadyh, and in Koto Keras as gaduh/gadi [...]" in the article (they are actual morphophonological alternations with distinct grammatical functions). Parts of the analysis are also questionable and seemingly influenced by the analysis of standard variaties; e.g. lah in Kerinci is more of a particle than a suffix (cf. Ernanda 2017).

Lastly, it should always be made clear which dialect(s) are used in the examples, because as noted, there are a quite a lot of variations among them (mostly in phonology and lexicon, but also slightly in morphosyntax). The differences are to the point that speakers of Kerinci only use their specific lect within their dusun, and they usually switch to a kind of "interdialect" Kerinci Malay stripped of the most unique features when speaking with Kerinci speakers from other villages. — swarabakti^💬 15:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My edits are mostly based on books published by the Agency for Language Development and Cultivation. While I agree that these sources might be outdated (most were published in the 1980s), they currently offer the most comprehensive information on the structure of the Kerinci language. I acknowledge that it is unclear which dialect forms the basis of the phonology, and I am unable to identify it since the references do not specify this, and I am not a Kerinci speaker myself. You are very welcome to add or edit any parts of the article as you see fit. Thanks. Cal1407 (talk) 15:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ernanda (2017) is much more comprehensive and is publicly available btw. Also, Nikelas et al. (1981) does identify the informants as coming from the dusun of "Pondok Tinggi", while Usman's dictionary is based on Sungai Penuh dialect. I do plan to overhaul the article later, mostly based on the descriptions of Sungai Penuh and Pondok Tinggi dialects, though it may take some time. — swarabakti^💬 15:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to read Ernanda (2017) if I have the time. Maybe I can assists you in editing the parts. Cal1407 (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Larantuka Malay

Hello Cal1407, can you help me fix the error on the page Larantuka Malay, I don't understand the footnotes or quotation section. I think you can help. Danke! Elijah Mahoebessy (talk) 13:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Balinese Language

Hello can you make distribution map of the Balinese language in Indonesia like madurese language? by district or Regency i will accept it thank you. (Note: Balinese is the majority language in Tegaldlimo Banyuwangi) I Kadékk Gilang (talk) 09:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Lion Air Group destinations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Lion Air Group destinations, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lion Air Group destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]