User talk:CafecitodeStarbucks
September 2022
[edit]
Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Carlos Hank González. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch™ 14:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CafecitodeStarbucks. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Girth Summit (blether) 10:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
{{unblock|Hello. The Stella and HistoriaPolitica accounts are mine, though I don't recognize the other one listed. Having read the policy, which I should have done beforehand, I can see that my edits using alternate accounts were in violation of the rules, and I genuinely apologize about that. Going forward, I will stick to this account for my edits, though I will list my other accounts in my user page, as required in Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry}}- Would I be able to create the user page to add that information under the block? Or would it be preferable to await a final decision on whether my accounts will be permanently blocked or not?
- I still stand by my edit, as I believe the added information was added incompletly and malitiously, even by using the sources provided by Yelobluread themself. However, I understand that has no bearing on my violation of the rules itself. CafecitodeStarbucks (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)